- Author: Albert Fischer
- Author: James Eckert
Summary
Winged primrose willow is an invasive weed that was identified in Butte County rice fields in 2011. Most infestations were along borders of fields and canals; however, this weed can thrive in the flooded environment within rice fields. Winged primrose willow can disperse through seeds and plant fragments floating in the irrigation water and tillage and harvest equipment.
Greenhouse tests showed that winged primrose willow can be controlled with rice herbicides. Early, into-the-water applications of Bolero Ultramax, Cerano or Granite GR effectively killed young plants. Foliar applications of Sandea and Londax were effective in controlling young plants (1.5 inches). Older plants (2.5 inches) were controlled by Grandstand or a tank mix of Grandstand and SuperWham.
After the initial discovery of winged primrose willow (Ludwigia decurrens) in Butte county, it was determined by Farm Advisors and the Agricultural Commissioner that the infestation expands over several square miles. Most infestations are along borders of fields and irrigation canals. One field had an infestation throughout. It is likely that this weed has gone undetected for up to five years or more. Seed capsules from this plant have thousands of seeds which are capable of floating on the water surface as a means of dispersal, especially along irrigation canals. Indeed, the Butte County Agricultural Commissioner believes this has been the main means of dispersal across the majority of the infested area. Other potential means of spread are by tillage equipment and combines. Additionally, it has been determined that plant fragments have the ability to grow roots within a day or two when in water. This suggests that mowing of levees as a means of control may potentially increase dispersal of this weed.
Testing in the greenhouse at the Rice Experiment Station indicates that the plant germinates best when the soil is moist but not flooded. However, the seed can germinate under water and eventually grow above the water surface with the potential to survive in a rice field and set seed. This plant also has the ability to form roots that grow upwards through the water column in order to scavenge oxygen near the water surface. Glyphosate will control this plant on levees, but any formed seed capsules will have viable seeds that will likely germinate the next season if not removed from the field and buried in a landfill as requested by the Agricultural Commissioner. It is suggested that any levee spraying of known infestations happen early in the season prior to the yellow flowers being visible.
Testing of currently available rice herbicides indicates several potential options for control of this invasive weed within rice fields. We tested early season water active herbicides (Table 1). This was done at early water flood and on larger, more established weeds. The early flood treatment entailed moistened soil for 3 days prior to the flood being established. This was intended to simulate the flooding of large fields where the soil is moist as water is built up for flood. Winged primrose willow will germinate under this conditions prior to flood. Herbicide treatments were applied after the flood was established. The later timing entailed plants that were allowed to establish and grow to approximately 2.5 inches in moist soil, then the flood was established and herbicide treatments applied. This treatment method was intended to be similar to a drill seeded situation where into water herbicides could be applied after establishment of permanent flood.
Table 1. Water active herbicides tested against winged primrose willow at Biggs, CA.
In continuous flood, Cerano caused bleaching and eventual death of the small plants. The later application of Cerano slowly bleached the plants and it is believed that they will not be able to produce viable seed. Bolero Ultramax activity was fairly slow, but eventually killed both young and older plants when flood was maintained. Granite GR slowly bleached the young plants and it is expected to fully control the weed at that stage; however, more established plants survived the treatment and would likely set seed. Shark H2O initially appeared to be very efficacious on both plant sizes; however, plants were able to survive the treatment by putting on new leaves. These plants eventually flowered and would be expected to produce viable seeds. Sandea applied to the flood water did not control the weed although it caused some malformations of the typical plant. It is likely the plants surviving the Sandea treatment would set seed.
We also tested later season foliar herbicides (Table 2) on both early establishment and larger more established plants. Early establishment in this case consisted of plants allowed to establish to approximately 1.5 inches tall at time of application. The larger, more established plants were approximately 2.5 inches tall.
Table 2. Foliar active herbicides tested against winged primrose willow, Biggs, CA.
Regiment did not control either young or old plants. Granite SC also did not fully control either age of plants. Sandea and Londax, however, appear to control the weed sufficiently when it is young but less effectively when it is more established. Shark H2O initially appeared to be the best treatment with rapid severe burn of leaves, but the plants recovered by producing new leaves. These plants eventually produced flowers and would be expected to have viable seed. SuperWham provided some control when the plants were small, however the more established plants were not significantly hindered. Grandstand caused severe damage to both young and established plants. The tank mix of SuperWham and Grandstand was the most efficacious of all the foliar treatments.
