- Author: Mark Bolda
- Author: Steven Koike
Introduction: A major purpose of this blog is to educate and inform on new emerging issues and developments in strawberries and caneberries. In addition, we also want to review and update common, well known issues that readers may be very familiar with. The following article is a review of a very important disease affecting the strawberry and caneberry industries: gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea.
Causal Organism: Botrytis cinerea belongs to the fungal phylum Deuteromycota (sometimes also known as fungi imperfecti) and reproduces by forming asexual spores (conidia). The sexually reproducing stage has not been seen on strawberry or caneberry. The young mycelium of this fungus is septate, branched, and basically colorless. When this fungus is grown on potato dextrose agar, a common medium used to culture fungi, Botrytis cinerea is at first white and later turns gray as spores form. The spore producing structures are branched, up to 5 mm tall, and light to dark gray in color. Even under the low magnification of a dissecting microscope, one can readily see the distinctive “botryose” (Greek for bunch of grapes) clusters of spores at the ends of the spore-bearing branches (see sixth picture below).
Symptoms on Fruit: The rot from Botrytis is fairly simple to distinguish from the other fruit rots occurring in strawberries and caneberries. Generally, Botrytis rot will start as a light brown to gray spot (see third photo below) without any distinct margin around the affected area. This spot remains firm as it spreads and even a fruit completely rotten with Botrytis will retain its original shape. After a few days, if conditions are favorable (temperatures between 59o- 77oF), a brown to gray velvety growth will appear on the surface of the infected fruit.
Disease Cycle: Botrytis fruit infections on the Central Coast generally begin when the spore lands on the strawberry or caneberry flower. Given cooler temperatures and the presence of water, the spore germinates and infects the flower. If conditions are really favorable, the disease will progress in flower tissues and result in blighted blossoms that will no longer develop into fruit. Partial flower infections can cause brown lesions to form on the fruit receptacle; such flowers will not produce normal, fully developed fruit. In other cases the flower-invading Botrytis can become dormant and will not resume growing until fruit sugar content is more amenable for growth, at which point the disease will become evident from the brown lesion and subsequent gray velvety growth that occurs on the ripening fruit. If conditions become unfavorable for further disease development, Botrytis growth will stop and the lesion will become dry and leathery.
Because Botrytis is an aggressive colonizer of plant wounds, direct infection of the fruit can also occur if the fruit is injured from physical abrasion (rubbing caused by winds, for example), insect feeding, environmental extremes, other diseases, and other factors. Mature, ripe fruit are especially susceptible to infection because of their high sugar content and sensitive tissues. For this reason, Botrytis is an important component of post-harvest fruit losses.
Epidemiology: Botrytis spores (primary inoculum) are everywhere. The fungus grows well on senescent, dead tissues (old, dead strawberry stems and leaves; crop residues of other adjacent crops). Spores are blown by winds or splashed by rains onto flower and fruit tissues. It is important to note that the presence of free moisture for several consecutive hours is necessary for spore germination. Therefore, development of gray mold disease is greatest in cool and wet conditions, such as rain and the fog commonly experienced here on the Central Coast.
Control: Growers and managers should take a threefold approach to managing Botrytis gray mold in the field.
Fungicides: There is a substantial universe of fungicides available for the management of gray mold in strawberries and caneberries and a decent listing of these materials is available at the UC IPM website (http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/crops-agriculture.html). The key point for disease managers is to apply fungicides BEFORE major moisture events. As emphasized above, Botrytis spores need free moisture to germinate; therefore fungicides, which mostly act as protectants,should be in place before the occurrence of humidity and free moisture from rain or heavy fog . It is worth noting that the use of surfactants, which serve to better distribute fungicides over the plant surface as well as stabilize them, is strongly recommended with fungicide applications.
Sanitation: Removal of infected fruit from around the plant during the harvest season is helpful in reducing Botrytis gray mold potential, since each infected fruit produces millions of spores that can move onto nearby flowers and fruit. It is not necessary to remove fruit completely from the field; deposition of diseased fruit into the furrow and its periodic destruction by foot or machine traffic is sufficient. Additionally, removal of dead leaves on occasion can be of benefit because it removes another potential source of inoculum while at the same time maintaining more air circulation around the plant and keeping it drier.
