- Author: Steven T. Koike
- Author: Mark Bolda
While the recently detected charcoal rot disease (caused by the soilborne fungus Macrophomina phaseolina) was causing collapse of strawberry plants from various parts of California, a second soilborne issue was simultaneously affecting other fields. Fusarium wilt was first confirmed on California strawberry in 2006. Initially found in Ventura County, Fusarium wilt is now present on strawberry in Santa Barbara and Monterey counties. The spread of Fusarium wilt in the state along with the increasing problems with Macrophomina pose long term threats to the strawberry industry which at present does not have satisfactory plant resistance to both of these pathogens and which is facing a changing future without traditional fumigant products.
Symptoms of Fusarium wilt in strawberry consist of wilting of foliage, plant stunting, and drying and death of foliage (Figure 1). When plant crowns are cut open, internal vascular and cortex tissues are dark to orange brown (Figure 2). Disease is often most severe if the infected plant is subject to stresses such as weather extremes, water stress (shortage of water), poor soil conditions, or heavy fruit loads. In locations where the disease has occurred for more than one season, the patches can be quite large and appear to have spread from the initial problem area (Figure 3). Such patterns are consistent with the spread of a soilborne pathogen. It is noteworthy that in these cases we have never isolated other important, well known pathogens such as Colletotrichum, Phytophthora, or Verticillium. However, it is important to note that Fusarium wilt symptoms are virtually identical to those caused by charcoal rot. To complicate matters further, in some fields we have found both Fusarium and Macrophomina infecting the same plant. This overlap of symptoms means that growers and field personnel should have plants tested by a pathology lab in order to confirm which soilborne disease they are encountering.
Fusarium wilt is caused by the fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae. This pathogen is host specific to strawberry and can only infect this crop. The fungus survives in the soil for long periods by producing resilient, microscopic structures called chlamydospores (Figure 4). The development of Fusarium wilt has also been associated with changes in the practices of pre-plant soil fumigation. The fungus is spread within and between fields mostly by the transport of contaminated soil during soil tillage and preparation operations.
Current management strategies involve the following: (1) Crop rotation. Do not plant strawberry in fields having a known history of the problem and avoid back-to-back strawberry plantings in infested locations. (2) Pre-plant fumigation. This remains a useful tool for managing Fusarium and the other soilborne pests, even though bed-applied fumigants may not provide complete control. (3) Avoid stressing the plants. Stress will hasten the development and increase the severity of symptoms, so use appropriate growing and irrigation practices to reduce stress. Note, however, that even in the absence of stress, infected plants will eventually develop the disease. (4) Sanitation. Growers with Fusarium infested fields need to be concerned with limiting the spread of the fungus from infested to clean fields.
Figure 1. Fusarium wilt results in the collapse and death of strawberry plants.
Figure 2. Internal crown tissue of strawberry infected with Fusarium will show a dark to orange brown discoloration.
Figure 3. Fusarium wilt can affect large portions of a field and cause significant dieback.
Figure 4. Microscopic spherical structures called chlamydospores enable the Fusarium pathogen to survive in the soil.
- Author: Steven T. Koike
- Author: Mark Bolda
Beginning at least as early as 2005 and continuing through 2013, collapsing strawberry plants from various parts of California have been associated with the soilborne fungus Macrophomina phaseolina. The disease, called charcoal rot, appears to be the most important current concern for the industry due to its steady increase over this period of time. Each year finds additional new fields infested, and the disease has now been found in all of the major strawberry producing counties in the state. In 2005-2006, charcoal rot was restricted to southern California in Orange and Ventura counties. Most recently this disease has been confirmed in Santa Barbara, Monterey, Santa Cruz, and Santa Clara counties. The spread of Macrophomina to new fields and counties portends that charcoal rot may be a long term threat to the industry which at present does not have satisfactory plant resistance with which to combat the pathogen.
