- Posted By: Mark Bolda
- Written by: Mark Bolda and Kelly Hamby
A rather thorough presentation of one year’s worth of work on spotted wing drosophila was made at the big entomology meeting on September 13. As this presentation will not be posted anywhere, the following will be a summary of the work and what we know so far, along with some pointers that may be useful for growers to follow in their efforts to control this pest.
Along with various private industry efforts, the work that is being done right now by UC Davis and UCCE on spotted wing drosophila is important. The California caneberry industry is 56% of the national fresh market production and has a production cycle on the Central Coast starting in April and continuing on until December, creating a situation of considerable potential of economic harm for this pernicious pest.
The trapping portion of this study tested two common bait formulations, yeast + sugar + water and apple cider vinegar, against a water control from late October 2010 to early September 2011. We are still in the first year of the study so it is a bit early to draw conclusions, but over time the yeast + sugar + water perhaps performed a little better than the apple cider vinegar. Both baits tended to follow the same pattern meaning there was a period of no response to the traps (they caught very few adult flies) from late February to late May and a large increase of adult flies in the late season. Additionally, there tended to be more females trapped than males. Whether this is a function of there simply being more females in the field than males or that the traps are simply more attractive to females remains something to be investigated.
Sampling for larvae which began mid-May of this year seems to indicate the first generation of larvae may appear before any noticeable adult fly population, and this continues later on through the season as larval peaks correlate with adult population peaks. Larval and adult fly populations peak after the end of harvest, which only underlines that growers remove the crop as soon as possible after the cessation of fruit production.
A remaining target for us is the whereabouts of the population of spotted wing drosophila during the period of no response to traps (late February to late May). We are not trapping flies in the fields, but obviously they start to come from somewhere when the season gets underway again in the spring. We must understand what is going on here, as these stages of low pest activity tend to historically be the areas where the strongest measures of integrated pest management can be applied.
- Posted By: Mark Bolda
- Written by: Mark Bolda
On occasion, we do run across ideas on how to improve our current efforts in developing a decent control regime for the spotted wing drosophila.
The use of sake ("rice wine", correctly pronounced as sa-KKE, not saki) as a trapping medium is one of those ideas. Initially mentioned in the groundbreaking Kanazawa paper from the 1930's, it was also the subject recently of a short program on NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation) on managing vinegar and other flies in the household.
With the generosity of Patrick Kingston, replications of this sake trap (200 ml vinegar, 100 ml sake, 3.5 oz sugar and dubbed the "sake bomb") were tested in the same raspberry field as the standard yeast sugar water (0.25 oz yeast, 4 tsp sugar, 300 ml water) trap. As one can instantly see from the chart below, this trap is not as effective as the yeast sugar water trap. Interestingly, there does seem to be a trend in the yeast sugar water trap depending how close it was placed to a potential source of a lot of spotted wing drosophila, a sensitivity not apparent in the sake trap.
Of interest, however, is the fact that the "sake bomb" was quite effective, much more than the yeast sugar water trap, in drawing in some six other species of flies, including houseflies. This could be useful information in the case of future infestations of exotic flies.
- Posted By: Mark Bolda
- Written by: Mark Bolda
A major extension event concerning entomology in strawberries and caneberries is planned for September 13, 2011.
Experts in entomology from the UC, the California Strawberry Commission, private industry as well as Agricultural Commissioner Mary Lou Nicoletti will inform attendees about the latest in lygus bugs, LBAM, EGVM, SWD, twospotted spider mites, and Lewis mites.
All are welcome, please refer to link to agenda below:
http://ucanr.org/berryentomology2011
- Posted By: Mark Bolda
- Written by: Mark Bolda
As many Central Coast caneberry growers know, this summer season has seen an astonishing number of lygus bugs in blackberries. Counts of 10 to 20 lygus bugs per shake easily rival the heaviest infestations in strawberry.
However, contrary to the “catfacing” or misshapen fruit left by lygus activity in strawberry, there does not seem to be a documented type of damage from lygus in blackberry. All the same, customers have been getting tetchy about having bugs in their baskets of fruit, so it is indeed important for us as an industry to take this on.
