The students, along with the three winners in the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences category, received their awards at a recent ceremony in the UC Davis Shields Library Courtyard.
A paper written by Maram Saada, a student in a longevity class taught by UC Davis distinguished professor James R. Carey, won first place in the SEM category and a $1000 prize. Saada's research paper, “Huntington's Disease: Etiology, Research Models and Treatment,” is now online. It will be published in eScholarship, an open-access scholarly publishing service affiliated with the University of California.
Second place in the SEM category went to Jocelyn Chu, a student in a medical entomology class taught by assistant professor Geoffrey Attardo, for her paper, “Vector-borne Disease Control Plan for West Nile Virus in California.” She received $750.
Two of Carey's students, Jessica Hevener and David Vo, tied for third place in the SEM category. Hevener, of Carey's longevity class, submitted her paper on “The Impact of Maternal Obesity on Maternal and Offspring Health,” while Vo, enrolled in a special study class for advanced undergraduates, entered his paper on “Surviving the Cold: How Circumpolar Peoples Have Adapted to the Extreme Conditions of the Arctic Entomology." They shared the third-prize award of $500.
The Lang Prize competition recognizes students who make exceptional use of library resources and services — such as primary source materials and special collections, online databases and journal articles; inter-library loan services, or consulting with a librarian, according to Alesia McManus, chair of the Lang Prize for Undergraduate Information Research and head of student services, UC Davis Shields Library.
In a earlier news release, McManus announced that “It was a strong pool of applications, with 17 out of the 21 applications meeting the average 39.99 score threshold for being considered for an award." The Lang Prize honors the legacy of professor emeritus and plant biologist Norma Lang, 1931-2015, a member of the faculty from 1963 to 1991.
UC Davis Distinguished Professor James R. Carey. Carey, a member of the UC Davis entomology faculty since 1980, instructs undergraduates in his classes--which usually exceed 200 students--how to research topics, use style sheets, and structure their papers. He has produced 13 videos on how to research and write a research paper, along with a new video on the use of style sheets.
Highly honored by his peers for his teaching expertise, Carey received the Entomological Society of America's 2015 Distinguished Teaching Award; a 2018 Robert Foster Cherry Award from Baylor University, which presents international teaching awards; and the UC Davis Academic Senate's 2014 Distinguished Teaching Award, an honor given to internationally recognized professors who excel at teaching.
Carey is considered the preeminent global authority on arthropod demography. He directed the multidisciplinary, 11-institution, 20-scientist program, “Biodemographic Determinants of Lifespan,” which garnered more than $10 million in funding from the National Institute on Aging from 2003 to 2013.
Assistant Professor Geoffrey Attardo. UC Davis medical entomologist-geneticist Geoffrey Attardo, who joined the UC Davis Department of Entomology and Nematology in 2017 from the Yale School of Public Health's Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, is a global expert on vectorborne diseases, and renowned for his groundbreaking work on tsetse flies. The Attardo lab monitors the dynamics of vector insects at the levels of physiology, population genetics and environmental interactions.
Attardo, who won the 2022 Medical, Urban, and Veterinary Entomology (MUVE) Award from the Pacific Branch, Entomological Society of America, “excels not only as a researcher, but as a teacher, mentor, scientific illustrator, macro photographer,videographer and science communicator,” said UC Davis distinguished professor Bruce Hammock in his letter of nomination for the MUVE Award. Attardo drew praise for his "highly effective teaching style in helping students build critical thinking skills and confidence."
(Editor's Note: Forest entomologist Malcolm Furniss of Moscow, Idaho, researched the life of noted scientific illustrator Mary Foley Benson, 1905-1992. In her later years, she served as an illustrator for the UC Davis Department of Entomology.)
By Malcolm M. Furniss
My introduction to the work of scientific illustrator Mary Foley Benson (1905–1992) was happenstance. I am a forest entomologist, engaged for many years in research on bark beetles and associated organisms, including parasitoid Hymenoptera. Since 1963, I have resided in Moscow, Idaho, and have had ties with the former Bureau of Entomology laboratory at Coeur d'Alene, 90 miles to the north. There, Donald De Leon had studied Coeloides dendroctoni Cushman, a braconid preying on larvae of a scolytine, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, in western white pine. While reading his publication on the braconid's biology, I admired the drawing of a female wasp credited to Mary Foley (Fig. 1). A colleague noted my curiosity about this artist and called my attention to a photo of her in 1926 at age 21 (Fig. 2), when she was employed as a scientific illustrator with USDA. Subsequent inquiry led to discovering Mary's connections to entomology, including close acquaintance of the renowned Smithsonian Diptera taxonomist, John Merton Aldrich (1866–1934) (Fig. 3). I share here an account of Mary's life, concluding with her finding fulfillment and support in the community of Davis, Calif.
