- Author: Mark Bolda
While raspberry crown borer, Pennisetia marginata, is not an unusual pest in local blackberries, this is the first time we've found it in raspberry on the Central Coast for a while.
As one can see from the the first photo below, the wilt of the affected raspberry plant is quite sudden. Unlike what we find in blackberry however, the borehole in these raspberries is well below the soil line, more than a half an inch easily. Pointing to a diversity of population, some channels leading into the cane from the borehole were empty, while others had larvae and yet others had soon to eclose pupae nestled within.
There are several approaches to management of raspberry crown borer. The commonly practiced shortened production period of two years or less of raspberries on the Central Coast goes a long way to limiting the establishment and in my mind has made greatly minimized the presence of this pest in its namesake host. In short, removal of infested cane will do a lot in limiting infestations, especially if one is removing canes with late stage raspberry crown borer within.
There are also pesticides labeled for use against raspberry crown borer, and these can be effective, especially over a two year term of treatment in bringing infestations under control. Please note the restrictions and special conditions of these two:
Diazinon is registered for a drench application for raspberry crown borer, but the label restricts this application to “spring, before bud break. Potential users of Diazinon should be aware that there are water quality issues associated with this pesticide.
Admire has a label for caneberries, the only caveat would be the 7 day PHI and caution to not use it when bees are actively foraging. This is a material that is going to be traveling around actively in the plant, but one should bear in mind that applications should be made with plenty of water as the active ingredient in Admire of imidacloprid has a real affinity for soil particles and can get hung up there if there isn’t enough water behind it.
8/29/13 addition: If making the decision to use Admire, please do take note that this material should not be applied during bloom and when bees are foraging.
Thanks to the grower for having me out, I always appreciated getting these calls to come out and have a look at something new and interesting.
The above article discusses the use of several pesticides for management of raspberry crown borer in caneberries. As always, before using any of these products, check with your local Agricultural Commissioner's Office and consult product labels for current status of product registration, restrictions, and use information.
- Author: Mark Bolda
This is an announcement regarding a review of strawberry transplanting. The meeting will take place at the ALBA ranch on 1700 Old Stage Road in Salinas. We will review topics such as important qualities of strawberry transplanting, keys of plant chill and maintenance of second year strawberry plantings.
Link to agenda is here:
http://cesantacruz.ucanr.edu/files/170334.pdf
The program of this meeting will be presented in Spanish, with translation into English.
- Author: Mark Bolda
- Author: Shimat Joseph
The following is the link to access most of the powerpoint presentations given at the Twospotted Spider Mite meeting given this past June 27.
http://cemonterey.ucanr.edu/Agriculture/Mite_Pest_Management_in_Strawberry_6_27_2013/
/span>- Author: Steven Koike
- Author: Mark Bolda
While the recently detected charcoal rot disease (caused by the soilborne fungus Macrophomina phaseolina) was causing collapse of strawberry plants from various parts of California, a second soilborne issue was simultaneously affecting other fields. Fusarium wilt was first confirmed on California strawberry in 2006. Initially found in Ventura County, Fusarium wilt is now present on strawberry in Santa Barbara and Monterey counties. The spread of Fusarium wilt in the state, along with the increasing problems with Macrophomina, poses long term threats to the strawberry industry which at present does not have satisfactory plant resistance to both of these pathogens and which is facing a changing future without traditional fumigant products.
Symptoms of Fusarium wilt in strawberry consist of wilting of foliage, plant stunting, and drying and death of foliage (Figure 1). When plant crowns are cut open, internal vascular and cortex tissues are dark to orange brown (Figure 2). Disease is often most severe if the infected plant is subject to stresses such as weather extremes, water stress (shortage of water), poor soil conditions, or heavy fruit loads. In locations where the disease has occurred for more than one season, the patches can be quite large and appear to have spread from the initial problem area (Figure 3). Such patterns are consistent with the spread of a soilborne pathogen. It is noteworthy that in these cases we have never isolated other important, well known pathogens such as Colletotrichum, Phytophthora, or Verticillium. However, it is important to note that Fusarium wilt symptoms are virtually identical to those caused by charcoal rot. To complicate matters further, in some fields we have found both Fusarium and Macrophomina infecting the same crop. This overlap of symptoms means that growers and field personnel should have plants tested by a pathology lab in order to confirm which soilborne disease they are encountering.
