- Author: Michelle Leinfelder-Miles
- Author: Daniel Geisseler
We are now in the second year of a project investigating how to estimate nitrogen (N) mineralization in mineral and organic soils. Nitrogen mineralization is the conversion of organic forms of N, which are not plant-available, to inorganic forms of N which are plant-available, like ammonium and nitrate. Mineralization occurs as a result of microbial decomposition of nutrients. Understanding N mineralization is important because it can help us apply N fertilizers more efficiently, by accounting for soil-available nutrients. Due to high groundwater nitrate concentrations, California growers are facing increasing pressure to improve N use efficiency in an effort to reduce nitrate leaching. To maintain competitive yields, however, growers need accurate estimates of soil-available N so that they can adjust fertilizer application rates with confidence.
In Spring 2016, the project team collected soil samples from 30 fields from Tulelake to Fresno County, including five sites in the Delta (having organic soils) and four other sites in San Joaquin County (having mineral soils). All of the fields were in annual crop rotations and had no recent legume cover crops or manure applications. The Delta soils had organic matter that ranged from about 6 to 23 percent; whereas, the soils from other areas of San Joaquin County had about 1.5 to 2 percent soil organic matter (SOM). The bulk density (i.e. the mass divided by volume) of the Delta soils averaged 0.9 g/cm3 compared to the mineral soils, which averaged 1.2 g/cm3. The reason it is important to measure the bulk density is because when soil nutrients are measured, they need to be converted from concentration to lbs/acre per foot of soil depth using a conversion factor. That factor will change depending on the bulk density.
In general, N mineralization was higher in the organic soils than the mineral soils, but it also varied more across the organic soils (Figure 1). When N mineralization is expressed as a percent of total soil N, however, mineral soils were more variable. This is likely due to the fact that the SOM is more stable in Delta soils than in mineral soils, where SOM is largely derived from recent crop residues. In other words, crop residues influence N mineralization more in mineral soils than in organic soils.
Figure 1. Net N mineralization rates of the 30 soils included in the study in 2016.
Preliminary results also show that soil temperature and other soil properties have a strong effect on N mineralization. The soil temperature effect has been modeled to show that as temperature increases, N mineralization increases exponentially. The soil properties which most influenced N mineralization included total soil N, total soil carbon (C), particulate organic C (a measure of the availability of organic matter to microbial decomposition), and pH. These soil variables are more predictive of N mineralization in organic soils than in mineral soils; more work is needed to determine which soil variables best help to predict N mineralization in mineral soils. Soil moisture likely also plays a role in N mineralization, and it will be studied in the future.
We are continuing the study again in 2017 and hope that the results will contribute to a better understanding of N mineralization in both organic and mineral soils, with the ultimate goal of developing an online decision-support tool for growers to help in estimating field-specific N mineralization rates.
- Author: Michelle Leinfelder-Miles
UC Cooperative Extension has augmented efforts to monitor armyworm populations in rice fields since 2015 when we observed large populations earlier in the year (June) than previously observed. Here in San Joaquin County, we began monitoring in Delta rice fields a couple weeks ago. We are cooperating with rice farm advisors in the Sacramento Valley to get a more comprehensive assessment of the populations. Figure 1 shows moth counts from last week. The Delta count is the single orange data point at about 36 moths/day. Compare that to the Sacramento Valley where there have been similarly high moth catches in Colusa and Glenn counties.
These counts illustrate that it is important to be monitoring fields for worm feeding. The UC IPM guidelines for monitoring and treatment are excerpted below. In general, at the foliar stage, if half of the sampled plants have at least 25 percent defoliation from feeding, and worms are visible, then treatment is probably warranted. At the panicle stage, if 10 percent of the panicles are damaged and worms are present, then treatment may be warranted.
Armyworm larvae will grow to full size and pupate in about 3 to 4 weeks. That said, it is important to monitor fields now and later in the summer in case the current generation reproduces and a new generation develops when panicles are present.
In 2016, UC Cooperative Extension worked with the California Rice Commission to get an emergency approval for the use of Intrepid 2F (methoxyfenozide) in affected rice counties, including San Joaquin County. The 2017 application has not yet been approved, so we do not currently have this product available for rice. Please see the UC IPM guidelines for a list of registered products. I will provide an update on future moth trapping counts and product approvals as the information becomes available.