Symptoms of Macrophomina infection in strawberry consist of wilting of foliage, plant stunting, and drying and death of older leaves, with the central youngest leaves often remaining green and alive. Plants can eventually collapse and die (Figure 1). When plant crowns are cut open, internal vascular and cortex tissues are dark to orange brown (Figure 2). Disease is often most severe if the infected plant is subject to stresses such as weather extremes, water stress (shortage of water), poor soil conditions, or heavy fruit loads. In locations where the disease has occurred for more than one season, the patches can be quite large and appear to have spread from the initial problem area (Figure 3). Such patterns are consistent with the spread of a soilborne pathogen. It is noteworthy that in these cases we have never isolated other important, well known pathogens such as Colletotrichum, Phytophthora, or Verticillium. However, it is important to note that another recently described disease, Fusarium wilt, is also occurring in the same regions; symptoms of Fusarium wilt are identical to those caused by charcoal rot.
Macrophomina produces numerous tiny, black, irregularly shaped microsclerotia (Figure 4). These microsclerotia are survival structures that allow the fungus to persist for extended periods in the soil. The fungus is spread within and between fields mostly by the transport of contaminated soil during soil tillage and preparation operations. Spread of Macrophomina in strawberry fields deals with the same issue of field sanitation that concerns growers of many other commodities. Verticillium wilt (lettuce, strawberry, pepper), clubroot (broccoli, cauliflower), Fusarium wilt (lettuce), Fusarium yellows (celery), and lettuce dieback disease (lettuce) are all problems caused by soilborne pathogens that are spread in infested soil.
Current management strategies involve the following: (1) Crop rotation. Do not plant strawberry in fields having a known history of the problem and avoid back-to-back strawberry plantings in infested locations. (2) Pre-plant fumigation. This remains a useful tool for managing Macrophomina and the other soilborne pests, even though bed-applied fumigants may not provide complete control. (3) Avoid stressing the plants. Stress will hasten the development and increase the severity of symptoms, so use appropriate growing and irrigation practices to reduce stress. Note, however, that even in the absence of stress, infected plants will eventually develop the disease. (4) Sanitation. Growers with Macrophomina infested fields need to be concerned with limiting the spread of the fungus from infested to clean fields.
Figure 1. Charcoal rot results in the collapse and death of strawberry plants.
Figure 2. Internal crown tissue of strawberry infected with Macrophomina will show a dark to orange brown discoloration.
Figure 3. Charcoal rot can affect large portions of a field and cause significant dieback.
Figure 4. Tiny, black microsclerotia enable the Macrophomina pathogen to survive in the soil.
- Author: Steven T. Koike
2012 Pl Dis Sem annouce
- Author: Steven T. Koike
2012PlDisSemFirstNew
- Author: Michael D Cahn
- Contributor: Barry Farrara
Several strawberry growers have expressed interest in using evapotranspiration data for scheduling irrigations in strawberries, especially during the production season when crop water needs are greatest. Weather-based approaches to scheduling irrigations are used for many cultivated crops. Windspeed, air temperature, relative humidity, and solar radiation affect plant water-use, or more specifically the water lost by evaporation from the soil and by transpiration from the leaves of the crop. Using evapotranspiration (ET) data (evaporation + transpiration) from the California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS) the consumptive water use of a crop in units of inches or mm per day, can be estimated.
CIMIS ET data is available from the Department of Water Resources website (http://wwwcimis.water.ca.gov/cimis/welcome.jsp) for more than 120 locations in California, and is generated by weather stations located on irrigated grass, which serves as a reference crop. The MyCIMIS feature of the website allows the user to customize the reporting of CIMIS crop ET data, such as specifying type of weather data, stations, time period, and file format to display. MyCIMIS also allows the user to select for the data to be emailed to their account. Spatial CIMIS is another feature of the website that produces estimates of reference ET at a 2 km (1.2 mi) resolution using GOES satellite information and by triangulating humidity, temperature and wind speed data from the closest CIMIS stations to the point of interest. A Google map feature allows the user to locate a field of interest. Similar to MyCIMIS, a user can select to have updated Spatial CIMIS estimates of reference ET emailed.
