- Author: Anne Schellman
Mark your calendar for Tuesday, November 28, 2023! Giving Tuesday is an opportunity for you to make a donation to a program that has made a difference in your life.
We invite you to support us in our quest to promote healthier gardens, people, and more sustainable landscapes.
Here are some photos of our UC Cooperative Extension Master Gardeners in action helping make Stanislaus County a better place.
- Author: Janet Hartin
Benefits of Plants to People, Communities and Urban Ecosystems: Part 1:
The link between horticulture and health and well-being and to urban ecosystems has been scientifically documented for centuries. In 1812, psychiatrist, professor, and Declaration of Independence signer Dr. Benjamin Rush reported in his book “Medical Inquiries and Observations, Upon the Diseases of the Mind” (Rush 1812) that patients “digging in the dirt”
Benefits related to cognitive functioning, societal and community health, and mental health are summarized below. Ecosystem and physical health benefits from interacting with nature will be discussed in next month's blog.
Improved Cognitive Functioning
Several studies link participation in gardening activities to enhanced cognitive functioning (Bratman et al. 2012; Dadvand et al. 2015; Kuo et al. 2021; Ohly et al. 2016; Park et al. 2019; Stevenson et al. 2018; Wells 2000. Research conducted by Kuo and Sullivan (2001) and Mayer et al. (2009) found that exposure to nature in urban settings can enhance attention span, working memory, and concentration. Both youth and adults who participate in greening and gardening projects were also found to have higher cognitive functioning in the areas of short and long term memory, focus and concentration (Dadvand et al. 2015; Markevych et al. 2019; Matsuoka 2010; Meuwese et al. 2021; Park et al. 2019; Stevenson et al. 2018) and reduced symptoms of ADHD (Faber Taylor and Kuo (2011).
Other studies summarized in a literature review (Williams and Dixon 2013) found that kindergarten and middle school students who participated in school gardening activities linked to classroom learning in biology, nutrition, mathematics, and other subjects earned higher grades and attained greater academic achievement than non-participants. A recent study linked high tree canopy coverage on school grounds with higher achievement scores in math and reading in middle school students across a wide range of socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds (Kuo et al. 2021). The experiential (hands-on) learning elements of school gardens can also bridge the gap between traditional and non-traditional learners due to its multi-sensory nature (Kolb and Kolb 2005). School gardens play an especially important academic role among elementary-aged youth from low-wealth inner city communities exposed to outdoor experiential learning that was previously lacking (Dyg et al. 2020; Kuo et al. 2021; Ray et al. 2016; Williams et al. 2013). However, Hoover et al. (2021) found that successful, sustainable school gardens require strong administrative and district support in addition to enthusiasm and support from parents and teachers.
Enhancement of Societal and Community Health
Urban greening projects that remediate vacant land, landscape streets and neighborhoods, create community gardens, and improve the health of wetlands and undeveloped natural environments can build community cohesiveness, neighborhood bonding, and mutual community pride (Diamant and Waterhouse 2010; Draper 2010; Glover et al. 2005; Hartwig and Mason 2016; Kuo and Sullivan 2001; Moyer et al. 2019; Neo and Chua 2017; Saldivar-Tanaka and Krasny 2004). With blighted uncared-for vacant lots comprising nearly 15% of total land area of U.S. cities (Branas et al. 2018) these opportunities are substantial. Results also indicate that gardening and urban greening projects unite people from different cultural and ethnic backgrounds who enjoy growing and sharing produce from their native regions (Agustina and Beilin 2012; Baker 2004; Cruz-Piedrahita et al. 2020; Dyg et al. 2016; Hartwig and Mason 2016; Teig 2009). Building a sense of community through social engagement, celebrations, and communal meals has also been found to benefit both gardeners and non-gardener participants (Ober et al. 2008).