Mary Carilla Foley was born on April 2, 1905 at Storm Lake, Buena Vista County, Iowa, to Guy William Foley and Cora Helen Walrod. She had a brother, Charles, who had a flying service at Roosevelt Field, Long Island, and who had a pivotal role in her early adult life. Mary's inherent artistic talent became apparent while in first grade when her drawing of a puppy drew praise from her teacher (Wellings 1992). From then on, Mary made art her life and never forgot that teacher's encouragement.
At age 17, she left her Midwest roots to live with close family friends, John Aldrich and his wife, Della, in Washington, DC. Her intent was to go to art school—until then, she had been largely self-taught—but first, she had to earn tuition money. “Uncle Merton,” as she fondly referred to Aldrich, got her a job as an entomological draftsman with the USDA Bureau of Entomology. She learned quickly and eventually became Chief Scientific Illustrator. In evenings, she took art classes, graduating from the National School of Fine and Applied Arts and later attended the Corcoran School of Art. The closeness of Mary and Aldrich was like father and daughter. The tragic loss of his young son (Furniss 2010) may have affected his feelings for Mary, who would not have been much older.
Road Trip West with John and Della Aldrich, 1927
Mary and the Aldriches departed Washington on May 29, 1927 (nine days after Lindberg's Atlantic flight) in their Chevrolet (Fig. 4) coach loaded down with camping gear and headed across the continent on an adventure of their own. Aldrich kept a meticulous, detailed diary. A typed copy was discovered at the University of Idaho, Department of Entomology after his death and published by Paul Arnaud Jr. (Aldrich 2001). References to Mary appear throughout the diary and provide rare personal recollections of her. Her relatives and her closest friend, Margaret Hoyt, had passed away prior to my interest in her biography.
Driving was shared; however, it became apparent that Mary liked to drive and John often complimented her skill, so she drove the most. Two days into the trip, Aldrich noted: “Mary made fast time, keeping around 45.” Mary had little opportunity to paint until they reached the Rocky Mountains and a place named Wagon Tongue where Aldrich began collecting flies. Here she made water color paintings of a flower (Doedecatheon) and others not identified. Later, near Wells, Nevada, John packed up two Schmitt boxes pinned so far on the trip and mailed them with several small boxes of unmounted flies to Washington: “… some thousands of Diptera to be worked over later at home. Some good things there, I know.”
Eventually, they reached California and entered Yosemite National Park via Tioga Pass on July 4, having to drive over a patch of remnant snow. Nearing Bridal Veil, they came to a bear beside the road being fed by others. Mary stepped forward to get in a photo, but the bear was in the shade. Aldrich asked her to move the bear into the sun. As she came close to him, he gave her a bite above the knee; however, it only roughened the skin. Afterward, they made light of the episode.
Mary departed at Portland by train to return to her job. As John and Della drove up the scenic Columbia River highway heading for Moscow, they reminisced about her and missed having her company; they wished that she could be there at every turn. After thousands of miles cramped together, she had, indeed, become family!
John Aldrich had met and married Della Smith in Moscow after the untimely death of his first wife, Ellen Roe, and infant son, Spencer. The Aldriches were in Moscow from July 19 to Aug. 4, 1927, visiting Della's relatives and some of his acquaintances from his time at the University of Idaho, 1893–1913. On Sept. 2, the travelers reached home after being gone since 29 May. Aldrich died seven years later while completing plans to start early in June on another of his biennial collecting trips to the Pacific Coast. He was buried beside Ellen and son Spencer in the cemetery at Moscow.