ET can be estimated for a specific crop by multiplying reference ET data and the appropriate crop coefficient (Kc):
ETcrop = ETref × Kc
The value of Kc can range from almost 0 to greater than 1 and is closely related to the percentage of ground shaded by the canopy. Irrigation method and physiological stages, such as flowering and senescence are also factored into the crop coefficient. Crop ET values should be adjusted down by 20% to 30% for crops grown under macro tunnels or greenhouses because of shading.
Because accurate crop coefficients are not available for many crops, estimates of canopy cover serve as a close substitute for the Kc values. We have taken overhead photos of the UC strawberry variety Albion using an infra-red camera during the last 2 years. Photos were taken on a monthly schedule for fields with 48-, 52-, and 64- inch wide beds. After analyzing canopy images from 9 fields, we have estimated the Kc values on a weekly schedule during a 12 month period (Table 1). Because these data represent the average of several fields, values may need to be adjusted for site-specific conditions. Also, these Kc values for Albion represent Salinas and Pajaro Valley growing conditions and methods.
By irrigating enough to replace water lost by evapotranspiration it is possible to optimize irrigations for production and minimize percolation below the root zone. Also, it is possible to avoid under-irrigating during periods of high water consumption, which can result in stress and reduced growth. ETc estimates can be used to determine day by day soil water depletions from field capacity and thus can be used to also estimate when to irrigate. For detailed descriptions and examples of this technique, visit http://wwwcimis.water.ca.gov/cimis/infoIrrSchedule.jsp
Table 1. Estimated crop coefficient (Kc) for UC strawberry variety Albion.
48-inch bed width | 52-inch bed width | 64-inch bed width | |||||||
Plant Date | DAP | % canopy cover | Kc | % canopy cover | Kc | % canopy cover | Kc | ||
11/1/2011 | 0 | 1 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.02 | ||
11/8/2011 | 7 | 1 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.03 | ||
11/15/2011 | 14 | 1 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 2 | 0.03 | ||
11/22/2011 | 21 | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.02 | 2 | 0.04 | ||
11/29/2011 | 28 | 2 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.02 | 3 | 0.04 | ||
12/6/2011 | 35 | 2 | 0.04 | 1 | 0.03 | 3 | 0.05 | ||
12/13/2011 | 42 | 2 | 0.04 | 2 | 0.03 | 4 | 0.06 | ||