Unfortunately, management of lygus in blackberry has proven to be just as difficult in blackberry as strawberry, perhaps even more so since there are fewer insecticides registered for use in blackberries.
Thrips incidentally occur in blackberry flowers as well and did in great numbers in this trial. Again it is not certain whether or not they cause a lot of damage. Nevertheless, thrips were also evaluated in this trial since they are a known pest in other crops and situations.
The organically registered insecticides MPede and Aza-Direct have shown promise in controlling stink bugs (same insect order as lygus bugs), so the study described below is a screen these two materials compared against a grower applied standard of Diazinon along with an untreated control.
Trial was composed of 4 24 ft x 26 ft replicated treatments in a blackberry field with significant lygus and thrips activity. MPede and Aza-Direct were applied with a motorized backpack sprayer by Brian Deeter from Gowan Company. Diazinon was applied at the label rate by the grower in an adjacent block, so while not part of the experimental design, it did provide reasonably strong information in comparison to the three other treatments.
My research assistant and I did the evaluations which consisted of shaking 3 feet of flowering blackberry hedgerow into a five gallon bucket for the lygus and agitating three mature flowers individually onto a white sheet of paper and counting the expulsed thrips there. Dates of evaluation were August 11 (pre-application), August 15 and August 19 (one week post application).
As the reader can see from the chart below, beyond Diazinon there is little effect on field populations of lygus or thrips from either MPede or Aza-Direct. Furthermore, the lack of thorough control of lygus and thrips by Diazinon, long regarded as one of the most powerful pesticides available to blackberry growers, is unsettling.
Character Rated |
lygus |
thrips |
lygus |
thrips |
lygus |
thrips |
|||||||
Rating Date |
Pre-app |
Pre-app |
8/15/2011 |
8/15/2011 |
8/19/2011 |
8/19/2011 |
|||||||
1 |
MPede + Aza-Direct |
35.75 |
a |
84.50 |
a |
31.50 |
a |
72.00 |
ab |
16.50 |
a |
54.75 |
ab |
2 |
MPede |
28.75 |
a |
56.50 |
a |
37.25 |
a |
120.25 |
a |
19.50 |
a |
67.75 |
a |
3 |
UTC |
36.00 |
a |
73.50 |
a |
34.75 |
a |
104.75 |
a |
15.50 |
a |
52.00 |
ab |
4 |
Diazinon |
22.50 |
a |
38.25 |
a |
11.25 |
b |
34.50 |
b |
11.50 |
a |
24.25 |
b |
Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)
Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.
Finally, it will be worth my while to return to this field to evaluate the effect, if any, this pest load is having on fruit development. As already mentioned above, beyond the contamination of harvested fruit, thrips and lygus damage to blackberry has not yet been well defined.
There are a number of pesticides mentioned for management of lygus and thrips in this article. Before using any of these products, check with your local Agricultural Commissioner's Office and consult product labels for current status of product registration, restrictions, and use information.
- Posted By: Mark Bolda
- Written by: Mark Bolda
It was perhaps only inevitable that some laboratory work with a private industry researcher has discovered a high level of tolerance, maybe even resistance, to the popular organically registered pesticide Pyganic (active ingredient pyrethrin) in spotted wing drosophila. Using the system of Petri plates photographed below, groups numbering from 15 to 22 flies were subjected to the label rate (18 fl oz) and twice the label rate (36 fl oz) of Pyganic 5.0 II with the result that spraying them had very little effect and most survived. This has been repeated several times, so we know it is not by chance that this is happening.
The population subjected to this laboratory testing has been exposed in the source field to many applications of Pyganic- there's not a lot of choices in organic culture- over the past two years, so it comes as no surprise. Admittedly it seems rather fast. Do note also that pyrethrin is a weaker version of the synthetic pyrethroids such as zeta cyper-methrin (Mustang Max) and bifenthrin (Brigrade) so we do have a flashing yellow with these materials also.
It is so important that we continue to rotate the pesticides we are using against spotted wing drosophila.