- Author: Michael D Cahn
As we come to the close of the 2024 growing season there is time to think about how to improve in the upcoming year. Please consider implementing some of these tips on irrigation management as you prepare for the 2025 season. Our staff is happy to assist you with any water or nutrient management challenges you may have. Just give us a call (831-759-7377) or send an email (mdcahn@ucanr.edu). Happy Holidays!
1. Test your water and soil for salts. The quality of your water can be as important as the quantity. Many vegetables are sensitive to salinity, so you want to be sure that the water applied to your crop has a low level salts. Also, because salts from irrigation water accumulate near the crop roots over time, one needs to test the salinity of the soil periodically to determine if leaching is needed. The main constituents to test for in a saturated paste extract of a soil sample are pH, bulk salinity (TDS or electrical conductivity), Ca, Mg, Na, Cl, SO4, NO3, HCO3, and B. Test the same constituents for water but also add Fe and Mn. Seek out advice from an experienced agronomist/soil scientist/ or crop consultant who can help you interpret the test results.
2. Evaluate the application uniformity of your irrigation system. The more uniform that your irrigation system distributes water to your crop, the less water is needed to achieve good yields and quality. Using 30 equal sized cups and a stop watch, you can evaluate the distribution uniformity of your sprinkler or drip system. Alternatively, consider hiring an irrigation consultant to conduct a more intensive evaluation.
3. Evaluate the design and operation of your irrigation system. Many problems with irrigation systems are caused either by a poor design, lack of maintenance, or because they are not operated correctly. An experienced irrigation consultant should be able to narrow down to the main issues that limit the performance of your irrigation system, and recommend the most cost effective solutions.
5. Monitor pressure of the irrigation system. Getting the best performance from your drip and sprinkler systems depends on operating them at the right pressure. Variation in pressure will vary the flow and uniformity of applied water. Use high quality gauges to monitor pressure at different locations in the field, including at the closest and furthest points from the water source or irrigation valve.
6. Measure how much water you apply. It is difficult to save water if you do not know how much you are applying to your crops. Using a flowmeter and keeping records of the amount of water applied for each crop can help you determine if the amount of water you are applying is matching crop needs.
7. Use weather information and soil moisture to guide irrigation scheduling. The closer that you can match the irrigations with the needs of your crop, the more efficient your water use will be. Irrigation scheduling is the combination of deciding when and how much water to apply. Water needs of the crop change during the season as weather conditions vary and the crop matures. Monitoring soil moisture can help you decide when to irrigate and using evapotranspiration data from weather stations can help with estimating how much water to apply.
8. Conduct regular maintenance of the irrigation system. Just like your car needs periodic servicing, an irrigation system need regular maintenance. Leaks in drip tape, pipe, and layflat need to be patched. Drip lines and filters need to be flushed. Sprinkler heads, nozzles, and gaskets wear out and need to be replaced. Develop a schedule for irrigation system maintenance.
9. Train your irrigators. A well trained irrigator can help solve a lot of water management problems on your farm. An irrigator's job goes beyond moving pipe and drip tape. They should have a good, basic understanding of how the irrigation system operates, be able to keep accurate records, and understand how to make routine measurements to assure the irrigation system is operating correctly. They also may need training on the operation of new equipment and maintenance procedures. Providing regular training opportunities so that irrigators can increase their skill set will make them more valuable to your farming operation.
10. Infiltrate winter precipitation for salinity management. The best water for leaching salts from your vegetable fields is free, and comes from the sky. Letting storm water run-off your fallow fields is a lost opportunity to remove salts. Using cover crops, tillage, or adding soil amendments can increase infiltration of winter rains and will help control potential salinity problems.
- Author: Richard Smith
- Author: Michael Cahn
On April 15th, the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (CCRWQCB) finalized and approved Ag Order 4.0. The new rulings affect several aspects of agricultural production such as buffer areas and discharge of pesticides to water ways. In this article we will focus on the impacts of Ag Order 4.0 on the use of nitrogen (N) fertilizers.
New targets and limits on the use of N fertilizer are calculated using the A minus R metric. In this scenario, “A” is N applied to the crop in the form of fertilizer (Afertilizer), N in irrigation water (Airrigation), N supplied by compost (Acompost) and N mineralized from organic fertilizer (Aorganic fertilizer). “R” is N removed from the field by the crop (Rharvest), scavenged during the winter fallow by cover crops or immobilized by high-carbon compost (Rscavenge), N removed by denitrification bioreactors (Rtreated), N sequestered in woody plant biomass (Rsequestered), or other unspecified forms of N removal from fields (Rother). Although AgOrder 4.0 outlines 3 pathways to compliance, pathway 1 is most likely the one that most ranches would use unless the wells have very high nitrate-N concentrations (> 40 ppm N). A - R is not to exceed the targets or limits shown in Table 1 for pathway 1 compliance. The A-R is calculated over the growing season on a land acre basis. If two or more crops are grown on the same physical acre, each crop contributes to the value for the year. Below is a discussion of each component of the A-R metric.
