Glozer Dr, Kitren

Ferguson, Louise

Rosecrans, Richard :

Krueger, William H

Burns, Jackie :

Glozer et al . 1 California Olive Committee 2007 Annual Report Evaluation of antioxidants to reduce physical damage in â?? Manzanillo â?? olives in 2007 Project Leaders : Kitren Glozer and Louise Ferguson , Plant Sciences Department , U . C . Davis Rich Rosecrance , California State University Chico William Krueger , UCCE Farm Advisor , Glenn County Jackie Burns , University of Florida Reporting period : 2007 - 2008 report ABSTRACT Table olive quality must be maintained while need for mechanized harvest increases . Antioxidant tests made in 2006 on â?? Manzanillo â?? olives subjected to physical damage simulating mechanical harvest evaluated glutathione , ascorbic acid , a lactic / acetic acid solution , quercetin and luteolin . Several of these are naturally - occurring in olive or other fruits . Ascorbic acid appeared the most promising as a drench in 2006 . In 2007 trials we tested drenches of ascorbic acid , a â?? cocktail â?? of ascorbic acid , calcium lactate and cysteine ( Gorny et al . , 2002 ) , and two commercial treatments for specific postharvest applications ( ethoxyquin and diphenylamine ; ETOX and DPA , respectively ) ; a preharvest spray application of ascorbic acid was also tested . Repeated trials tested antioxidant concentration and length of drench time to find the best combination for reducing bruising and softening in fruit mechanically damaged by machine harvest and by shaking in a closed container to simulate mechanical harvest . Replicated and non - replicated trials were conducted in commercial and trial orchards in California ; results were similar regardless of location or orchard conditions . Ascorbic acid , ETOX and DPA showed significant reduction of bruise development over time and improved firmness compared to mechanically damaged , untreated fruit ; effectiveness for antioxidants was improved as concentration and time of exposure were increased . Optimum results were gained with ETOX and DPA , however , the optima were at immersion times or concentrations in excess of what could be expected for commercial purposes . These extended periods of exposure at high concentrations were used to gain information on what damage mitigation may be expected of an ideal treatment . We also tested the ethylene binding inhibitor , 1 - MCP ( 1 - methylcyclopropene ) , in controlled atmosphere for improvement in firmness after mechanical damage in a pilot test . INTRODUCTION Mechanical harvest of olives results in varying levels of visible damage within hours of fruit removal . Damage becomes more visible over time as the fruit is exposed to air and ambient temperatures after harvest . Bruising consists of a local degradation of tissue combined with intracellular water exit ( free water ) and browning ( oxidation ) of phenolic compounds from released intracellular water . As fruit sit in bins in the field , at the receiving station , in transit , or at the processing plant , prior to processing , oxidative processes continue and fruit damaged in harvest deteriorates noticeably ; high ambient Glozer et al . 2 temperatures exacerbate fruit damage due to mechanical injury . Significant advances have been made in 2006 - 2007 toward reducing mechanical damage to olives that are mechanically harvested . These advances have addressed the process of olive removal from the tree and reduction of cuts and bruises , however , optimal quality similar to that of hand - harvested fruit is a goal that may be facilitated with preharvest or postharvest treatments . L - ascorbic acid ( vitamin C ) is a well - known antioxidant that may be used in food applications as a â?? reduced risk â?? chemical . Other viable candidates for maintaining fruit quality could be postharvest applications for pome or stone fruits , such as postharvest chilling , controlled atmosphere and drenches . Our tests in 2007 explored some of these options , building on results obtained in 2006 . OBJECTIVES 1 . Investigate antioxidant potential for reduction of damage due to simulated mechanical harvest ; 2 . Test treatments varying application method ( preharvest spray , postharvest drench ) , exposure time and concentration to maximize benefit and obtain baseline information about maximum damage reduction that might be expected of an ideal treatment . An ethylene - binding inhibitor was also tested in a controlled atmosphere pilot study ; and 3 . Develop a strategy that would be consistent with mechanized harvest , postharvest transportation and short - term storage , and the goals of fruit quality necessary for a high - quality processed product . PROCEDURES Trials included : 1 . Fruit hand - harvested and subjected to mechanical damage from : a . UC Riversideâ??s Lindcove Research and Extension Center ( trees planted 1989 , spacing 25 â?? x 25 â?? ) â?? replicated and non - replicated trials b . UC Davis Nickels Soil Lab in Arbuckle ( trees planted 2001 at 12 â?? x 18 â?? in hedgerow ) â?? replicated and non - replicated trials c . UC Davis Pomology orchard ( Davis ; trees of variable ages and spacings ) 2 . Hand - harvested and machine - harvested â?? Manzanillo â?? fruit from one of the Rocky Hill commercial orchard ( Exeter ) machine harvest trials and from a demonstration of mechanical harvester at Nickels Soil Lab , Arbuckle . Although sites varied geographically , in age , and management practices , all trees used had moderate to heavy crops and fruit of similar sizes and maturity ( by color ) . The trial period extended from 20 September through 8 November . Only the trial on 8 November at the UCDavis orchard included a few fruit that were not hard green or yellow - green ( Olive Maturity Index Calculator , 2006 ; http : / / cesonoma.ucdavis.edu / SpecialtyCrops / Olives.htm ) . The IOOC ( 1990 ; International Olive Oil Council ) recognizes â?? green â?? as â?? . . . full size , and the color of the fruit may vary from green to straw yellow . â?? ( Colmagro et al . , 2001 ) . Those fruit in the last trial included a few that were â?? turning color â?? in order to compare firmness changes with maturation and the effect of antioxidants and an ethylene - binding inhibitor on firmness loss due to mechanical damage . . When fruit were hand - harvested and treated to simulated mechanical harvest , that treatment initially consisted of shaking a 20 to 50 - fruit sample in a large closed glass jar or 5 gallon plastic bucket with lid Glozer et al . 