Moisture management: Knowing that free moisture is critical to development of Botrytis grey mold gives managers a key tool in limiting development of this disease. For strawberries, planting so as to account for expected plant size and allowing for more air circulation is one step. It is worth noting that transplants can be chilled with an eye to managing plant size; short day varieties such as Chandler and Camarosa should not be chilled more than three days for most situations, and day neutral varieties such as Albion, San Andreas or Monterey generally should not be chilled more than 18 days. The use of drip irrigation, a universal practice in California, is essential for preventing irrigation water from contributing to favorable conditions for gray mold disease.
The use of macro-tunnels (also called high tunnels or Spanish tunnels) in caneberries results in a tremendous reduction of free moisture from rain or dew and a very real drop in the amount of gray mold disease to the extent that fungicide applications for Botrytis might be dispensed with entirely. There is no bigger step a caneberry grower can take to reduce Botrytis gray mold in their crop than to construct a macro-tunnel over it.
Before using any fungicide products, check with your local Agricultural Commissioner's Office and consult product labels for current status of product registration, restrictions, and use information.
- Author: Mark Bolda
Since June of this year there has been a spate of yellowing and senescing (dying) of leaves of certain raspberries. This problem is widespread in the Watsonville and Salinas production district and first appears as a yellowing of the older leaves toward the bottom of the plant. The symptoms appear evenly distributed through the field with very little patchiness in incidence. The yellowing tends to follow a mottled pattern (Photo 2 below) and surprisingly can be pretty bounded on the leaf, for example on one half and not the other. Affected leaves end up separating from the main plant quite easily. The yellowing and dieback most often occurs on the lower half of the plant, and rarely advances higher nor does it result in total plant death. From growers and personal observations this yellowing and senescing usually does not appear to result in any reduction in plant vigor or yield, but there are occasions of total plant loss. There are reports of occasional loss of fruit integrity and crumbliness in affected fields, but this is strictly anecdotal.
The lengthy report below is a summary of the multifold approach we took to studying this issue followed by a discussion at the end regarding what is the most likely cause.
Arthropods: Arthropods are not the cause of this problem. One grower reported a correlation with a certain type of mite and while there were patches of twospotted spider mites in some locations, in others there were none nor had there ever been. Beyond the mites, no other arthropods capable of causing leaf discoloration or necrosis were found.
Diseases: The leaf yellowing is not caused by a pathogen. A total of five whole plant samples (plant tops and roots) from several fields experiencing leaf yellowing were submitted to the UCCE diagnostic laboratory in Salinas, and in only one case did the test come up positive for a species of Phytophthora. As leaf yellowing can be caused by virus infection, for example Raspberry Bushy Dwarf Virus on the Autumn series of red raspberry, a set of leaf samples was tested at the UCCE diagnostic lab in Salinas and another distinct set totaling five samples was submitted to the CDFA disease diagnostic laboratory in Sacramento. All tests for virus came back completely negative.
Nutritional: Levels of nitrogen and phosphorous are below sufficiency and substantially lower in yellow leaves than in green leaves, and levels of calcium are above sufficiency (and well above sufficiency in a field of healthy green plants) and higher in yellow leaves than in green leaves. Soil concentrations of nitrates are below recommended levels of at least 10 ppm in three of four fields experiencing yellow leaves. Concentrations of the salts sodium and chloride are substantially lower in all fields experiencing leaf yellowing than a field of symptomless, apparently healthy plants.
Table 1. Leaf Samples. ‘Healthy Green’ refers to leaf samples taken from a field experiencing no yellowing anywhere; other Green and Yellow are paired sets coming from the same field and leaves collected from floricane at the same approximate height of about 18" above the soil. Samples consisted of at least 15 leaves coming from various parts of the field taken between July 16 and July 27.