Conclusions
The best control strategy for winged primrose willow in rice culture would be to use early water active herbicides like Bolero Ultramax, Cerano or Granite GR when the weed is very small and more vulnerable to treatment. If follow-up foliar herbicides are needed, early appications of Sandea or Londax may be sufficient when the weed is still very small. Later foliar applications for control of winged primrose willow would require Grandstand or a tank mix of Grandstand plus SuperWham. Some of the treatments that did not kill winged primrose willow may have been sufficient to prevent establishment in rice and setting of viable seed.
- Author: Luis Espino
The season is advancing and fields are starting to go into tillering. I have always been amazed at the capacity of rice plants to adapt to the conditions of the field, producing more tillers in thin stands and less tillers in dense stands. Tillering is one of the important stages that can be most influenced by management practices. Below is a brief review of how the tillering process occurs and its implications for rice management.
Tillering marks the end of the seedling stage. It starts when the fourth true leaf is fully emerged. At this stage, the nodes are all “compressed” close to the ground—the length between nodes (internode length) is less than 0.04 inches. In theory, each node has the capacity to produce a leaf, a tiller and a root; however, tillers and their roots emerge later than leafs. A tiller and its root start growing when the leaf from the third node above is emerging. This means that when the 4th leaf starts emerging (from the 4th node), the 1st node's tiller and root start growing. When the 5th leaf emerges, the 2nd node's tiller and root start growing, and so on.
Tillers emerging in this way from nodes in the main culm are called primary tillers. These emerge all through the vegetative growth phase, but stop when plants reach panicle initiation (the starting point of the reproductive phase). These tillers emerge and branch out from the base of the plant. After panicle initiation, tillers may continue to emerge from preexisting tillers, filling out the space among plants. These tillers are called secondary tillers.
The tillering capacity of rice plants varies with variety, plant spacing, fertility, weed competition and damage from pests. Some varieties are intrinsically better at tillering than others, and these differences can make a variety more “plastic”, adapting better to thin or dense stands. Late maturing varieties have longer periods of tillering than early maturing varieties.
Each tiller has the potential to produce a panicle; however, not all do. Some tillers die before flowering because of shading by other tillers or weeds; the surviving tillers will produce a panicle.
Plants in dense stands produce fewer tillers than plants in thin stands (Fig. 1). In dense stands, the duration of the tillering phase, and in turn, the maturity period for panicles, is reduced. This might be beneficial because it reduces the variability in maturity among panicles. However, if stands are too dense, one runs the risk of disease and lodging. Under low plant densities, more tillers are produced. This can result in a longer period of panicle maturity and a higher number of ineffective tillers (tillers that don't produce a panicle).
Fig. 1. Relationship between plant stand, number of tillers per plant and yield. Butte County, 1984-1985.
Yields under thin or dense stands may not vary much. Because of their tillering capacity, plants can compensate for a thin stand by producing more tillers, and still reach high yields, as shown in Fig. 1. Research in California has shown that to avoid the problems related with thin and dense stands, take full advantage of the tillering capacity of rice plants, and produce good yields, plant densities must be between 15 to 20 seedlings per square foot.
- Author: Luis Espino
We received several reports of tadpole shrimp (TPS) problems this year. One field I visited had to be replanted due to TPS damage. Flooding of this field took a long time, resulting in checks that were flooded for more than 10 days before the field was seeded. This might have allowed enough time for the shrimp to develop and reach high numbers by the time seeds were starting to germinate. The grower drained to field and this killed the TPS, but after reflood, we saw a second TPS hatch. A pesticide had to be used to protect the replant.
My theory is that the dry winter is to blame for the spike in TPS activity this year. Fields were really dry and flooding took longer than usual. Additionally, because everyone was trying to flood at the same time, in many areas there wasn't enough water for a fast flood. As in the field described above, some checks were flooded for several days before seeding, giving the TPS an advantage.
I'm conducting an experiment with an experimental compound for TPS control. So far, it looks promising, but we'll have to wait some time before we can draw any final conclusions.
- Author: Randall Mutters
Once again we may be facing a difficult planting season. Stand establishment, weed control, and nitrogen management are particularly problematic in wet springs. Below are a few points that you might want to keep in mind. As always, if I can be of assistance don't hesitate to give me call.
Seed Bed Preparation
Well prepared, dry soil improves seedling vigor and stand establishment. Unless there are other overriding constraints, take the time to let the soil dry rather than rush planting into a wet seedbed.