Table 1. A-R regulatory schedule
Regulatory Status |
A-R Limit Lbs N/ac/year |
Compliance Date (as of Dec. 31) |
Target |
500 |
2023 |
Target |
400 |
2025 |
Limit |
300 |
2027 |
Limit |
200 |
2031 |
Limit |
150 |
2036 |
Limit |
100 |
2041 |
Limit |
50 |
2051 |
The “A” side of the equation:
Afertilizer is the amount of N fertilizer added to grow the crop. The actual units of N in lbs/A are used in this calculation.
Airrigation is the amount of N contained in the irrigation water that is taken up by the crop. For most vegetable and berry crops grown on the central coast the volume of water that must be accounted for in this calculation is equivalent to the volume used by the crop for evapotranspiration (ET). For crops where less water is applied than ET, the volume of applied water can be used in the calculation. To calculate Airrigation use the equation:
Airrigation = water volume (inches) x nitrate-N concentration of water (ppm N) x 0.227
The factor 0.227 converts the units inches x ppm N to lbs of N/acre.
For example, if a lettuce crop uses 7.3 inches for ET, and is irrigated with water that has a 37 ppm N concentration, the Airrigation would be:
7.3 inches x 37 ppm N x 0.227 = 61 lbs N/acre
Acompost is the amount of N provided by compost. Given that the amount of N that is mineralized by the compost depends on the carbon to nitrogen (C:N) ratio not all the N in the compost becomes available. This fact is recognized in the Ag Order as follows:
For compost with a C:N ratio of <11, the amount of N in the compost is multiplied by 0.10, and for composts with a C:N ratio of >11 the amount of N in the compost is multiplied by 0.05. Only this amount of N is added to the A side of the equation. These discount factors were an important change made by the Regional Board staff to reflect the actual quantity of N provided by compost and to avoid a disincentive to the use of composts, a key soil health practice.
Aorganic fertilizer is the amount of N that is mineralized during the cropping system. The amount of N mineralized depends upon the C:N ratio of the material and the CCRWQCB is using the regression curve in a recent paper published by Lazicki et al (2020) to determine the amount of N mineralized. For instance, a material like 4-4-2 has a C:N ratio of 7.3 (29% C/4% N) and has a discount factor of 0.39 (Table MRP-3 in Attachment B). This means that if 100 units of N are applied as 4-4-2, the amount mineralized from this material and that is attributed to the A side of the equation is 39 lbs/A (100 lbs x 0.39). This discount factor acknowledges the fact that not all N in organic fertilizer mineralizes during the cropping season and was an important correction made to Ag Order 4.0.
The “R” side of the equation:
Rharvest is the amount of N that is removed from the field in the harvested product. The amount of N removed in the harvested product is calculated by a removal coefficient composed of the percent moisture multiplied by the percent N of the crop. This coefficient is then multiplied by the net pounds of product harvested from a field to determine lbs N/A removed. We have been working on a project developing N removal coefficients for a number of vegetable commodities. Table 2 shows data for full term romaine lettuce. Note that percent solids and nitrogen values observed in our evaluations vary significantly and that the mean value has a notable degree of variability which affects the estimate of N removed by the crop. Regardless of the variability, the important point to recognize is that the removed N is modest in relation to the amount of N applied. Figure 1 shows total fertilizer N to lettuce for a large number of vegetable operations in our area. It becomes evident that growers face some major challenges in complying with the application limits as the limits ratchet down over the next several years.
Table 2. Example of calculation of removal coefficient for a full-term romaine crop.
Component |
Mean |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Solids |
5.69% (0.0569) |
4.65% (0.0465) |
7.51% (0.0751) |
Nitrogen |
3.15% (0.0315) |
2.33% (0.0233) |
3.97% (0.0397) |
Removal Coefficient |
0.00178* |
0.00147 |
0.00243 |
Romaine yield (lbs) |
30,000 |
30,000 |
30,000 |
Crop R value (lbs N/ac) |
54 |
44 |
73 |
* 0.0569 x 0.0315 = 0.00178
Rscavenge is the amount of N that is captured by by cover crops or immobilized by high-carbon compost during the winter fallow period. The CCRWQCB agreed to credit non-legume winter cover crops with 97% of their N content that meet the following criteria: 1) are grown for ≥ 90 days during the winter fallow period, 2) accumulate more than 4,500 lbs/acre of dry biomass and 3) have a C:N ratio of ≥ 20 when incorporated into the ground. N scavenging credits granted for cover crops are helpful, but do not remove any of the current logistical barriers to using of cover crops in intensive vegetable systems. However, given that non-legume cover crops routinely contain 100 to 150+ lbs N/acre, as N application limits ratchet down, cover crop use may be incentivized to some degree.
High-carbon composts were also included in the Rscavenge category. This practice is still being researched to fully understand how much N can be immobilized. Growers already use compost (typical C:N ratio of 10-12) but could substitute high-carbon compost (C:N ratio of >30) which can quickly facilitate its use. Currently, high-carbon compost has been granted a credit of 30 lbs N/acre in Ag Order 4.0. However, once the research on this practice is completed, this practice may be granted greater credits as warranted on the R side of the equation.
