- Author: Luis Espino
A few weeks ago I was on the phone with a grower worried that he had put too much nitrogen on his rice for the cool year we were having. Then, the weather turned and got really hot. So, are we in a cool or warm year? What is the trend so far? It is hard to come with an answer just by comparing the daily average temperatures for this year to the historical average temperatures.
A way to discern what is going on is to look at the amount of heat units or degree days (DD) accumulate so far. Using the Colusa CIMIS station and a lower developmental threshold of 55oF, I calculated how many DD we have accumulated since May 1st.
Looks like 2013 is on the warmer side. The year 2011 was a characteristically mild year, while 2012 was closer to the historical average.
When looking at May and June individually, you realize that most of the extra DD were accumulated in June. May was closer to 2012 and to the historical average.
What are some of the implications of this? Early planted fields are already pass PI. Fields that have not reached PI yet should be evaluated for nitrogen topdress need. Warmer conditions promote growth and nitrogen use, and you don't want your crop to run out of fuel before the end of the race.
We've seen that during mild years blast can become a problem in some areas. Warmer temperatures seem to discourage explosions of the disease. If you are considering a treatment, scout your fields to identify infections and talk to your neighbors to see what is happening in the area.
- Author: Luis Espino
The 2013 Rice Production Workshop will be held on July 25 at the Lundberg Family Farms Multi-Purpose Room, 5311 Midway, Richvale, CA. The Workshop, organized by University of California Cooperative Extension (UCCE), will present current and potential growers, pest control advisers, industry representatives, regulatory agencies and other interested parties with a broad view of the California rice production system and the most up-to date research findings. Information will be presented by UC Davis and UCCE scientists and extension personnel with many years experience working in California rice.
Prepaid enrollment ($75) is required, and enrollment is limited to 75 people. Please enroll by July 21st to ensure your participation. Seats will be filled on a first-come basis. The registration fee covers a light breakfast, lunch and workshop educational materials.
Enroll on-line at http://ucanr.edu/2013riceworkshop.
/span>
2013 RPW Program Flyer
- Author: Tunyalee A. Martin
It’s that time of year again when hot weather fuels the creation of ozone, or smog. Some pesticides emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that contribute to ozone formation. Using pesticides that release VOCs may be restricted in certain California locations between May 1 and October 31.
If you plan to apply a pesticide, use the Department of Pesticide Regulation’s VOC calculators to determine emissions from fumigant and nonfumigant pesticides. Get there by clicking on the Air Quality button at the top of each treatment table in the UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Rice.
Simple steps can minimize the release of VOCs into the air:
- Use pesticides only when necessary.
- Decrease the amount of pesticide applied if appropriate.
- Choose low-emission management methods.
- Avoid emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulations and fumigants.
Ozone, or smog, is caused by mixing VOCs, nitrogen oxide, and sunshine. High levels of ozone can harm people and crops. Regions in California that do not meet federal or state air quality standards for ozone, called nonattainment areas, may restrict the use of pesticides that release VOCs.
- Author: Luis Espino
I was asked the other day what do immature tadpole shrimp (TPS) look like. Young TPS look pretty much like the older ones, just smaller. The very first instar, which remains inside the egg for a few hours, looks somewhat different, but you are not going to see this instar in the field with the naked eye. A few hours later they molt and look more like regular TPSs. Here's a picture of a few of them a few days later swimming belly up. Notice the rice grain floating next to them for size comparison.
- Author: Luis Espino
I just read an article from the latest edition of California Agriculture: “Nitrogen fertilizer use in California: Assessing the data, trends and a way forward”. The article compiles data about inorganic N fertilizer use by major crops in California and compares data from the 1970s to the 2000s. Rice is one of the crops included, accounting for 10% of the total N fertilizer used by the 33 crops considered. Two points jumped at me. First, the article found that “experts” believe growers apply more N fertilizer than growers report applying. The authors used the UC Davis Cost and Return Studies as the experts' opinion, and grower surveys conducted by the USDA for growers input on N fertilizer rates.
The second point is that the average N fertilizer rate for all 33 commodities in the study increased by 25% from 1973 to 2005. In the case of rice, for the same time period, the N fertilizer rate increased from 86 to 130 lbs N/acre (52% increase). The authors caution that these numbers shouldn't be taken in a vacuum, that yield increases should be considered. I calculated just that: if you consider the 5-year moving average rice yield, you find that the lbs of N fertilizer used per lb of rice produced hasn't changed from 1973 to 2005, it's 0.02 lbs N fertilizer/lb rice.