Mary's job at the Bureau of Entomology included painting insect-damaged crop plants such as appeared in the 1952 Yearbook of Agriculture (USDA 1952). Perhaps to break the boredom, she painted a parade of striped cucumber beetles across the office wall. Her boss was not amused (Wellings 1992). That phase of her life changed with marriage to Russell Benson, a patent lawyer and engineer with the US Patent Office, in 1928 and birth of a son, John, in 1931. In a Washington Post interview (Lewis 1937), she seemed to be living a normal life of a woman of the time “… keeping a home for her husband and small son, doing most of the cooking and making most of her own clothes.” They had designed their house in Georgian Colonial style with a studio for her painting. During the previous summer, she had laid a flagstone terrace while Russell built an outdoor fireplace. However, their relationship was less tranquil than it was portrayed.
Four years after her marriage, Mary had been given her first airplane ride by her brother, Charles, who had charge of one of the hangars at Roosevelt Field, Long Island (from where Lindberg had taken off on his Atlantic flight in 1927). That experience led to her taking flying lessons at the College Park, MD airport two or three times per week until receiving her pilot's license. Interviewed in later years, she divulged that she had kept her flying lessons secret from Russell (Wellings 1992). The marriage had become stressful and she found flying to be a great outlet from her exacting art work and her difficulties at home: “When I was flying, I left all my trouble on the ground. There was nobody up there but God and me.”
When Mary soloed in 1937, Charles gave her a J-2 Cub (Fig. 5). Her spirited nature showed in her flying: “I used to have such fun with it. Before I would land, I would wind it up with three giant loops in a row before they told me not to [not designed for aerobatics] (Haag 1983).” Owning an airplane expanded her involvement with flying. She became active in aviation organizations, including membership in The Ninety-Nines, an international organization for licensed women pilots founded by Amelia Earhart. She also joined the Washington Air Derby Association and placed second in her first air race, at College Park in May 1939 (Lewis 1937).
As World War II loomed, Mary's marriage was ending. Her son was in boarding school, so she joined Charles at his aviation business at Roosevelt Field, studied radio and navigation, became a member of the Civil Air Patrol and began ferrying airplanes for the War Training Service (Wellings 1992). She did not speak of her ferrying experiences except for saying that townsfolk came to see the woman flier after she was forced to land in a farm pasture and was waiting for a new propeller. She enlisted in the Women's Army Corps on Sept. 9, 1943 and instructed navigation to bomber crews in an on-ground Link Celestial Navigation Trainer. She regretted that women pilots were not allowed then to teach in the air.
When war ended, Mary relocated to Los Angeles where she attended Otis College of Art and Design from 1948–1951. Her training included instruction from Norman Rockwell, who spent the winter months there as artist-in-residence: “He was a wonderful person, with a fine sense of humor, and a scientific illustrator as well as a historian” (Tracy 1977). Afterward, she was a free-lance illustrator at Benson Studios. However, she did not attract the attention of newspaper reporters the way she had at Washington.
Home at Last … Davis
A great change came in 1964, when she was hired by Howard McKenzie at the University of California, Davis, as an illustrator for his monumental book on mealybugs (McKenzie 1967). She must have impressed him with her renditions of clearwing moths in Bulletin 190 of the U.S. National Museum (Engelhardt 1946) (Fig. 6). That publication contains 167 of her watercolor paintings of adult male and female clearwing moths and 87 line drawings of their genitalia. The paintings are eye-catching. When my nephew, Sean Furniss, saw them among the Engelhardt holdings at the Smithsonian, he was impressed with how real they appeared. I marvel that anyone could capture such natural colors by mixing pigment and rendering such life-like images with a brush.
Mary painted and drew mealybug illustrations for Howard McKenzie until his death in 1968. His 526-page treatise of California species has interspersed among its pages 21 of her watercolor paintings of species in their plant habitats (Fig. 7). The book also includes many of her line drawings of microscope slides of holotype adult females, split longitudinally by dorsal and ventral views (Fig. 8). The drawings include minute detail only seen by microscope at high magnification. Mary had become skilled in microscopy and, although not formally trained in entomology, she had to have learned much technical detail about what she was asked to draw. After McKenzie died, Douglass Miller completed two joint manuscripts containing illustrations by Mary (Miller and McKenzie 1971, 1973). Earlier, she had illustrated mealybugs in the monograph on the genus Asterolecanium by Russell (1941).
Announcement of publication of McKenzie's book noted that it had been illustrated by Mary and included her pedigree dating to her employment with USDA Bureau of Entomology in Washington DC during 1922-1928 as Chief Scientific Illustrator. Her presence in the community had already become known by her participation in Chamber of Commerce events, teaching painting techniques through the Davis adult education program and scientific illustration through the University of California Cooperative Extension.