Well-designed and maintained urban green spaces not only bring people together, but can reduce crime, gun violence and enhance the safety and cohesiveness of urban neighborhoods, as summarized in several literature reviews (Bogar and Byer 2016: Mancus and Campbell 2018; Shepley et al. 2019). Some of the strongest links reported in the literature involve crime reduction in vegetated and well maintained urban neighborhoods and walkways (Branas et al. 2018; Demotto 2006; Garvin et al. 2013; Locke et al. 2017) and a reduction in gun violence in neighborhoods with green spaces including trees (Branas et al. 2018; Kondo 2017; Schertz et al. 2021; Wolfe et al. 2012). One study found that community-based greening projects that vegetated vacant lots was an effective strategy to improve neighborhood safety, resulting in a nearly 40% decrease in violent crime (Heinze et al. 2018). It should be noted that other researchers (Groff and McCord 2012) found a higher incidence of opportunistic crime in high tree canopy covered areas, perhaps due to concealed illegal activities. Another study found that actively participating in community greening projects from design through implementation and maintenance can result in a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction (Murphy-Dunning 2009). Neighbors caring for urban green spaces together also tend to spend more time conversing and building important social relationships than do non-participants (Peters et al. 2010).
Improved Mental Health
Multiple literature reviews link interactions with nature to improved mental health in both youth and adults (Bowler et al. 2010; Clatworthy et al. 2013; Coventry et al. 2021; Cruz-Piedrahita et. al. 2020; De Vries et al. 2003; Tillmann et al. 2018) in studies conducted in parks, gardens, urban green spaces, and even shopping malls. The restorative impact of simply viewing plants has also been widely studied. Walking through a park and even viewing a natural scene through a window can lead to a sense of well-being, restfulness, reflection, and reduced mental fatigue (Shanahan et al. 2019). More recently, Dzhambov et al. (2020) found lower rates of depression in students homebound for long periods of time during the COVID-19 pandemic with views of plants (indoors and out) compared to students who lacked plant interactions. Bowler's (2010) literature review also highlighted strong associations for self-reported positive emotions and lower levels of anger and sadness in natural settings compared to non-natural settings. Interactions with nature can also reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety (Beyer et al. 2014; Gonzalez et al. 2010; Lee and Maheswaran 2011; Van den Berg and Custers 2011; Wilson and Christensen (2011).
Thompson Coon et al. (2011) reported that exercising outdoors in natural settings led to greater feelings of positivity and revitalization, less tension, anger, and depression compared to the same amount of exercise indoors. Other studies link gardening to feelings of peace and contentment (Meuwese et al. 2021; Shanahan et al. 2015; Shanahan et al. 2019). MacKerron and Mourato (2013) reported that individuals who interact with nature are often happier than those lacking this interaction and Ambrose et al. (2020) reported that home gardeners growing food crops experienced particularly high levels of happiness and meaningfulness. Bakolis et al. (2018) linked two elements of mental well-being (optimism and energy) to interactions with nature while Van den Berg and Clusters (2011) and Wood et al. (2016) found a link between engagement with nature and a reduction in stress. While White et al. (2019) determined that these benefits are maximized when individuals spend 120 minutes a week or more interacting with nature, shorter periods of exposure are also beneficial (Shanahan et al. 2016; Shanahan et al. 2019; White et al. 2019).
Other studies reported a link between growing food and a deepened sense of purpose (Tzoulas 2007; Wiesinger 2006). Digging in the soil can be a welcome distraction from busy lives laden with deadlines, traffic jams, and other everyday stressors. Focusing on the needs of plants, whether it be watering, fertilizing, harvesting or other tasks, can prove pleasantly distracting, providing time for reflection and even problem resolution (Capaldi et al. 2015; Meuwese et al. 2021; Stevenson et al. 2018). Several research papers report important positive roles that plants play related to mental health as impacts of climate change increase (Cryder et al. 2006; Dillman-Hasso et al. 2021; Doherty 2018; Fernandez et al. 2015) related to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, stress, anxiety and others.
