- Author: Cheryl Reynolds
The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) runs the most extensive Pesticide Residue Monitoring Program in the nation and is hard at work ensuring that the fruit and vegetables we purchase and consume are free from illegal pesticide residues. Just last month, DPR detected residues of a pesticide not registered for use on grapes and fined the grower $10,000 for using a pesticide in violation of the label and for packing and attempting to sell the tainted produce.
Cases like this are rare in California but remind growers how important it is to apply pesticides correctly by following all pesticide label directions. Understanding and following label instructions is the focus of a new online course developed by the University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program (UC IPM).
Proper Pesticide Use to Avoid Illegal Residues is targeted to those who apply pesticides or make pesticide recommendations. It explains what pesticide residues are, how they are monitored, and highlights important residue-related information from several sections of pesticide labels. In addition, the course identifies the following as the most important factors leading to illegal residues:
Using a pesticide on a crop or against a pest for which it is not registered
-
Applying pesticides at an incorrect rate
-
Ignoring preharvest intervals, re-treatment intervals, or plantback restrictions
Course participants are presented with several real-life scenarios. They must search through actual pesticide labels to determine if the scenario illustrates proper use of pesticides or if the described situation could potentially lead to illegal residues.
The overall goal of this course is to have participants follow pesticide label instructions when they return to the field. Following the label can eliminate incidences of illegal pesticide use.
Proper Pesticide Use to Avoid Illegal Residues is published just in time for pest control advisers and pesticide applicators who are still a few units short to renew their licenses or certificates with DPR. The course has been approved for 2 hours of Pesticide Laws and Regulations continuing education units (CEUs) from DPR and costs $40. If you don't need CEUs, but are still interested in viewing the course content, check it out for free on YouTube.
DPR recommends that renewal packets be submitted before November 1 in order to receive your renewed license or certificate by December 31, as the processing time can take up to 60 days. For additional online courses that UC IPM offers, visit the online training page.
- Author: UC Statewide IPM Program
Various insects, birds, and other animals pollinate plants. Bees, especially honey bees, are the most vital for pollinating food crops. Many California crops rely on bees to pollinate their flowers and ensure a good yield of seeds, fruit, and nuts. Pesticides, especially insecticides, can harm bees if they are applied or allowed to drift to plants that are flowering.
Our mission at the University of California Agricultural and Natural Resources (UC ANR), Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program (UC IPM) is to protect the environment by reducing risks caused by pest management practices. UC IPM developed Bee Precaution Pesticide Ratings to help pest managers make an informed decision about how to protect bees when choosing or applying pesticides. You can find and compare ratings for pesticide active ingredients including acaricides (miticides), bactericides, fungicides, herbicides, and insecticides, and select the one posing the least harm to bees.
A group of bee experts in California, Oregon, and Washington worked with UC IPM to develop the Bee Precaution Pesticide Ratings. They reviewed studies published in scientific journals and summary reports from European and United States pesticide regulatory agencies. While the protection statements on the pesticide labels were taken into account when determining the ratings, it is important to stress that UC IPM's ratings are not the pollinator protection statements on the pesticide labels. In a number of cases, the ratings suggest a more protective action than the pesticide label.
The UC IPM ratings also include active ingredients that may not be registered in your state; please follow local regulations. In California, the suggested use of the bee precaution pesticide ratings is in conjunction with UC Pest Management Guidelines (for commercial agriculture) and Pest Notes (for gardeners). Each crop in the UC Pest Management Guidelines has a link to the Bee Precaution Pesticide Ratings database and provides guidance on how to reduce bee poisoning from pesticides.
For more information on protecting bees from pesticides, see UC IPM's Protecting Natural Enemies and Pollinators, and use the Bee Precaution Pesticide Ratings.
- Author: Kathleen Reyes
- Author: Ashley Van Vliet
- Author: Vonny M. Barlow
The Integrated Pest Information Platform for Extension and Education (iPiPE) is dedicated towards creating a nationwide data base system that tracks various crop pests and diseases. The program aims to address the need for a more efficient form of pest and disease management in crops to increase profit by decreasing the amount
iPiPE is currently collaborating with several integrated pest management programs (IPM) and universities across the United States in order to refine the online system and begin to introduce iPiPE to the agricultural community. Here at the University of California's Cooperative Extension facility in Blythe, CA, entomologist Dr. Vonny M. Barlow is currently working on his second year with Euchsistus servus and iPiPE interns
iPiPE interns Reyes and Van Vliet have been responsible for working with Dr. Barlow in gathering data and sharing their findings in the iPiPE online data system. Their work with the system is serving as a trial to help the program enhance their system features and allow a collection of data to save in order to begin the creation of the pest and disease tracking content for future pest management practitioners. Reyes and Van Vliet have also made efforts to be advocates for iPiPE by reaching out to PCA's and growers through different forms of communication methods. Outreach methods included emails, phone calls and personal meetings. As a form of educating growers and PCA's about iPiPE, a handout with information about the goals and benefits that the
iPiPE's efforts in creating a change in culture by launching their data system has been ambitious and it is the hope of the program that in time the agricultural community will hop on board and take note of the many benefits a nationwide database system can offer. Before that time comes, however, iPiPE will continue to devote its attention to encourage growers and PCAs to join the movement as well as optimize its content for the future benefit of the agricultural industry.