Fusarium wilt is caused by the fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae. This pathogen is host specific to strawberry and can only infect this crop. The fungus survives in the soil for long periods by producing resilient, microscopic structures called chlamydospores (Figure 4). The development of Fusarium wilt has also been associated with changes in the practices of pre-plant soil fumigation. The fungus is spread within and between fields mostly by the transport of contaminated soil during soil tillage and preparation operations.
Current management strategies involve the following: (1) Crop rotation. Do not plant strawberry in fields having a known history of the problem and avoid back-to-back strawberry plantings in infested locations. (2) Pre-plant fumigation. This remains a useful tool for managing Fusarium and the other soilborne pests, even though bed-applied fumigants may not provide complete control. (3) Avoid stressing the plants. Stress will hasten the development and increase the severity of symptoms, so use appropriate growing and irrigation practices to reduce stress. Note, however, that even in the absence of stress, infected plants will eventually develop the disease. (4) Sanitation. Growers with Fusarium infested fields need to be concerned with limiting the spread of the fungus from infested to clean fields.
- Author: Steven Koike
- Author: Mark Bolda
Beginning at least as early as 2005 and continuing through 2013, collapsing strawberry plants from various parts of California have been associated with the soilborne fungus Macrophomina phaseolina. The disease, called charcoal rot, appears to be the most important current concern for the industry due to its steady increase over this period of time. Each year finds additional new fields infested, and the disease has now been found in all of the major strawberry producing counties in the state. In 2005-2006, charcoal rot was restricted to southern California in Orange and Ventura counties. Most recently this disease has been confirmed in Santa Barbara, Monterey, Santa Cruz, and Santa Clara counties. The spread of Macrophomina to new fields and counties portends that charcoal rot may be a long term threat to the industry which at present does not have satisfactory plant resistance with which to combat the pathogen.
Symptoms of Macrophomina infection in strawberry consist of wilting of foliage, plant stunting, and drying and death of older leaves, with the central youngest leaves often remaining green and alive. Plants can eventually collapse and die (Figure 1). When plant crowns are cut open, internal vascular and cortex tissues are dark to orange brown (Figure 2). Disease is often most severe if the infected plant is subject to stresses such as weather extremes, water stress (shortage of water), poor soil conditions, or heavy fruit loads. In locations where the disease has occurred for more than one season, the patches can be quite large and appear to have spread from the initial problem area (Figure 3). Such patterns are consistent with the spread of a soilborne pathogen. It is noteworthy that in these cases we have never isolated other important, well known pathogens such as Colletotrichum, Phytophthora, or Verticillium. However, it is important to note that another recently described disease, Fusarium wilt, is also occurring in the same regions; symptoms of Fusarium wilt are identical to those caused by charcoal rot.
Macrophomina produces numerous tiny, black, irregularly shaped microsclerotia (Figure 4). These microsclerotia are survival structures that allow the fungus to persist for extended periods in the soil. The fungus is spread within and between fields mostly by the transport of contaminated soil during soil tillage and preparation operations. Spread of Macrophomina in strawberry fields deals with the same issue of field sanitation that concerns growers of many other commodities. Verticillium wilt (lettuce, strawberry, pepper), clubroot (broccoli, cauliflower), Fusarium wilt (lettuce), Fusarium yellows (celery), and lettuce dieback disease (lettuce) are all problems caused by soilborne pathogens that are spread in infested soil.
Current management strategies involve the following: (1) Crop rotation. Do not plant strawberry in fields having a known history of the problem and avoid back-to-back strawberry plantings in infested locations. (2) Pre-plant fumigation. This remains a useful tool for managing Macrophomina and the other soilborne pests, even though bed-applied fumigants may not provide complete control. (3) Avoid stressing the plants. Stress will hasten the development and increase the severity of symptoms, so use appropriate growing and irrigation practices to reduce stress. Note, however, that even in the absence of stress, infected plants will eventually develop the disease. (4) Sanitation. Growers with Macrophomina infested fields need to be concerned with limiting the spread of the fungus from infested to clean fields.