Literature Cited
Agustina I and Beilin R. 2012. Community gardens: Space for interactions and adaptations, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 36:439-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.048
Ambrose G, Das K, Fan Y, Ramaswami A. 2020. Is gardening associated with greater happiness of urban residents? A multi-activity, dynamic assessment in the Twin-Cities region, USA, Landscape and Urban Planning,198(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103776
Baker LE. 2004. Tending cultural landscapes and food citizenship in Toronto's community gardens. Geographical Review, 94(3):305-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2004.tb00175.x
Bakolis I, Hammoud, R, Smythe, M, et al. 2018. Using Smartphone Technologies to Investigate the Impact of Nature on Mental Well-Being in Real Time, BioScience. 68:134–145, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix149
Beyer KM, Kaltenbach A, Szabo A, et al. 2014. Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 11:3453-3472. https://doi.org:10.3390/ijerph110303453
Bogar S. and Beyer K. 2016. Green space, violence, and crime: a systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 17(2)160-171. Accessed Sept. 28, 2021 from: http://journals.sagepub.com.proxyau.wrlc.org/doi/pdf/10.1177/1524838015576412
Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali, L, Knight TM, Pullin AS. 2010. Urban greening to cool towns and cities, A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(3):147–155. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-456
Branas C, South E, Kondo M, Hohl B, Bourgois P, Wiebe D, MacDonald J. 2018. Citywide cluster randomized trial to restore blighted vacant land and its effects on violence, crime, and fear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/02/20/1718503115
Bratman GN, Hamilton JP, Daily GC. 2012. The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1249:118–136. https://doi.org:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x
Capaldi CA, Passmore H, Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Dopko RL. 2015. Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(4):1-16. https://doi.org:10.5502/ijw.v5i4.1
Clatworthy J, Hinds J, Camic P. 2013. Gardening as a mental health intervention: a review. Mental Health Review. 18 (4):214-225. https://doi.org:10.1108/MHRJ-02-2013-0007
Coventry PA, Jennifer VE, Brown J, et al. 2021. Nature-based outdoor activities for mental and physical health: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Popul Health.1;16:100934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100934
Cruz-Piedrahita C, Howe C, de Nazelle A. 2020. Public health benefits from urban horticulture in the global north: A scoping review and framework, Global Transitions 2:246-256 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.10.001
Cryder CH, Kilmer RP, Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. 2006. An exploratory study of posttraumatic growth in children following a natural disaster. Am J Orthopsychiatry 76(1):65–69. https://doi.org:doi:10.1037/0002-9432.76.1.65
Dadvand P, Nieuwenhuijsen, MJ, Esnaola M, et al. 2015. Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(26):7937–7942. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503402112
Demotto N, and Davies CP. 2006. A GIS analysis of the relationship between criminal offenses and parks in Kansas City, Kansas. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci.33:141-157. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304006777681715
De Vries S, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P. 2003. Natural environments-healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and planning. 35(10):1717–1731. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35111
Diamant E and Waterhouse A. 2010. Gardening and belonging: reflections on how social and therapeutic horticulture may facilitate health, wellbeing and inclusion. Br J Occup Ther.73:84-88. https:doi.org: https://doi.org/10.4276/030802210X12658062793924
Dillman-Hasso N. 2021. The nature buffer: the missing link in climate change and mental health research. J Environ Stud Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00669-2
Doherty TJ. 2018. Individual impacts and resilience. In: Clayton S, Manning C (eds) Psychology and Climate Change. Academic Press, pp 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813130-5.00010-2
Draper C and Freedman D. 2010. Review and Analysis of the Benefits, Purposes, and Motivations Associated with Community Gardening in the United States, Journal of Community Practice. 8(4):458-492. https://doi:10.1080/10705422.2010.519682
Dzhambov AM, Lercher P, Browning MH, et al. 2020. Does greenery experienced indoors and outdoors provide an escape and support mental health during the COVID-19 quarantine? Environmental Research, 110420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110420