Rtreat is the quantity of N removed from tile drainage and irrigation runoff by denitrification bioreactors or constructed wetlands. This practice can be implemented in the northern part of Monterey County where high nitrate tile drain water impacts the surrounding sloughs and creeks. The bioreactors vary in size and sophistication, from sunken beds filled with wood chips to highly engineered portable treatment systems.
Rsequestered is the quantity of N that is captured in the woody plant tissue of perennial crops. This form of N removal is relevant to vineyards and orchards in our area and does not impact the vegetable industry.
Rother is the quantity of N removed from the field in other, unspecified ways. One form of N removal not addressed in Ag Order 4.0 is the gaseous loss of N by denitrification from soil. This is a topic that needs further research. Two studies done on the Central Coast showed that in sandy soils with drip irrigation, there is little nitrous oxide or dinitrogen loss (2-4 lbs N/acre/crop). However, an earlier study of celery and lettuce production fields in the 1980s showed that on heavier soil with furrow irrigation gaseous N losses ranged from 18 to 37 lbs N/acre. Further research is needed to understand denitrification rates more fully in coastal vegetable production.
What options does the industry have moving forward?
Basically, a timer has been started by Ag Order 4.0. The first dates are targets of 500 lbs N/acre/year 2 years from now and 400 lbs N/acre/year in 2025 (four years). Starting in 2027 the targets become limits ratcheting down to 300 lbs N/acre/year. In scenarios that we and others have run, the 300 lbs N/acre/year limit will become very challenging for growers to comply with in typical double cropped production. There are basically three key practices that will provide the most improvements in N use efficiency: 1) measuring residual soil nitrate and adjusting fertilizer applications accordingly, 2) accounting for the nitrate in irrigation water as part of the N budget, and 3) improving irrigation efficiency to help maintain residual soil nitrate in the active rootzone of crops. A concerted focus on these three practices will require a commitment from the decision makers at each farming operation. Farming operations have differed in their approach to the pending water quality regulations. Some have taken a proactive approach and are farther along on the learning curve. It is important to make attempts to begin implementing these practices and see what is possible for your operation given the crop mix, soil types, and nitrate levels in the irrigation water. The good news is that there is still time. To begin implementing these practices, it is important to start small to gain the needed knowledge base in efficient N and water management practices. Working with knowledgeable people will be essential.
Other options that can help fine tune fertilizer applications and reduce the risk of cutting fertilizer rates are various nitrogen technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and controlled release fertilizers. In studies that we have done, there is clearly a benefit to the use of some of these materials, but again, there is a learning curve to obtaining the benefits that they can provide. Nitrapyrin (a nitrification inhibitor commonly used in the corn belt) was registered on lettuce and brassicas in 2019 and has not been widely used yet by the industry, but it along with other materials, deserves greater evaluation.
In addition to improving in-season N use efficiency, implementation of practices to minimize nitrate losses during the winter fallow period is needed. Cover crops are a key practice for reducing leaching losses during the winter and finding opportunities for their use will become more important in the next several years. The credits given cover crops on the R side of the equation can help growers achieve compliance with Ag Order 4.0 as the A – R limits are reduced to less than 300 lbs N/acre/year.
In summary, the finalization of Ag Order 4.0 will have a significant impact on how vegetables are grown on the Central Coast in the coming years. There is a window of opportunity to experiment on how to address limits that will be applied to the use of N fertilizers. Now is the time to make the decisions needed to address this new reality. Please do not hesitate to reach out to us for help or advice.
- Author: Michael Cahn
- Author: Richard Smith
Tuesday, February 23;
7:55 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
Habrá traducción al Español
Registration Cost: $10
Registration Link: https://ucanr.edu/survey/survey.cfm?surveynumber=32769
7:55 Introduction
8:00 Woodchip bioreactors for removal of nitrate and pesticides from tile drainage.
Pam Krone-Davis, California Marine Sanctuary Foundation
8:30 Nitrogen mineralization from organic fertilizers and composts
Daniel Geisseler, UC Davis
9:00 Improving the efficiency of drip germination of lettuce and weed control.
Michael Cahn and Richard Smith, UC Cooperative Extension
9:30 Using weather-based irrigation scheduling for optimizing red cabbage production.
Lee Johnson, NASA Ames Research Center-CSUMB
10:00 Break
10:15 Update on Ag Order 4.0.
Matt Keeling, Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
10:45 Development of N removal coefficients for vegetables on the central coast
Richard Smith, UC Cooperative Extension
11:15 New approaches for using Polyacrylamide (PAM) for mitigating sediment and pesticides in irrigation runoff.
Michael Cahn, UC Cooperative extension
11:45 Using high-carbon compost for reducing nitrate leaching during the winter.
Richard Smith, UC Cooperative Extension
12:00 Adjourn
CCA & DPR continuing education credits have been requested