12/20/2011 | 49 | 3 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.04 | 4 | 0.07 | ||
12/27/2011 | 56 | 3 | 0.06 | 2 | 0.04 | 5 | 0.08 | ||
1/3/2012 | 63 | 4 | 0.06 | 3 | 0.05 | 6 | 0.09 | ||
1/10/2012 | 70 | 5 | 0.08 | 4 | 0.06 | 7 | 0.11 | ||
1/17/2012 | 77 | 5 | 0.09 | 4 | 0.07 | 8 | 0.13 | ||
1/24/2012 | 84 | 6 | 0.10 | 5 | 0.08 | 10 | 0.15 | ||
1/31/2012 | 91 | 8 | 0.12 | 6 | 0.10 | 11 | 0.17 | ||
2/7/2012 | 98 | 9 | 0.14 | 7 | 0.11 | 13 | 0.20 | ||
2/14/2012 | 105 | 10 | 0.16 | 9 | 0.13 | 15 | 0.23 | ||
2/21/2012 | 112 | 12 | 0.18 | 10 | 0.15 | 18 | 0.26 | ||
2/28/2012 | 119 | 14 | 0.21 | 12 | 0.18 | 20 | 0.29 | ||
3/6/2012 | 126 | 16 | 0.23 | 14 | 0.21 | 23 | 0.33 | ||
3/13/2012 | 133 | 18 | 0.27 | 16 | 0.24 | 26 | 0.37 | ||
3/20/2012 | 140 | 21 | 0.30 | 19 | 0.28 | 29 | 0.41 | ||
3/27/2012 | 147 | 23 | 0.33 | 22 | 0.32 | 33 | 0.46 | ||
4/3/2012 | 154 | 26 | 0.37 | 25 | 0.36 | 36 | 0.50 | ||
4/10/2012 | 161 | 29 | 0.41 | 28 | 0.40 | 40 | 0.54 | ||
4/17/2012 | 168 | 32 | 0.44 | 32 | 0.44 | 43 | 0.58 | ||
4/24/2012 | 175 | 35 | 0.48 | 35 | 0.49 | 47 | 0.62 | ||
5/1/2012 | 182 | 38 | 0.52 | 39 | 0.53 | 50 | 0.66 | ||
5/8/2012 | 189 | 40 | 0.55 | 43 | 0.57 | 54 | 0.70 | ||
5/15/2012 | 196 | 43 | 0.58 | 46 | 0.61 | 57 | 0.73 | ||
5/22/2012 | 203 | 46 | 0.61 | 49 | 0.65 | 60 | 0.76 | ||
5/29/2012 | 210 | 48 | 0.64 | 53 | 0.69 | 62 | 0.79 | ||
6/5/2012 | 217 | 50 | 0.66 | 55 | 0.72 | 65 | 0.81 | ||
6/12/2012 | 224 | 52 | 0.69 | 58 | 0.75 | 67 | 0.83 | ||
6/19/2012 | 231 | 54 | 0.71 | 61 | 0.77 | 69 | 0.85 | ||
6/26/2012 | 238 | 56 | 0.72 | 63 | 0.79 | 70 | 0.87 | ||
7/3/2012 | 245 | 57 | 0.74 | 65 | 0.81 | 72 | 0.88 | ||
7/10/2012 | 252 | 59 | 0.75 | 66 | 0.83 | 73 | 0.89 | ||
7/17/2012 | 259 | 60 | 0.76 | 68 | 0.84 | 74 | 0.90 | ||
7/24/2012 | 266 | 61 | 0.77 | 69 | 0.85 | 75 | 0.91 | ||
7/31/2012 | 273 | 61 | 0.78 | 70 | 0.86 | 76 | 0.92 | ||
8/7/2012 | 280 | 62 | 0.79 | 71 | 0.87 | 76 | 0.92 | ||
8/14/2012 | 287 | 63 | 0.79 | 71 | 0.88 | 77 | 0.93 | ||
8/21/2012 | 294 | 63 | 0.80 | 72 | 0.88 | 77 | 0.93 | ||
8/28/2012 | 301 | 64 | 0.80 | 72 | 0.89 | 78 | 0.94 | ||
9/4/2012 | 308 | 64 | 0.81 | 73 | 0.89 | 78 | 0.94 | ||
9/11/2012 | 315 | 64 | 0.81 | 73 | 0.90 | 78 | 0.94 | ||
9/18/2012 | 322 | 65 | 0.81 | 74 | 0.90 | 79 | 0.95 | ||
9/25/2012 | 329 | 65 | 0.82 | 74 | 0.90 | 79 | 0.95 | ||
10/2/2012 | 336 | 65 | 0.82 | 74 | 0.90 | 79 | 0.95 | ||
10/9/2012 | 343 | 65 | 0.82 | 74 | 0.90 | 79 | 0.95 | ||
10/16/2012 | 350 | 65 | 0.82 | 74 | 0.91 | 79 | 0.95 | ||
10/23/2012 | 357 | 65 | 0.82 | 74 | 0.91 | 79 | 0.95 | ||
10/30/2012 | 364 | 66 | 0.82 | 75 | 0.91 | 80 | 0.95 |