Dyg P, Christensen S, Peterson C. 2020. Community gardens and wellbeing amongst vulnerable populations: a thematic review, Health Promotion International, Volume 35, Issue 4, August 2020, Pages 790–803, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz067
Faber Taylor A and Kuo FE. 2011. Could exposure to everyday green spaces help treat ADHD? Evidence from children's play settings. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3: 281-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01052.x
Fernandez A, Black J, Jones M, Wilson L, Salvador-Carulla L, Astell-Burt T, Black D. 2015. Flooding and mental health: a systematic mapping review. PLoS One https://doi.org:10(4):e0119929
Garvin EC, Cannuscio CC, Branas CC. 2013. Greening vacant lots to reduce violent crime: A randomised controlled trial. Inj Prev. 19:198–203. https://doi.org:10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040439
Glover TD, Shinew KJ, Parry DC. 2005. Association, sociability, and civic culture: the democratic effect of community gardening. Leis Sci. 2005;27(1):75–92. https://doi.org:10.1080/01490400590886060
Gonzalez MT, Hartig T, Patil GG, Martinsen EW, Kirkevold M. 2010. Therapeutic horticulture in clinical depression: a prospective study of active components. J Adv Nurs. 66:2002-2013. https://doi.org:10.1891/1541-6577.23.4.312
Groff, E and McCord ES. 2012. The role of neighborhood parks as crime generators. Secur. J. 25:1–24, https://doi.org:10.1057/SJ.2011.1
Hartwig, KA and Mason M. 2016. Gardens for refugee and immigrant communities as a means of health promotion. J. Community Health, 41 (6):1153-1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0195-5
Heinze JE, Krusky-Morey A, Vagi KJ, Reischl TM Franzen S, Pruett NK, Cunningham RM, Zimmerman MA. 2018. Busy streets theory: the effects of community-engaged greening on violence. American journal of community psychology, 62(1-2):101–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12270
Hoover, Amy, Vandyousefi Sarvenaz, Martin Bonnie, et al. 2021. Barriers, Strategies, and Resources to Thriving School Gardens, J Nutr Educ Behav. 53(7):591-601. https://doi.org/10.1016.j.jneb.2021.02.011
Kolb DA and Kolb AY. 2005. Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2):193-212. Accessed Sept. 16 2021: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40214287.
Kondo MC, South EC, Branas CC, Richmond TS, Wiebe D.J. 2017. The association between urban tree cover and gun assault: a case-control and case-crossover study. American Journal of Epidemiology 186(3):289-296. https://doi.org:10.1093/aje/kwx096
Kuo M, Klein SE, Browning MH, Zaplatosch J. 2021. Greening for academic achievement: Prioritizing what to plant and where, Landscape and Urban planning, 206(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103962
Kuo F.E.; Sullivan W.C. 2001. Environment and Crime in the Inner City—Does Vegetation Reduce Crime? Environ. Behav. 33(343). https://doi.org:10.1177/0013916501333002
Lee, ACK and Maheswaran, R. 2011. The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. Journal of Public Health, 33(2), 212-222. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
Locke DH, Han S, Kondo MC, Murphy-Dunning C, Cox M. 2017. Did community greening reduce crime? Evidence from New Haven, CT, 1996–2007. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017;161:72–79. https://doi.org:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.006
MacKerron G and Mourato S. 2013. Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change. 23(5):992-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010
Mancus GC and Campbell J. 2018. Integrative review of the intersection of green space and neighborhood violence. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 50:117–125. https://doi.org:10.1111/jnu.12365
Markevych, I. Feng, X. Astell-Burt T. Standl M. Sugiri D. Schikowski, et al. 2019. Residential and school greenspace and academic performance: Evidence from the GINIplus and LISA longitudinal studies of German adolescents. Environ. Pollut. 245:71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.053
Matsuoka RH. 2010. Student performance and high school landscapes: Examining the links. Landsc. Urban Plan. 97:273-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.06.011
Mayer FS, Frantz CM, Bruehlman-Senecal E, Dolliver K. 2009. Why Is Nature Beneficial? The Role of Connectedness to Nature. Environment and Behavior.41(5):607-643. https://doi.org:10.1177/0013916508319745
Meuwese D, Maas J, Krabbendam L, Dijkstra K. 2021. Viewing Nature Lets Your Mind Run Free: Three Experiments about the Influence of Viewing a Nature Video on Cognitive Coping with Psychological Distress. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 22;18(16):8842. https://doi.org:10.3390/ijerph18168842