From UC IPM: Rice Armyworm Monitoring and Treatment
Foliar Injury: Monitor for foliar injury from panicle differentiation to heading by looking for signs of armyworms feeding on leaves. Once you begin to observe injury, start taking samples twice a week until grain start maturing or larvae are no longer present. To sample, choose a part of the field where you have observed injury. Select a plant at random and pull it up or move all the surrounding foliage away and check for defoliation. Check the plant from the top of the leaves to the base of the plant and the water surface for armyworms. Determine if 25% or more of the foliage has been removed by armyworms; also note if you find armyworms on neighboring weeds or rice plants. Record your observations on a monitoring form. Repeat this procedure every 5 to 10 feet (1.5–3 m) across a transect until 10 plants have been examined. Move to a different part of the field where feeding is evident and examine 10 more plants in the same manner. Repeat this procedure at several areas of the field until you are confident that you have an estimate of the average field condition.
Panicle Loss: Monitor for panicle loss after panicle emergence by checking for entire panicles or parts of panicles that have turned white; these indicate armyworm feeding. Be sure to differentiate this injury from stem rot, which may kill the entire panicle and darken the stems. Once you begin to observe armyworm injury to the panicle, take samples twice a week to determine the need for treatment. Use a sampling ring made of plastic tubing that encloses 1 square foot. Select your sampling sites in parts of the field with white panicles. Drop the ring at your side without looking. Examine all the plants within the ring down to the water level for armyworms; at the same time check for stem rot. Record the number of panicles and the percentage of them that are white and the presence or absence of armyworms within the ring. Move on 5 to 10 feet and repeat the procedure until 10 samples have been taken. Move to another area of the field with signs of panicle injury and take 10 more samples. Repeat the 10-sample procedure until you feel that you have a good estimate of the field condition.
Treatment Decisions: From panicle differentiation through heading, treat for foliar damage only in those areas of the field where 5 or more of the 10 samples taken have over 25% defoliation and armyworms are present on the plants. If you observe a few or no armyworms, come back at night to check for the larvae, which are more active after dark. Do not treat if armyworms are not present, especially during late August, because they have probably completed development.
From panicle emergence to grain maturity, treat for panicle loss if 10% of the panicles in the area sampled are damaged and armyworms are observed. If armyworms are not observed but panicle loss is 10% or more, check for the larvae at night. If larvae are not found, do not treat because they have probably pupated and will do no further damage. Limit treatments to those areas of the field with economic damage.
- Author: Michelle Leinfelder-Miles
1. Register for the Weedy Rice Workshop
UC Cooperative Extension and the California Rice Commission are sponsoring this workshop to update growers and consultants on the current weedy rice situation in California and on research that is being conducted by the University of California. Additionally, guest speaker, Dr. Nilda Burgos from the University of Arkansas, will be presenting on weedy rice management, lessons from the southeastern U.S. Two workshops will be held:
- August 9th, 9:00am – 12:00pm, New Earth Market Harvest Room, 1475 Tharp Road, Yuba City
- August 10th, 9:00am – 12:00pm, Colusa Casino, 3770 Hwy. 45, Colusa
There is no cost to attend, but on-line registration is required. Enrollment per workshop is limited to 50 people, so please enroll early. Lunch is included. Applications for DPR and CCA CE hours have been submitted.
Information on weedy rice in California is also available from this website, which was developed by UC Cooperative Extension and the California Rice Commission.
2. Armyworm Update
We continue to monitor armyworms in Delta rice fields. Moth trap counts were high at the end of June, but the count did drop during the first week of July. We encourage growers and consultants to continuing monitoring this pest, particularly in late-planted rice. Keep an eye out for a another generation of worms that may become evident when panicles have emerged. UC IPM has the following guidelines for monitoring and treatment. The E.P.A. has granted an emergency approval of Intrepid 2F (methoxyfenozide) in rice growing counties. Please contact the County Agricultural Commissioner's office for more information.
- Author: Michelle Leinfelder-Miles
The 2017 UCCE grain corn variety trial was planted on May 9th, almost two weeks later than the trial was planted in 2016, due to the wet winter and spring. The trial is located in the Sacramento County Delta. Three replicate blocks of fifteen varieties were planted by air planter. This year, the varieties represent both conventional and RR varieties, as indicated in Table 1. Stand counts were made approximately two weeks after planting, and bloom was assessed over the week of July 10th. While bloom occurred later this year due to the later planting, the number of days to bloom was less than in 2016. Across all varieties, the average number of days to bloom was 65, compared to 70 in 2016. Over the remainder of the season, we will also evaluate disease pressure (fusarium ear rot, head smut, and common smut), lodging, ear height, grain moisture, and yield. Results from previous years are available from my website.
Table 1. Corn varieties planted in the 2017 UCCE grain corn variety trial.
- Author: Michelle Leinfelder-Miles