In the years after McKenzie's death, she contracted a painting project for Harry Lange to illustrate a book on insects infesting California crops. The idea was to show both the insect and its host plant in realistic fashion. However, when Mary portrayed the plant, the accompanying insect was at the same scale, much too little to suit entomologist Lange. His wife, Ellen Lange, recalls that, “A real problem with depicting insects and plants is the difference in size. Harry Lange used to have battles with Mary about the plants being too big, i.e., emphasis on the plants versus the insects.” They resolved the problem by superimposing a “magnifying glass” to enlarge the insect (Fig. 9). The proposed publication never materialized; her 55 paintings are stored in the Bohart Museum of Entomology at Davis. In looking back, such paintings (and to some extent, drawings) were being replaced by digital photography and scanning electron microscopy.
Having retired from the Department of Entomology work, Mary (Fig. 10) said: “For the first time in my life, I can paint what I feel like painting most. I have always wanted to paint wildflowers, especially California wildflowers.” (Barr, 1992). She set about doing just that and put her paintings on display for sale at public places, gradually developing a devoted following. “This is the greatest place in the world for me. I get such support from the people of Davis. They hang my work all over town.” (Haag 1983).
An event in 1983 crowned her rise to prominence beyond the Davis community. At the Smithsonian's invitation, 45 of her paintings were displayed there during May-June, entitled, “Paintings of California Flora.” In her letter of Nov. 20, 1982 to Officer of Exhibits, William Haase, she listed the paintings, some of which included insects, that were to be sent and suggested the name California Flora for the exhibit. She singled out two of the paintings that merited special attention: “The Golden Lupine (Fig. 11) which grows around Davis, along the railroad track. It is almost extinct in the wild. There is some talk of making it the Davis city flower.” (She subsequently donated the original watercolor painting to the city.) And, “The second painting is the California poppy and wild oats. I had hoped to give it to our First Lady, Nancy Reagan, but could not decide just how to go about it. It seemed appropriate since the poppy is our state flower.” The letter concluded with a question regarding who should print the brochure for the show and that the paintings would be shipped by truck. She requested that, after the show, they should be sent to her residence at 1408 Claremont Drive, Davis. No one whom I contacted knew of the fate of these paintings. However, she evidently had prints made of some for sale. I noted one of her paintings being resold by Valley Auction on the Internet; it was number 123 of 500, entitled, “Indian Paint Brush and Fiddleback,” gathered from a vacant lot near her home. It portrays her eloquent, simplistic style that is so appealing to me.
Her dream of a Smithsonian exhibit having come true was timely. Her eyesight began failing soon after. She kept on painting but results were more abstract. During those challenging final years, she kept a positive outlook. As recalled in her obituary (Barr 1982) she said, “Life is like a stream; if you reach a stone you go around it. So now, I'm moving on after the stone.” Mary died at Davis on 18 June 1992 at age 87.
Sandra Kegley, Coeur d'Alene, ID, provided Fig. 2, which identified Mary and thereby initiated my interest in pursuing this article. Sean and Martha Furniss, Reston, VA, provided newspaper articles and searched the Smithsonian archives for information about Mary. Ellen Lange, Davis, CA, provided personal recollections of Mary and of her paintings for Harry Lange. Lynn Kimsey, Bohart Museum of Entomology, University of California, Davis, provided obituaries of Mary and a listing of Mary's paintings stored there. Amy Thompson, Special Collections and Archives Library, University of Idaho, provided the photo of Aldrich. Luc Leblanc, W.F. Barr Entomological Museum, University of Idaho, loaned references concerning Aldrich and Mary from the museum library. The manuscript was reviewed by Sandra Kegley, Ellen Lange, Linwood Laughy, and Douglass R. Miller, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA, Beltsville, MD.
Aldrich, J. M. 2001. Diary of a Western Trip, 1927. Myia - A publication on entomology 6:235-301. California Academy of Sciences.
Barr, P. 1992. Prominent Davis Artist Dies. Davis Enterprise. June 22.
De Leon, D. 1934. The Morphology of Coeloides dendroctoni Cushman (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal New York Entomological Society. XLII: 297-317.
Engelhardt, G. P. 1946. The North American Clear-Wing Moths of the Family Aegeriidae. Bulletin 90. U. S. National Museum. 222 pp.