Moyer R, MacDonald JM, Ridgeway G, Branas CC. 2019. Effect of remediating blighted vacant land on shootings: a citywide cluster randomized trial. Am. J. Public Health.109:140–144. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304752
Neo H and Chua CY. 2017. Beyond inclusion and exclusion: community gardens as spaces of responsibility. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 107(3):666-681. https://doi.org:10.1080/24694452.2016.1261687
Ober J, et al. 2008. Growing vegetables and values: benefits of neighborhood-based community gardens for youth development and nutrition, Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 3(4):418-439, https://doi.org:10.1080/19320240802529169
Ohly H, White MP, Wheeler BW, et al. 2016. Attention restoration theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 19 (7):305-343, https://doi.org:10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155
Park, SA, Lee AY, Park H, Lee WL. 2019. Benefits of Gardening Activities for Cognitive Function According to Measurement of Brain Nerve Growth Factor Levels. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(5):760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050760
Ray R, Fisher DR, Fisher-Maltese C. 2016. School gardens in the city. Does environmental equity help close the achievement gap?. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 13(2):379-395. Accessed Sept. 15, 2021 from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X16000229
Rush B. Medical inquiries and observations upon diseases of the mind. Philadelphia: Kimber & Richardson; 1812. [Accessed August 28, 2010]. p. 226. Available at: http://deila.dickinson.edu/theirownwords/title/0034.htm
Saldivar-Tanaka L and Krasny ME. 2004. Culturing community development, neighborhood open space, and civic agriculture: the case of Latino community gardens in New York City. Agric. Hum. Val., 21 (4):399-412. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHUM.0000047207.57128.a5
Schertz KE, Saxon J, Cardenas-Iniguez C, et al. 2021. Neighborhood street activity and greenspace usage uniquely contribute to predicting crime. npj Urban Sustain.1(19). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-020-00005-7
Shanahan DF, Astell-Burt T, Barber EA, Brymer E, et al. 2019. Nature-based interventions for improving health and wellbeing: the purpose, the people and the outcomes. Sports (Basel)10;7(6):141. http://doi.org:10.3390/sports7060141
Shanahan DF, Fuller RA, Bush R, Lin BB, Gaston KJ. 2015. The health benefits of urban nature: how much do we need? BioScience 65(5):476–485. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv032
Shepley M, Sachs N, Sadatsafavi H, Fournier C, Peditto K. 2019. The impact of green space on violent crime in urban environments: An evidence synthesis. Int. J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(24):5119. https://doi.org:10.3390/ijerph16245119
Stevenson MP, Schilhab T, Bentsen P. 2018. Attention restoration theory II: A systematic review to clarify attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 21(4):227-268. https://doi.org:10.1080/10937404.2018.1505571
Teig E, Amulya J, Bardwell L, et al. 2009. Collective efficacy in Denver, Colorado: Strengthening neighborhoods and health through community gardens. Health & Place, 15(4): 1115-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.003
Thompson Coon J, Boddy K, Stein R, et al. 2011. Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review. https://doi.org:10.1021/es102947t
Tillmann S, Tobin D, Avison W, Gilliland J. 2018. Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: a systematic review. J Epidemiol. Community Health 72(10):958–966. https://doi.org:10.1136/jech-2018-210436
Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S. 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007;81:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
Van den Berg AE and Custers MH. 2011. Gardening promotes neuroendocrine and affective restoration from stress. J. Health Psychol.16:3–11https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310365577
Wiesinger G, Neuhauser F, Putz M. 2006. Farming for health in Austrian Farms, horticultural therapy, animal-assisted therapy. In: Hassink J., Dijk M., editors. Farming for health: Green-Care farming across Europe and the United States of America. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 233–248. Wells, NM. 2000. At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children's cognitive functioning. Environ. Behav.32(6):775–795. https://doi.org:10.1177/00139160021972793
White MP, Alcock I, Grellier J. et al. 2019. Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Sci Rep 9(7730). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3
Wilson JF and Christensen KM. 2011. The relationship between gardening and depression among individuals with disabilities. J. Ther. Hortic. 2011;21:28–41.
