Springtime planting is almost here but don't rush to plant seeds until the soil has warmed up! Planting seeds too soon, when the soil is cold and wet, risks losing them to damping-off, a disease caused by fungi and oomycetes in the soil. Learn more about this common disease in the newly updated Pest Notes: Damping-off Diseases in the Garden written by UC IPM Director Dr. Jim Farrar and UCCE emeritus advisor Ed Perry. They cover the biology of the pathogens, identification of the disease, and how to prevent damping-off when growing transplants or seeding directly into the ground.

Seedling on the right is wilting from postemergence damping-off. Photo by R. Michael Davis.

Figure 1. A coast live oak killed by sudden oak death. Photo by Jack Kelly Clark.

Sudden oak death (SOD) is a disease syndrome that has killed millions of native oak trees (Figure 1) along the west coast of the United States, from Big Sur in California up to Southern Oregon. The disease may involve several organisms, but its main driver is the fungus-like organism (known as  water mold), Phytophthora ramorum. This plant pathogen is spread in the springtime by windy rainstorms. It infects the bark of oak trees, frequently creating bleeding trunk cankers that interfere with water uptake and sugar transport.

Death of SOD-infected trees can be accelerated by attacks from bark and ambrosia beetles. In the absence of beetle attacks, infected oaks may take years to die.

Many common disorders (other than P. ramorum infections) can cause damage that resembles SOD, so laboratory testing is needed to confirm the diagnosis.

Sudden Oak Death Host Range

Sudden oak death isn't always sudden, nor does it infect just oaks. The potential host list of P. ramorum includes hundreds of plant species, many of which are natives of California's woodlands and forests. In most of these host species, the pathogen simply causes small necrotic spots on the leaves (Figure 2). In a few instances, notably in certain susceptible Rhododendron cultivars, the disease may progress from the leaves down into the stem and kill the plant.

Figure 2. Bay laurel leaves with brown lesions caused by Phytophthora ramorum. Photo by Pavel Svihra.

Phytophthora ramorum has evolved as a foliar pathogen, primarily spreading from the leaves of infected hosts such as bay laurel (Umbellularia californica), tanoak (Notholithocarpus densiflorus), and rhododendrons. Therefore, it does not spread easily to other plants from oak trunk cankers. Thus, when oaks become infected, they are referred to as terminal hosts. Tanoak acts as both a foliar host, spreading spores from its leaves in wet and windy weather conditions, and a terminal host, developing cankers that are almost always lethal to the infected plant (Figure 3). Perhaps because infected tanoak leaves rain spores onto their own trunks, their SOD survival rates are among the lowest of all trees that may become afflicted by the disease in North America.

Despite its fearsome reputation, SOD doesn't always kill infected oaks. Valley oak (Quercus lobata), blue oak (Q. douglasii), and Oregon white oak (Q. garryana) are not known to develop cankers in nature, while coast live oak (Q. agrifolia), black oak (Q. kelloggii), Shreve oak (Q. parvula var. shrevei), and interior live oak (Q. wislizeni) are considered susceptible. Recent studies have demonstrated that there may be considerable variance in some coast live oaks, with measured resistance varying from about 16-40%. Many of these resistant or tolerant trees do become infected but are able to defeat the pathogen before trunk cankers enlarge to life-threatening sizes. Casual observations suggest that resistance levels seen in coast live oaks are likely similar to those in Shreve oak and black oak populations. Because interior live oak trees grow in comparatively hotter, dryer, environments than the other susceptible oaks, they almost never become infected, so resistance levels have not been studied. Tree age seems to play a role too. Oak trees under four inches in trunk diameter at chest height are not typically susceptible to infection by P. ramorum.

Figure 3. Dark sap droplets exuding from tanbark oak infested with Phytophthora ramorum. Photo by Pavel Svihra.

Treatment Approaches

Many different treatment approaches have been trialed, a few of which have shown promise.

Prevention

Potassium phosphite compounds (AgriFos, Reliant, Garden Phos, etc.) work best as preventive treatments. Most of the efficacy achieved by these compounds appears to be the result of stimulating the trees' natural defensive systems, although individual oaks vary widely in their immune responses. Thus, the application of potassium phosphite compounds is a bit of a gamble as to whether it will actually help an individual tree. Trees that are already showing symptoms of infection when treated have a significantly lower survival probability than trees that appear healthy during treatment.

There are two different recommended application methods for potassium phosphites—surface sprays made directly to the bark (using a surfactant such as Pentrabark) and trunk injections. Some applicators have claimed increased efficacy from the trunk injections, albeit at the cost of potential damage to the tree from wounding. Others have claimed equivalent efficacy with repeated bark sprays, when carefully timed. Application of calcium to the root zones of oaks treated with potassium phosphite has been shown to further improve resistance rates.