Furniss, M. M. 2010. John Merton Aldrich (1866-1934) – A Forest Entomologist's View of Idaho's Renowned Fly Taxonomist. Latah Legacy 38:18-23.
Haag, J. 1983. A Californian's Floral Fantasy. The Sacramento Bee. July 24.
Lewis, R. 1937. Vocation and Avocation Combined by D. C. Artist. The Washington Post. October 17.
McKenzie, H. L. 1967. Mealybugs of California with Taxonomy, Biology and Control of North American Species (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). University of California Press, Berkeley. 525 pp.
Miller D. R., and H. L. McKenzie. 1971. Sixth Taxonomic Study of North American Mealybugs with Additional Species from South America. Hilgardia. 40:565-602.
Miller, D. R., and H. L. McKenzie, 1973. Seventh Taxonomic Study of North American Mealybugs (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). Hilgardia 41: 489-542.
Russell, L. M. 1941. A Classification of the Scale Insect Genus Asterolecanium. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publications 424: 1-319
Tracy R. L. 1977. Mary Foley Benson. Her Wildflower Paintings Are “Expression of Gratitude” The Sacramento Bee. August 20, 1977.
USDA 1952. The Yearbook of Agriculture. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Wellings, M. 1992. Davis Has Lost a Free Spirit. The Davis Enterprise. June 23.
Yes, if you use the term “personality” to refer to “intraspecific expression of behaviors that are stable over time and consistent across different situations,” says ecologist Richard “Rick” Karban, an international authority on plant communications and a distinguished professor in the UC Davis Department of Entomology and Nematology.
“Individual plants respond differently to alarm calls, just as individual animals do,” says Karban, a 40-year member of the UC Davis faculty who has studied plant communication in sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) since 1995 on his research site, located east of the Sierra Nevada mountain range.
In a newly published paper in the international peer-reviewed journal, Oecoogia, the UC Davis professor and two colleagues found that when plants tell their neighbors—via volatile cues—that they are under attack by herbivores, the plants showed consistent individual variation in how they perceived and responded to the cues, that is, how effectively they shored up their defenses.
“The gist of the argument here is that animal behaviorists have found it useful to recognize that individual animals show behavioral tendencies that are consistent under different circumstances and repeatable over time,” Karban explained. “So, for instance, some individuals are bolder or shyer in terms of issuing or responding to alarm calls. They have termed these individual tendencies 'personalities.' We have found similar consistent individual differences among sagebrush plants.”
The paper, titled “Consistent Individual Variation in Plant Communication: Do Plants Have Personalities?,” is co-authored by Patrick Grof-Tisza of the University of Eastern Finland and Charline Couchoux of the University of Quebec. Established in 1968, Oecoogia is one of the most cited ecology journals.
“Just as animal biologists have come to consider consistent individual personalities to be an important factor in shaping animal phenotypes, behaviors, and interactions, so, too, should plant biologists include individual variation in plant communication as a significant individual attribute that influences their evolution and ecology,” they noted.
In their abstract, they explained that “When animals sense danger, some individuals will alert neighbors with alarm calls and both calling and responding vary consistently among individuals. Plants, including sagebrush, emit volatile cues when they are attacked by herbivores and neighbors perceive these cues and reduce their own damage.”
They found that 5 percent of the variance in chewing damage “was attributable to the identity of the emitter that provided the cue. This fraction of variation was statistically significant and could not be attributed to the environmental conditions of the receiver. Effective receivers were also relatively effective emitters, indicating consistency across different situations. Pairs of receivers and emitters that were effective communicators in 2018 were again relatively effective in 2019, indicating consistency over time. These results suggest that plants have repeatable individual personalities with respect to alarm calls.”
In their paper, the scientists pointed out that the goal “in discussing plant personalities is not to insinuate that plants are people or are intelligent in a similar way that we are, but to highlight that animal behavior has much to offer the development of plant biology. Recognizing that plants exhibit consistent behaviors that are repeatable in different situations and stable over time (i.e., personalities) has several important consequences.”
First, they said most plant biologists focus on treatment groups instead of individuals. “The idea that individual plants may show consistent tendencies that can be quantified, independent of other treatments, leads to a different research focus. In addition, the existence of plant personalities means that knowledge of an individual's past provides information that can predict its behavior in the future. In Bayesian jargon, the existence of personalities means that informed priors can be used to improve predictive power.”