Williams DR, Dixon PS. 2013. Impact of Garden-Based Learning on Academic Outcomes in Schools: Synthesis of Research Between 1990 and 2010. Review of Educational Research. 2013;83(2):211-235. http://doi.org:10.3102/0034654313475824
Wolfe MK, Mennis J, Mennis J. 2012. Does vegetation encourage or suppress urban crime? Evidence from Philadelphia, PA. Landsc Urban Plan.108(2-4):112–122. https://doi.org:10.1016/j.landurplan.2012.08.006
Wood C.J., Pretty J., Griffin M. 2016. A case–control study of the health and well-being benefits of allotment gardening. J. Public Health. 38:336–e344. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdv146
Wolch, J, Byrne, J Newell, J. 2014. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities `just green enough'. 125:234-244. https://doi.org10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
- Author: Jeannette Warnert
A team of California and Nevada fire scientists have produced a booklet with step-by-step guidance on retrofitting an existing home to be more resilient to fire.
Susie Kocher, UC Cooperative Extension forestry and natural resources advisor and co-author of the new guide, said some homeowners feel powerless to protect their homes against California's increasing wildfire threat.
“I'm happy to tell them that's not true. There are specific actions that we can all take to reduce the likelihood of our homes being burned in wildfire,” said Kocher, who lives in a forested area near Lake Tahoe. “We need to educate ourselves on the details of home construction that make homes less vulnerable to ignition.”
The free 20-page publication, How to Harden Homes against Wildfire (http://ucanr.edu/HomeRetrofitGuide) is now available online. It includes recommendations for 12 vulnerable components of homes in wildfire-prone areas, including roofs, gutters, vents, siding, windows, decks and fences.
In the past, agencies have focused on recommending changes in vegetation and establishing defensible space. However, Kocher said recent advances in wildfire science have exposed vulnerabilities of structures themselves.
“Managing vegetation and retrofitting the home are both needed to decrease wildfire risk and help our communities become more fire adapted,” she said.
CAL FIRE awarded funding to develop and publish the wildfire home retrofit guide, funding that is part of California Climate Investments, a statewide program that assigns cap-and-trade dollars to projects that aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, strengthen the economy and improve public health and the environment.
In addition to CAL FIRE, organizations that contributed to the document are University of Nevada, Reno Extension; University of California Cooperative Extension; Living with Fire, Tahoe; Tahoe Fire and Fuels Team; Tahoe Resource Conservation District; and Tahoe Network of Fire Adapted Communities.
The team also hosted three webinars to share home fire resilience information targeted to different audiences. Videos of the webinars are available on the Living with Fire YouTube Channel:
For the public: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX114wpPwmg&t=327s
For building professionals: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccIAIg6xONs
For fire educators: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOsdyVSPxnA&t=177s
UC Agriculture and Natural Resources brings the power of UC to all 58 counties. Through research and Cooperative Extension in agriculture, natural resources, nutrition, economic and youth development, our mission is to improve the lives of all Californians. Learn more at ucanr.edu.
- Author: Jeannette Warnert
During periods of "extreme fire conditions," PG&E will shut off electric power lines to prevent wildfires, reported Dale Kasler in the Sacramento Bee.
The reporter spoke to Lenya Quinn-Davidson, UC Cooperative Extension area fire advisor in Northern California, about the utility's proposed actions. She said PG&E will have to give communities plenty of advance warning before turning off power so residents aren't left without a means of receiving emergency information.
"They're going to have to do a lot of good community outreach so people will be prepared," she said. Still, she called it "a reasonable short-term solution while they're figuring out other things" to reduce fire risks.
- Author: Janet White
Original research and literature reviews on these subjects appear in the January-March 2013 California Agriculture, UC’s peer-reviewed research journal of research in agriculture, natural and human resources (http://www.californiaagriculture.ucanr.edu).
UC Agriculture and Natural Resources (ANR) has launched a strategic initiative to help California youth. Called Healthy Families and Communities, it includes research and programs to encourage healthy lifestyles, boost science literacy, and foster positive youth development. Delaine Eastin, former State Superintendent of Public Instruction, notes, “At the end of the day, the Healthy Families and Communities Strategic Initiative is about change, scientifically measurable change, yielding concrete evidence of youth improvement due to these efforts.”
