Skip to Content
Food news from the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources
Produce at the market
Comments:
by Tony
on March 23, 2016 at 12:03 PM
Wow, using this logic, it's better to truck water in from out of state to lower the "drought water" use within CA commodities. Sounds affordable and sustainable to me.
by Lauren M. McNees
on March 23, 2016 at 2:40 PM
This is a very interesting and thought provoking study. Thank you for providing it. I have one comment related to this sentence: "The water embedded in feed shipped into California may be relevant to a drought in Nebraska, Idaho, Alberta, or some other state or province from which the feed is shipped, but it is not part of the drought-relevant water allocated in California." In my opinion, just because it's not California water doesn't mean we can disregard it. It's still a natural resource that should be considered. I would be interested to know how the states that produce the feed are doing at managing their water resources. Thank you!
 
Leave a Reply:

You are currently not signed in. If you have an account, then sign in now!
Anonymous users messages may be delayed.
 

Security Code:
UAMEZS