Tradeoffs. Second, they wrote, “recognition of correlations among different plant behaviors suggests that there may be tradeoffs among important traits that are not independent of one another. For example, a negative correlation between growth of roots and shoots suggests an allocation tradeoff between above and below ground tissues while a positive correlation between growth of roots and shoots suggests that differential access to resources is more important than such an allocation tradeoff. Life-history tradeoffs of this nature are familiar to evolutionary plant biologists and this framework can be applied to other plant behaviors.”
Third, they wrote, “alarm calls that affect herbivory influence plant growth, survival, and reproduction in the few systems where they have been studied. These demographic effects have the potential to shape plant adaptations, population sizes and distributions, ability to respond to natural and human induced changes, and interactions with other species, although potential effects of variation in plant communication have been largely neglected.”
The trio pointed out that “many of these volatile chemicals dissipate rapidly so that they are present in biologically active concentrations over relatively short distances (often less than 1 m). In many instances, cues may be emitted unintentionally, and this process is probably best described as eavesdropping by the receiving plant. These same plant volatile cues have been found to serve other functions in some instances such as repelling herbivores and attracting the predators and parasites of the herbivores.”
Landmark Book. Karban is the author of the landmark book, Plant Sensing and Communication (University of Chicago Press, 2015). He is a fellow of the Ecological Society of America (ESA) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the recipient of the 1990 George Mercer Award from ESA for outstanding research.
The UC Davis ecologist is featured in the Dec. 23-30, 2013 edition of The New Yorker in Michael Pollan's piece, The Intelligent Plant: Scientists Debate a New Way of Understanding Plants. Zoe Schlanger featured him in a Nov. 21, 2020 Bloomberg Quint article titled The Botanist Daring to Ask: Do Plants Have Personalities?
Karban, who holds a doctorate in biology from the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, joined the UC Davis faculty in 1982.
One of the activities at the Bohart Museum of Entomology open house, "Eight-Legged Encounters," set from 1 to 4 p.m., Saturday, June 25, will be a "Name-That-Spider-Species" contest, open to students 18 and under. The focus: a male trapdoor spider, a new species from the genus Promyrmekiaphila.
The event will be co-hosted by the Bohart Museum and the American Arachnological Society (AAS).
The open house will kick off the annual meeting of AAS, which meets June 26-30 on the UC Davis campus, said arachnologist Jason Bond, associate dean, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, and the Evert and Marion Schlinger Endowed Chair in Insect Systematics, UC Davis Department of Entomology and Nematology. Professor Bond is chairing the AAS conference with Lisa Chamberland, postdoctoral research associate of the Bond lab, and Joel Ledford, assistant professor of teaching, Department of Plant Biology, College of Biological Sciences.
Chamberland, who holds a doctorate from the University of Vermont where she studied the historical biogeography of net-casting spiders (Deinopis) and spiny-backed orb-weavers (Gasteracantha) in the Caribbean, is coordinating the spider-species naming project with doctoral student Emma Jochim of the Bond lab and incoming doctoral student Iris Bright, who starts this fall.
"The genus Promyrmekiaphila is a group of trapdoor spiders that construct silk-lined burrows with wafer-like trapdoor lids, usually decorated with plant material or substrate," Jochim explained. "It's found generally in the Southern Bay Area. As of now there are only two species in the genus, so this new species will be the third!"
The student who wins the contest will have the honor of naming the new species, and an acknowledgment will appear in a forthcoming scientific paper, said Bond.
At the open house, some 20 exhibits and activities--educational and entertaining--will be set up in the hallway of the Academic Surge Building. “There will be everything--spider specimens, live arachnids, activities, artwork, etc., at the open house," said Bond, adding that a powerhouse of the nation's arachnologists will participate.
AAS member Eileen Hebets, professor at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, is co-hosting the open house as part of a U.S. National Science Foundation grant, “Eight-Legged Encounters” that she developed as an outreach project to connect arachnologists with communities, especially youth. She seeks to educate the public “about the wonders of biology and the possibility of scientific discovery using a charismatic and engaging group of animals--arachnids. Arachnids (spiders and their relatives) are ubiquitous, thriving in most habitable environments on our planet (including underwater),” as mentioned on her website, https://hebetslab.unl.edu/
Professor Bond offers five good reasons to like spiders:
- Spiders consume 400-800 million tons of prey, mostly insects, each year. Humans consume somewhere around 400 million tons of meat and fish each year.