In addition, each year about 100,000 California youth who reach graduation age fail to graduate from high school, a predictor of their future social and financial difficulties as well as a missed opportunity for training skilled workers to replace those close to retirement. Finally, California’s eighth-grade science scores ranked 47th among the states in the National Assessment of Educational Progress’s 2011 report. A workforce with the knowledge and skills for scientific careers is critical to the state’s economy, and to full participation in today’s technological society.
Confronting these complex issues requires a multifaceted approach that leads to strategic change, says David Campbell, UC Cooperative Extension specialist in the Department of Human and Community Development at UC Davis and leader of ANR’s new youth-focused initiative.
“We’re bringing a lot of people together across disciplines,” he says. “If our work is going to be relevant to the real world, we need to reflect its complexity.”
As part of the initiative, UC researchers are partnering with schools and youth organizations in controlled studies to learn what works in the real world.
Summaries of projects and links to articles:
Integrating local agriculture into nutrition programs can benefit children's health (page 30). Sheri Zidenberg-Cherr, UCCE specialist in the Department of Nutrition at UC Davis, leads a K-6 nutrition education effort, called Shaping Healthy Choices. Designed to both improve child health and support local agriculture, the program incorporates serving regional fruits and vegetables, a school garden, and classroom nutrition and physical fitness lessons. In this controlled four-year study, investigators have matched schools in Northern and Central California, and will compare those that are implementing the program with those that are not.
Communitywide strategies key to preventing childhood obesity (page 13). According to Pat Crawford, UCCE specialist in the Department of Nutritional Science and Toxicology at UC Berkeley, increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables is important but not enough by itself to combat obesity. Two of the strongest factors driving obesity are sweetened beverages and fast food, and decreasing their consumption is just as important as increasing the consumption of healthy foods. “You have to do both,” she says.
Her team at the Center for Weight and Health in Berkeley, with funding from ANR, is evaluating Team Up for Good Health, a community-based approach to preventing obesity in elementary school children. Investigators are studying fourth- and fifth-grade participants in school and after-school obesity prevention programs, using body mass index (BMI) reductions after two years as a measure of success.
Lessons of Fresh Start can guide schools seeking to boost student fruit consumption (page 21). In 2005, California became the first state to address the availability of fresh and local produce in the federal School Breakfast Program through state funding. This evaluation of the California Fresh Start program reveals lessons that are especially important now, as schools across the country prepare to increase the number of fruits and vegetables offered in the School Breakfast Program by July 2014 as part of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.
Inquiry-based learning (pages 47 and 54). Another innovative aspect of these UC programs is the curriculum. Based upon inquiry-based learning, it captures the attention of students by focusing on the real world and children’s day-to-day lives. For example, in the Shaping Healthy Choices program (page 30), a lesson on food labels at school will be followed by students comparing food labels on their own, at home and in grocery stores. “Application is what makes learning stick,” says Martin Smith, UCCE specialist in the School of Veterinary Medicine who works on youth science literacy. “Inquiry-based learning takes longer, but it’s deeper — kids own the knowledge because they figured it out themselves.”
Positive youth development merits state investment (page 38). A team of UC researchers reviews studies supporting a new paradigm for youth programs, and proposes increased state investment in this area. Research over the last 30 years has shifted thinking away from the deficit model, in which researchers and practitioners considered high-risk youth behaviors to be their focus, and toward promotion of positive patterns. “Far too many California youth are not thriving,” the authors note. “Promotion of healthy pathways to college, work and community engagement is of urgent concern.” They cite findings that positive youth development is linked to improved school achievement, higher graduation rates, and fewer risk behaviors.
The entire January-March 2013 issue can be downloaded at http://californiaagriculture.ucanr.edu.
California Agriculture is the University of California’s peer-reviewed journal of research in agricultural, human and natural resources. For a free subscription, go to: http://californiaagriculture.ucanr.edu, or write to calag@ucanr.edu.
WRITERS/EDITORS: To request a hard copy of the journal, e-mail crllopez@ucanr.edu.