Weeds
In wet years, another important objective of groundwork is to dry the soil to kill germinated weeds. Working wet soil may just transplant them although it may be unavoidable if spring rains persist this year. Consider taking the extra time to work the soil to allow it to dry, at least in the top 1-2” where most of the weeds arise.
Herbicide program tradeoffs are likely because it is hard to achieve optimum weed control when weeds germinate before planting and get a head start on the rice. For example, timing of water applied materials is more critical. To avoid crop injury with Bolero®, it should be applied at the two leaf stage of the rice, but watergrass should have less than two leaves. This narrow timing of applicaiton window may be lost because the weeds are ahead of the rice. The same idea is also true with Cerano® , which can be applied at day of seeding. Consider reserving it for those fields which have had an opportunity to dry out thoroughly; Cerano® in a wet field with germinated weed seeds may result in poor grass control. All these early applied materials still have a role, but may not work as well unless the seed bed gets dried out first.
A backup program involving foliar materials, such as Abolish®, propanil, Clincher® or Regiment® in sequences or combinations are options. Timing and possibly rate will be affected if weeds germinate prior to planting. Foliar applications provide a greater degree of flexibility.
Fertilizer
Switching to dry fertilizer and using lower N rates are useful strategies. What are the differences between dry N fertilizer and aqua? Both urea and ammonium sulfate are viable alternatives but differ in their form and concentration. Urea is about 46% N and is a neutral salt, so it will move with the water until it converts to the ammonium form (about two days), after which it adsorbs on soil colloids. Urea is subject to volatile loss when applied to bare, moist soil so it should be incorporated promptly after application. In contrast, ammonium sulfate is 21% N, does not require conversion, adsorbs on soil colloids as soon as it dissolves and is much less subject to volatilization. The higher concentration of urea can lead to streaked applications, but may be cheaper to apply because less material is used. Plant response should not differ between these two materials, but experience suggests that broadcast N is generally less efficient than N which is incorporated into the soil.
As we move through the month of May and into June, N rates should come down to accommodate a shorter growing season and to offset the gain in soil N from more complete mineralization of organic N. In very late fields consider using only starter at planting and top dress later, based on crop need and leaf analysis.
In extreme circumstances some rice may get planted without any preplant N. In such a case consider 20% to 30% of the total N rate be applied within the first 20 days after planting (probably as ammonium phosphate or blend), and the balance split equally between early tillering (about 6 leaf stage) and the mid-tillering (8 leaf stage) to panicle initiation (10 leaf stage). An important point is not to apply too much P early on plants that are under water. This is a recipe for algae. Wait for emergence or drop the water to make sure the plants are emerged.
Shrimp/Midge/Algae
With wet seedbeds and warm temperatures, shrimp eggs may be primed and ready to go, so be on the alert. Although midges are very difficult to predict, they seem to be associated with slow flooding and warm temperatures. With the potential for water competition because everyone will flood at the same time, this combination could occur, especially if it suddenly gets warm. With late planting and wet soils, the chances are good we will see some hot weather on young stands that are not yet emerged. This is ripe for algae to bloom. If you cannot incorporate fertilizer P prior to flooding consider waiting until 20 to 25 days after planting and apply it into the water to avoid algae problems.
Tillage and Seedbed Preparation
Is crusting a problem? This is uncertain and probably varies with the soil, but some field observations suggest that crusts can affect stand establishment. It may be a good idea to do a light tillage to break the crust. A crust will soften under water allowing roots to penetrate. But, if it is smooth and slick, seeds may move and won't have a chance to root. Land planes don't work very well in moist soil so you may have to use some sort of float or skip this step completely if the ground is reasonably smooth. Rollers may have less appeal this year if you can't get the seedbed dry. The objectives of seedbed preparation remain the same, with emphasis on drying to kill weeds and to prepare a surface that will provide a seedbed appropriate for maximum stand establishment.
Winged Primrose Willow (WPW)
WPW was discovered south of Richvale at the end of the 2011 season. This is the first confirmed occurrence west of Texas. WPW is a native of South America and is an invasive species with the potential to become well established in seasonal wet lands. It is a annual plant which may exhibit perennial behavior in mild climes. One plant can produce vast quantities of seeds that are easily transported in water and on equipment. Its biology and appropriate eradication strategies are still under investigation. However, the seeds may germinate while floating on the water. It's likely that WPW can vegetatively propagate; i.e. plant fragments, such as stem and root pieces, form roots then develop into new plants. It appears that foliar-active broadleaf herbicides provide a degree of control. A cooperative effort to eradicate WPW involving growers, PCAs, the Agricultural Commissioner, the Rice Experiment Station, and the University of California is underway.