- Spider silk is one of the strongest naturally occurring materials. Spider silk is stronger than steel, stronger and more stretchy than Kevlar; a pencil thick strand of spider silk could be used to stop a Boeing 747 in flight.
- Some spiders are incredibly fast--able to run up to 70 body lengths per second (10X faster than Usain Bolt).
- Although nearly all 47,000-plus spider species have venom used to kill their insect prey, very few actually have venom that is harmful to humans.
- Some spiders are really good parents--wolf spider moms carry their young on their backs until they are ready to strike out on their own; female trapdoor spiders keep their broods safe inside their burrows often longer than one year, and some female jumping spiders even nurse their spiderlings with a protein rich substance comparable to milk.
Hebets says that as a scientist, a mother and an educator, she often sees "the disconnect between youth and the world around them; between problem solving skills, observation skills, critical thinking, natural curiosity and the more traditional formal teaching programs experienced by many students. Youth are innately curious and tremendously creative and my aim is to leverage these traits for their own educational advancements in a fun and engaging manner.” To date, Hebets and her collaborators have developed more than 25 modular activity stations “encompassing arts and crafts, experiments, games, and other hands-on activities." They include classification and taxonomy, spiders and silk, path of predators, and hands-on science.
The Bohart Museum, directed by UC Davis distinguished professor Lynn Kimsey, houses a worldwide collection of eight million insect specimens; a live "petting zoo" (Madagascar hissing cockroaches, stick insects and tarantulas) and an insect-themed gift shop.
In addition to the open house, AAS has scheduled a series of arachnid lectures, free and open to the public, from 7:30 to 9 p.m. Tuesday, June 28, in the newly constructed 600-seat lecture hall, California Hall.
The free, public open house. featuring spiders and other arachnids, promises to be one of the biggest events--if not the leggiest!--of the year on the UC Davis campus and beyond. The Bohart Museum is located in the Academic Surge Building, Crocker Lane.
A "powerhouse" of arachnologists will be participating, said Jason Bond, associate dean, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, and the Evert and Marion Schlinger Endowed Chair in Insect Systematics, UC Davis Department of Entomology and Nematology. He will be hosting the conference with Lisa Chamberland, postdoctoral research associate, Department of Entomology and Nematology, and Joel Ledford, assistant professor of teaching, Department of Plant Biology, College of Biological Sciences.
“There will be everything--spider specimens, live arachnids, activities, artwork, etc.," Professor Bond said.
Some 20 exhibits and activities will be set up in the hallway of the Academic Surge Building, said Tabatha Yang, the Bohart Museum's education and outreach coordinator.
Professor Eileen Hebets of the School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, is co-hosting the open house as part of a U.S. National Science Foundation grant, “Eight-Legged Encounters” that she developed as an outreach project to connect arachnologists with communities, especially youth. See https://www.youtube.com/
Through the NSF grant, awarded in 2013, Hebets seeks to educate the public “about the wonders of biology and the possibility of scientific discovery using a charismatic and engaging group of animals--arachnids. Arachnids (spiders and their relatives) are ubiquitous, thriving in most habitable environments on our planet (including underwater),” Professor Hebets writes on her website at https://hebetslab.unl.edu/
“As a scientist, a mother, and an educator, I often see the disconnect between youth and the world around them; between problem solving skills, observation skills, critical thinking, natural curiosity and the more traditional formal teaching programs experienced by many students,” she writes. “Youth are innately curious and tremendously creative and my aim is to leverage these traits for their own educational advancements in a fun and engaging manner.”
To date, Hebets and her collaborators have developed more than 25 modular activity stations “encompassing arts and crafts, experiments, games, and other hands-on activities." They include classification and taxonomy, spiders and silk, path of predators, and hands-on science.
Also at the open house, plans call for “A Name-That-Spider-Species" contest, coordinated by postdoctoral fellow Lisa Chamberland and PhD students Iris Bright and Emma Jochim of the Bond lab. “We'll have an exhibit at the event with details on the spider,” Bond said. It's a trapdoor spider from the genus Promyrmekiaphila. “We'd like to restrict naming suggestions to be youths attending the event, students 18 years and younger."
Another highlight of the American Arachnological