|
Sample Description |
||||||||
Nutrient |
Healthy Green |
Green 1 |
Yellow 1 |
Green A |
Yellow A |
Green B |
Yellow B |
Green 2 |
Yellow 2 |
% N |
3.3 |
1.7 |
2.1 |
3.0 |
1.3 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
2.7 |
1.7 |
% P |
0.22 |
0.15 |
0.17 |
0.27 |
0.19 |
0.30 |
0.21 |
0.23 |
0.15 |
% K |
1.1 |
1.0 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
2.6 |
1.9 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
% Ca |
2.5 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
% Mg |
0.83 |
0.67 |
0.56 |
0.58 |
0.63 |
0.74 |
0.79 |
0.58 |
0.67 |
% S |
0.18 |
0.20 |
0.23 |
0.17 |
0.10 |
0.18 |
0.093 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
ppm Cu |
4.1 |
7.2 |
8.4 |
6.5 |
5.4 |
7.1 |
5.7 |
8.3 |
7.2 |
ppm Zn |
19 |
12 |
26 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
19 |
14 |
12 |
ppm Fe |
330 |
320 |
400 |
780 |
970 |
940 |
900 |
200 |
320 |
ppm Mn |
560 |
180 |
150 |
1600 |
1400 |
2000 |
1400 |
140 |
180 |
ppm B |
78 |
67 |
73 |
110 |
170 |
140 |
180 |
72 |
67 |
ppm Na |
160 |
270 |
210 |
110 |
290 |
140 |
220 |
270 |
270 |
ppm Cl |
390 |
2500 |
320 |
4100 |
3900 |
4900 |
6000 |
2900 |
2500 |
ppm NO3- N |
2500 |
300 |
340 |
610 |
400 |
180 |
460 |
790 |
300 |
|
Sample Description |
|||||
Nutrient |
Green 3 |
Yellow 3 |
Green 4 |
Yellow 4 |
Average Green* |
Average Yellow |
% N |
2.6 |
2.0 |
2.8 |
1.9 |
2.6 |
1.7 |
% P |
0.20 |
0.12 |
0.24 |
0.13 |
0.23 |
0.16 |
% K |
1.2 |
0.74 |
1.80 |
0.95 |
1.53 |
1.4 |
% Ca |
1.2 |
1.6 |
0.9 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
2.2 |
% Mg |
0.44 |
0.52 |
0.38 |
0.67 |
0.57 |
0.64 |
% S |
0.19 |
0.18 |
0.17 |
0.18 |
0.18 |
0.17 |
ppm Cu |
6.5 |
6.6 |
6.3 |
8.3 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
ppm Zn |
13 |
10 |
15. |
18 |
16 |
18 |
ppm Fe |
240 |
290 |
277 |
1020 |
460 |
650 |
ppm Mn |
270 |
340 |
250 |
579 |
740 |
675 |
ppm B |
71 |
85 |
56 |
128 |
86 |
117 |
ppm Na |
120 |
170 |
200 |
600 |
185 |
293 |
ppm Cl |
3600 |
5100 |
4000 |
7000 |
3667 |
4136 |
ppm NO3- N |
350 |
93 |
- |
- |
446 |
318 |
*Healthy sample excluded from these calculations.
Table 2. Soil Samples. Soil samples are a total of 10 6” deep cores taken from areas experiencing yellow leaves. The surface crust of the soil was brushed away before sampling. All soil samples were taken July 27.
|
Sample Description* |
||||
Data |
Healthy Green |
Yellow 1 |
Yellow A |
Yellow 2 |
Yellow 3 |
NO3-N (ppm) |
33 |
4.2 |
16 |
4.7 |
<2 |
P (ppm) |
120 |
98 |
130 |
100 |
130 |
K (ppm) |
240 |
580 |
340 |
210 |
260 |
Ca (ppm) |
3300 |
3000 |
2700 |
2000 |
2300 |
Mg (ppm) |
840 |
550 |
400 |
340 |
400 |
SO4-S (meq/L) |
8.6 |
1.3 |
7.5 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
Na (ppm) |
100 |
74 |
53 |
40 |
50 |
Cl (ppm) |
110.1 |
22.0 |
23.8 |
22.7 |
34.8 |
CEC (meq/100 g) |
24 |
21 |
19 |
13 |
16 |
pH |
7.1 |
6.9 |
5.5 |
6.8 |
7.2 |
*The designations “Healthy Green, Yellow 1, Yellow 2 and so on correspond with the same designations for the leaves above, meaning they come from the same fields.