If you farm a field where WPW was found in 2011 the following actions are recommended where possible:
- Move the contaminated field(s) to end of your planting schedule to avoid transporting seeds to a ‘clean' field, i.e. cultivate the ‘dirty' field last;
- Alternatively, thoroughly wash down and clean your equipment on-site before leaving the contaminated field;
- Routinely scout your fields, especially ditch banks, areas with cattails, and field edges to identify and control WPW before it flowers. WPW develops its characteristic square stem around the 4th leave stage;
- If you suspect WPW in your fields or need more information call your local UC farm advisor or agricultural commissioner's office. Thank you.
For pictures of winged primrose willow, go to the UC IPM website (www.ipm.ucdavis.edu) and navigate to the Rice Pest Management Guidelines. On the top of the page you will find the link for winged primrose willow under “New Pest in California”.
Winged primrose willow. Photo by L. Espino.
- Author: Luis Espino
In past newsletters and extension meetings the topics of N and P fertility have been covered recurrently. This year, Bruce Linquist, UC Davis Research Scientist, will begin a project to evaluate the status of K in rice soils in several locations across the Valley. His results will help explain occurrences of K deficiency. In the meantime, here is some basic information about K in rice systems.
Potassium in soil and plants
In the soil, K originates from slowly weathering minerals. In the soil solution, K is present as K ion (K+), the form used by plants. In rice plants, K participates in many enzymatic and physiological processes; notably in the opening and closing of stomata (leaf openings responsible for gas exchange). In general, K increases tillering, grain size and weigh, and disease resistance. In rice plants about 75% of plant K remains in leaves and stems, and the rest is translocated to grains.
Diagnosing potassium deficiency
In general, plant symptoms of K deficiency are observed after panicle initiation (PI) or as late as heading. From afar, the field has a reddish, burned appearance. When inspected closely, older leaf tips look chlorotic and burned, leaf blades show small brown spots that coalesce to form irregular necrotic areas. Potassium is very mobile within the plant; therefore, deficiency symptoms are observed fist in older leaves (when deficient, K is transported from older leaves to growing points where it is needed).
Soil and plant samples can be used to confirm K deficiency (Table 1). When using soil samples, make sure the ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) method is used since this method has been calibrated for California soils. When using plant tissue, sample the Y leave (the most recent fully expanded leaf).
If K fertilizer is needed, pre-plant applications are the most effective. Topdressing at mid-tillering is also possible; however, applications at this time are not as effective as pre-plant applications. Late K applications (after PI) may not affect yield but can reduce symptoms and help increase overall plant vigor.
Pre-plant K can be surfaced applied—K does not volatilize, like N, and it does not increase algae problems, like P. However, if a blend including N and P is used, the material should be incorporated to avoid the previously mentioned problems. The K rate needed will vary depending on soil characteristics and the intensity of deficiency. Growers should experiment using different rates to see which gives the best results.
Potassium deficiency in rice field. Photo by J. Williams.
Plants showing K deficiency symptoms. Photo by J. Williams.
Straw management and potassium
An 8,000 lbs rice crop extracts 174 lbs of K per acre, 26 lbs on the grain and 148 lbs on the straw. When incorporating or burning the straw, all of the straw K returns to the soil. However, when burning, the distribution of the K might not be uniform because of movement of the remaining ash due to wind and rains.
If baling during the fall, approximately 34 lbs of K are removed per ton of baled straw. When baling occurs during the spring, much less K is removed because a large proportion of the K in the straw leaches from the plants with winter rains. Baling has the potential of mining K out of the soil relatively quickly. Experiments in California have shown that after three seasons of baling, the amount of extractable K in the top soil can be reduced below critical levels.
While baling increases the probability of seeing K deficiency in a relatively short period of time, many years of rice production and grain-K extraction without resupplying the soil can lead to K deficiency in a longer time frame. This might explain why growers experience K deficiency problems in soils that were considered high in K in the past.
Table 1. Critical levels of K in the soil and plant tissues.
Phase/Growth stage |
Critical value for deficiency |
Notes |
K in soil |
Ammonium acetate extraction method |
|
K in plant—mid tillering |
<1.4% |
Y leave content |
K in plant—PI |
<1.0% |
|
K in plant—flag leaf |
<1.0% |