Potassium phosphite treatments should be made in the spring and fall, regardless of the application method used. This is because the uptake of potassium phosphite by the tree is dependent on high transpiration rates. High transpiration rates in turn depend on both adequate available soil moisture, and warm and sunny weather, preferably with a light breeze.

Another preventive treatment option that has proven to be effective is removal of foliar hosts that are near highly valued oak trees (Figure 4). Removing bay laurels that have foliage within about 30 feet of an oak trunk decreases the chances of that oak becoming infected. Removal is especially effective for small, understory foliar hosts, such as young bay laurels, poison oak, and rhododendron. This is not a recommendation for the wholesale removal of bay laurel trees, which are important parts of the California forest ecosystem and should be retained where appropriate. This management approach should only be adopted after careful consideration of the ecological function of the forest or woodland as a whole.

Figure 4. Coast live oak with limbs killed by the sudden oak death pathogen, Phytophthora ramorum, possibly spread from nearby infected California Bay laurel. Photo by Pavel Svihra.

Management of Active Infections

Bark scribing, or cutting away the outer portion of infected bark to let the infection site dry out, was previously touted as an effective treatment for infected oaks. However, rigorous testing has since shown that it does not significantly increase the odds of an oak surviving. Similarly, the application of whitewash to tree trunks has not been shown to make measurable improvements to survival of treated oaks as compared to no treatment at all.

Mefanoxam (Subdue Maxx, Stergo MX, etc.) is a fungicide with a proven record of suppressing Phytophthora activity. It has been used to successfully treat infected plants, keeping them alive as long as treatment continues, typically over the span of a year or two. However, in most cases, once treatment stops, Phytophthora begins growing again within several months, and the infected plants will eventually succumb to the disease. While mefanoxam fungicides may be effectively used in certain limited situations, they should not be considered effective curative treatments. Resistance to this active ingredient has developed repeatedly, rendering it unacceptable for long-term use.

In summary, no silver bullet exists for preventing SOD, and there are no effective tools that will reliably save a tree that is already showing symptoms of infection. This does not mean that any oak that exhibits SOD trunk cankers or bleeding symptoms will die. Bleeding from the bark is a normal response to substantial damage, whether from a pest, pathogen, or, sometimes, even mechanical damage. Even if bleeding is the result of infection by P. ramorum, symptomatic trees have recovered with no intervention, usually in association with a few dry years. The most effective tools for managing SOD are preventive, in nature. For more information and best management practices, please see the California Oak Mortality Task Force website at: https://www.suddenoakdeath.org.

Outbreaks similar to El Niño-influenced issues of the 1990s

The wave of atmospheric rivers that swept across the state this winter has created the right conditions for plant pathogens that haven't been seen for decades in California. University of California, Davis, plant pathologist Florent “Flo” Trouillas is getting more calls from growers and farm advisors concerned about potential crop damage.

“Generally, whenever you have rain events, you're going to have problems,” said Trouillas, a Cooperative Extension specialist who is based at the Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center in Parlier. “In wet years we get really busy because most pathogens need and like water.”

Trouillas is like a disease detective. He splits his time between the field and the lab, working to diagnose pathogens, diseases and other ailments that strike fruit and nut crops such as almonds, cherries, olives and pistachios.

UC Cooperative Extension specialist Florent Trouillas examines a cherry tree in Lodi for potential pathogens. Photo by Jael Mackendorf, UC Davis

On a recent visit to an almond orchard near Fresno, Trouillas joined Mae Culumber, a nut crops farm advisor for UC Cooperative Extension Fresno County. A few weeks earlier, the two had walked the orchard, taking note of the base of some trees that had gumming — a thick, jelly-looking substance indicating a pathogen had taken hold.

“A lot of what Florent is doing is trying to assess patterns on a landscape,” Culumber said. “Sometimes things may look like they are one thing, but it could be another problem.”

When the two returned weeks later, the amber-colored gumming had moved into the canopy, looking like gumballs stuck to branches, some of which were already dead. “It's getting out of control from before,” Trouillas says. “This branch was killed. This is widespread.”

From the field to the lab

Lab testing confirmed what Trouillas believed was the culprit: Phytophthora syringae, a pathogen that can affect almond crops but is rarely seen in California. If it is found, generally the site of infection are wounds caused by pruning, but that is not the case here, where the infection began in the canopy at twigs, or small branches.

It is a threat to a key crop, which according to the California Department of Food and Agriculture, generates $5 billion annually. The last time Phytophthora syringae hit California was in the 1990s after a series of El Niño-influenced storms. Trouillas, who has a photographic memory, remembered reading about it in an old manual.

An almond tree near Fresno infected with the pathogen Phytophthora syringae. The pathogen is usually found in tree roots but intense storms created the right conditions for the pathogen to "swim" up trunks. Photo by Emily C. Dooley, UC Davis

“It's rare for California and one that we see mostly following atmospheric rivers,” he says.