Discussion: This issue of yellowing leaves in raspberry is not being caused by insects, mites or disease but we do find a striking difference in the concentration of some nutrients in affected leaves and the soils from from which they come. Since all the fields in question here are being managed by extremely competent and experienced growers we can be certain this nutritional deficiency is not being caused by a simple lack of fertilizer application, so we must explore this a little further.
All of the plants experiencing leaf yellowing and senescence are being grown in macro-tunnels. The PCA attending each of these fields reports that they have been very warm on the inside compared to outside and interestingly found a high level of humidity as well. This adds something to our investigation, since high temperatures can be a factor affecting the growth of plants, especially plants such as raspberry adapted to temperate climates. Heat injury in plants often results leaf yellowing and senescence.
Leaf nitrogen and phosphorous are lower in yellow leaves than green leaves. Leaf senescence is often preceded by the degradation and subsequent loss of chlorophyll, the lack of which of course means the leaf stops being green. A quick perusal of a book concerned with the mineral nutrition of plants (the excellent “Mineral Nutrition of Plants” by Horst Marschner I recommend highly) tells us that leaf senescence results in a net mobilization or export of nutrients from the dying tissue to still living and growing tissue. And we are seeing exactly this in the fields, since the plant tops continue to flourish and produce flowers and fruit all the while the bottoms are yellowing and dying.
But what of the higher concentrations of calcium in yellow leaves compared to green? They are quite high, near or above what are normally considered levels of sufficiency. Calcium, in contrast with other plant essential minerals is moved from the roots to the rest of the plant via evapotranspiration through the water conducting elements (also known as the xylem). This is meaningful since this means we tend to see higher levels of calcium deposition in plants moving lots of water.
Soil concentrations of nitrate, sodium and chloride are all low in fields experiencing leaf yellowing and necrosis. Knowing however that all three are leachable by water is again helpful.
The Bottom Line: What we are getting is that the tunnels are hot and killing some of the leaves towards the bottom of the plant. The plants continue to grow though, reallocating nutrients from the dying leaves to the younger ones and pulling up plenty of water because the rate of evapotranspiration is high in the heat of the tunnel. The grower response of adding more water to keep up is of course the correct one, but this is resulting in a lot of leaching. For salts like sodium and chloride this good, for a plant essential ion like nitrate it is not. So not only is nitrogen being transported away from the dying leaves, it is also being leached away in the soil before the plant can get it.
Probably the best response to this situation would be the one which has already been taken, and that is to open the tunnels to enhance air circulation and lower the internal temperatures.
I would like to thank PCA Eryn Gray for sharing his data and insight along with the growers involved in this work without whose participation none of this would have possible.
- Author: Mark Bolda
Here is an interesting case regarding a slight purpling of the newer leaves of raspberry. While the case below involves ‘Polka’ variety red raspberry, I’ve seen it this year on ‘Josephine’ red raspberry in a different field as well.
The question posed is whether this purpling is meaningful from a plant health standpoint. Will this problem get worse and detract from yield and cause problems with next years crop?
For starters, there is are no disease symptoms, for example necrotic spots or goo seeping out out of the leaves or stems, nor are there any signs of disease, such as spores or conidial structures visible.
We should consider also possible side effects of insecticide or fungicide sprays. I do recall once in a trial on the strawberry variety ‘Diamante’ that repeated applications of a strobilurin fungicide such as Pristine or Quadris resulted in a similar pattern of purpling on the leaves. However in this case on ‘Polka’, the PCA in charge of this field confirmed with me that Pristine had been applied after the symptoms appeared, and this is only one application of the material. There was only one other pesticide application previous to this one, and it was more than a month ago.
What about nutrient deficiency? A simple application of what we know from nutrient deficiency books would inform us that the purpling we see here refers to some sort of phosphorous deficiency, but other nutrients can cause this too. Furthermore, those having more than a passing knowledge of the agricultural soils in the Pajaro and Salinas valleys know they are rarely phosphorous deficient, and more often than not actually have an excess of this nutrient.
Which brings us to nitrogen. Nitrogen, while commonly associated with yellowing rather than purpling of leaves, leaches out of the soil easily and as such can be deficient even in the rich soils of the California central coast. As we know, nitrogen deficiencies can be manifested in plants as a reddening or purpling of the leaves stemming from an accumulation of the same carbohydrates resulting from phosphorous deficiency.
The only way we are going to know if the above has any truth to it at all however is to take some leaf samples. The chart below is from a bulk sample consisting of at least twenty leaves, each taken from around the fifth leaf of the plant (note that this is a bit younger than the seventh leaf common for sampling, but the purpling was only found at this stage and younger).
Samples were analyzed by the Soil Control Lab in Watsonville.
Nutrient |
Purple leaves |
Green leaves |
Total Nitrogen |
2.4% |
2.6% |
Total Phosphorous |
0.28% |
0.29% |
Total Potassium |
1.3% |
1.1% |
Calcium |
1.3% |
1.8% |
Magnesium |
0.53% |
0.65% |
Total Sulfur |
0.2% |
0.2% |
Copper |
6.1ppm |
7.5 ppm |
Zinc |
26 ppm |
26 ppm |
Iron |
220 ppm |
260 ppm |
Manganese |
210 ppm |
190 ppm |
Boron |
46 ppm |
60 ppm |
Molybdenum |
3.6 ppm |
5.4 ppm |
The chart above shows us that for one there are no dramatic differences between in nutrient concentrations of green leaves compared to those which are purple. On the other hand, concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium are trending just a tad low, with perhaps the nitrogen being the most significant especially since the sampled leaves were on the young side.
- Author: Mark Bolda
Zeal (etoxazole) is now registered for control of phytophagous mites in caneberries. Zeal is a very welcome addition to our limited suite of miticides in caneberries. Link to the label is here:
http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld7DK007.pdf
Had lunch at the Nickel with Tom Dewitt from Valent to get some clarification on the use of this material. Our conversation was as follows:
Breadth of Control: Zeal controls phytophagous mites in the Tetranychid family very well, so this includes both twospotted spider mites and Lewis mites. It does not kill eriophyid mites such as redberry mite nor tarsonemid mites such as cyclamen mite. As a translaminar material, it doesn't matter that the residue doesn't stick around that long on the leaf surface, since plant feeding mites will still pick it up when they penetrate the leaves to feed. It is important then also to not apply Zeal with surfactants that are stickers because they will impede the translaminar activity and instead to go with a good nonionic surfactant.
Activity on Predatory Mites: Zeal should not be applied on top of a population of predatory P. persimilis mites since it renders the males sterile and the population will cease to grow. It is recommended to hold off on releasing predatory mites until 30 days after an application of Zeal so as not to impede with their activity.
MRL's: Growers and shippers please take note that while Zeal now has a MRL (maximum residue limit) for Canada in strawberries, it does not have an MRL yet in caneberries.
I discuss the use of a miticide in this article. As always, before using this of product, check with your local Agricultural Commissioner's Office and absolutely consult the product label for product registration, restrictions, and use information.
- Author: Mark Bolda
The following is regarding a sample of raspberry sawfly submitted to this office this afternoon. This sawfly, very likely Monophadnoides geniculatus, is not that common on the Central Coast but the infestation described to me was sort of acute.
As one can see from the photos below, the larvae of the raspberry sawfly are rather bristly and run around 10 to 13 millimeters in length. The damage is distinctive, consisting of a patchwork of holes on infested leaves. The literature describes leaves being skeletonized by raspberry sawfly feeding, but I have yet to see anything as severe here.
The important part for growers and consultants to know is that raspberry sawfly is a wasp, not a moth or fly. It belongs to the family Tenthredinidae in the insect order Hymenoptera, which derive the common name of sawflies from the ovipositor of the females which is adapted for sawing. The female raspberry sawfly inserts her eggs into the leaves in May, and the larvae emerge obviously right around now. They feed for two to three weeks after which they drop to the ground to form a cocoon, from which the adult emerges the following year in the spring. There is only one generation per year.
From a pest management point of view on the Central Coast, the incidental damage we see on the leaves will not harm the plant and by any measure the damage is short lived and limited to the two to three week feeding period. However, growers who are concerned about incidental contamination of the harvested fruit from a medium to heavy raspberry sawfly infestation may want to treat.
Thanks to the PCA and his apprentice for bringing these samples by the office this afternoon. It really helps me keep current on what is going on out there.