“The disease will only happen following these extremely wet winters.”

Phytophthora is soilborne, mostly found in tree roots, and doesn't generally spread up into branches. But the intense storms created the right conditions for the pathogen to “swim” up trunks as winds blew spores into the air and rain dropped them back down into the canopy, Trouillas said.

Some of the trees in this orchard will die; others can be saved by pruning infected branches and applying a recommended fungicide, he said.

Identification, diagnosis, education

Trouillas is one of more than 50 Cooperative Extension specialists at UC Davis and each is charged with identifying problems and developing solutions for those issues in support of agriculture, the ecosystem and communities throughout the state.

In his role, Trouillas focuses not only on pathology and research but also on educating growers, nursery staff, pest control advisers and others in agriculture about ways to manage potential threats and how to prevent crop damage.

Mohamed Nouri, an orchard systems advisor for UC Cooperative Extension San Joaquin County, and UC Davis plant pathologist Florent Trouillas gather samples in a cherry orchard in Lodi showing signs of bacterial canker. Photo by Jael Mackendorf, UC Davis

“His role is very crucial,” said Mohammad Yaghmour, an orchard systems advisor for UC Cooperative Extension Kern County. “He's not only on this mission to educate growers but he's also a source of education for us.”

Trouillas typically conducts one or two site visits a week, usually after a farm advisor reaches out about a problem they can't solve on their own.

“This allows us to be at the forefront of disease detections in California,” he said.

He likens these visits to house calls a doctor would make, only to fields instead. And one of those calls recently took him to a cherry orchard in Lodi.

“These guys help me quite a bit,” said Andrew Vignolo, a pest control adviser with Wilbur-Ellis who asked for a consult. “I bug them a lot.”

The visit starts like any consult in a doctor's office, only the questions come fast as they walk around the Lodi orchard where branches are dying, there is gumming and the trees appear stressed. Some look to be sunburned from exposure. Old pruning wounds show cankers, indicating that past disease treatments didn't get rid of whatever was affecting the trees.

Trouillas asks about the cultivar of the trees because some varieties are more susceptible to pests or diseases. He focuses on stress because that opens the door to disease.

Do they prune in the dormant winter months or in summer when pathogens are more prevalent? Does the soil get tested? How old are the trees? What about nutrition?

“I'm trying to figure out how they got infected so bad,” Trouillas said, walking the orchard. “Bacterial canker is a very mysterious disease.”

He thinks it might be a bacterial canker disease and shaves some bark to take to the lab for testing. He wants to come back next winter to take some samples to see where the pathogen is overwintering.

“We'll know in a few weeks if we have a fighting chance,” Vignolo said.

Be it Lodi, Fresno or elsewhere in the state, Trouillas focuses on local conditions. But what is learned in one field can be passed on to others, providing early warnings or advice for those in similar situations. “All these efforts at collaboration, from the field, to the lab, going through research projects, there's only one goal here — to help the farmers of California.”

Learn About California Agriculture

Join us on Thursday, May 21st, 9:30 am PST, for Part 2 of a webinar series on California agriculture, where we'll learn about major crops and production areas. This webinar will feature UCCE Ventura County advisors Andre Biscaro and Ben Faber. Watch it live or view after on YouTube. Part 1 is up. This is an ideal webinar series for the home classroom.

Photo by Adele Payman on Unsplash

Fumigants and Non-Fumigant Alternatives: Regulatory & Research Updates

Growers, PCAs, applicators and supervisors of fumigant and non-fumigant technologies and decision makers should plan to attend this free, virtual educational outreach event, scheduled for Monday May 29th from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. This workshop is open to the public. Although targeted to strawberries, most of the learning will generally apply to other crops. The program is being hosted by Dr. Oleg Daugovish, who serves as the Strawberry and Vegetable Crop Advisor for UCCE Ventura County. 

Topics include:

• Most pertinent regulatory requirements for fumigant use and application
• Industry updates on fumigant and non-fumigant tools use
• Fumigant application based on need within fields
• Soil-borne pathogen management

Continuing Education Units are available: 1.5 hours of "Other" and 1.0 hours of laws and regulations have been applied for from California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR).

Registration is required and participants will receive a link and instructions prior to the workshop. Register here.

Dr. Oleg Daugovish

Announcing Treemendous Learning Webinars for Middle and High School Students

Join us on alternate Tuesdays in May and June, 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm, for this opportunity designed for middle and high school students. Treemendous Tuesdays is a collaboration of U.S. Forest Service, Los Angeles Center for Urban Natural Resources, California Project Learning Tree, California 4-H, and UC Agriculture & Natural Resources

Five webinars will be hosted every other week starting May 5 and ending June 30. These events are free and registration is required.