3 for 7 seconds , as in 2006 , with external and internal damage induced in this manner similar to that of mechanically - harvested fruit , in trials up to 4 October . Fruit quality of mechanically - harvested fruit was greatly improved in 2007 trials with Dave Smith Enterprises harvester and other harvesters observed in a demonstration at Nickels Soil Lab on 11 October . Thus with trials beginning 4 October shaking was reduced to 3 - 4 seconds to more closely match 2007 machine - harvested fruit . Mechanical damage was induced within 30 to 60 minutes of hand harvest in all cases . Antioxidant treatments were either by preharvest spray application ( handspray bottle to drip , ascorbic acid + Regulaid ) or by immersion ( drench , aqueous solutions ) for varying lengths of time from 5 minutes to overnight . All antioxidant drench treatments were applied within 1 hour of mechanical damage , whether machine - harvested or ® simulated treatment . Drenches included ascorbic acid , ethoxyquin ( ETOX ; Deccoquin 305 ) , diphenylamine ( NoScald 283 DPA ) or a â?? cocktail â?? of ascorbic acid , calcium lactate and cysteine ( Gorny et al . , 2002 ) . The concentrations of each treatment tested was within experimental or label ranges that were effective in trials on other fruits for reduction of oxidative damage . Duration of drenches in commercial products were generally in excess of label instructions , however , since one of the goals of this project was to test the potential for reduction of bruising and softening by postharvest treatments , test materials were applied under a broad range of conditions . Ultimately , criteria for evaluation of fruit quality and treatment potential will be developed in cooperation with University researchers and industry food quality technologists . Depending on the particular trial , fruit subjected to testing were either a bulk sample without replication , such as those collected from harvest bins in the machine harvest / hand harvest trial , or were from complete randomized block design applications made to fruit from replicate shoots . In each trial fruit were evaluated after antioxidant treatment , followed by an â?? overnight â?? period of at least 8 hours , uncut and at ambient temperatures of ~ 75 ºF . Fruit were then evaluated visually for surface bruising and internal bruising on a median cut surface , rating bruising on a 0 - 4 scale , with 0 = no visible damage , and 4 = severe damage , combining evaluation of external and internal bruising together ( in 2006 internal and external damage were rated separately ) . In the final trial on 8 November , fruit treated with antioxidant drenches were evaluated for change in firmness using a FirmTech II firmness testing device ( BioWorks , Inc . ; http : / / www.bio - works.us / ) ; this device is the standard for firmness testing for the sweet cherry industry in California and Chile , and other fruit industries and researchers in various locations . In that last trial , a â?? shaken â?? and â?? unshaken â?? sample of fruit were also treated overnight to a controlled atmosphere application of 1 ppm 1 - MCP , followed by firmness testing . Analyses of variance were performed with Proc GLM procedure of SAS ( SAS Institute Inc . , Cary , NC ) and mean separations were tested by Duncan = s Multiple Range Test ; P = 0.05 . RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The initial test of antioxidants in 2007 used an overnight drench of ascorbic acid compared to 5 minute drenches of three other antioxidant treatments ( Table 1 , Fig . 1 ) . The overnight drench was used in 2006 and proved somewhat effective in reducing the severity of bruising , however , when comparing this treatment to the short duration treatments of antioxidant â?? cocktail â?? , ETOX and DPA , it was evident that long soaking created halos of water - damaged flesh surrounding bruises that was unacceptable . Although the ascorbic acid treatment significantly reduced the severity of bruising , it was rated lower than other treatments that also reduced bruising development based on the water - logged appearance . All antioxidant treatments were significantly better than the untreated , shaken control either with respect to reduction of external bruising , internal bruising or both ; the â?? cocktail â?? improved bruising internally , but external bruising ( as with overnight ascorbic acid drench ) was not improved to the same extent as other treatments . Glozer et al . 4 Table 1 . Comparison of drench treatments with antioxidants and their effect on mechanical damage appearance in â?? Manzanillo â?? olive in 2007 ; non - replicated trial 17 September at Exeter , Lindcove Research and Extension Center . Test for length of drench , concentration , antioxidant type for further trials . Mechanical Exposure to Appearance z Antioxidant treatment y damage antioxidant drench rating x Untreated Unshaken 0.0 c none Untreated 3.8 a 1000 ppm L - ascorbic acid ~ 8 hours 2.5 ab Shaken â?? cocktail â?? w / v 2 % ascorbic acid , 1 % 2.5 ab calcium lactate , 0.5 % cysteine , pH 7 5 min 2700 ppm ethoxyquin ( ETOX ) 2.0 b 2000 ppm diphenylamine ( DPA ) 2.0 b x Mean separation within columns by Duncanâ??s Multiple Range Test , P = 0.05 . y Visual evaluation for surface bruising and internal bruising on a median cut surface , rating bruising on a 0 - 4 scale , with 0 = no visible damage , and 4 = severe damage , combining evaluation of external and internal bruising together . z Chemical treatment concentrations based either on previous study efficacy or on upper label recommendation . All fruit evaluated ~ 8 hr after damage imposed . All treatments at ambient temperature . The second and third trials represented in Table 2 were identically applied at 2 locations , at slightly different times , but on fruit of similar maturity . These results were not different by location and are shown combine . In these cases , ascorbic acid was also tested as a preharvest spray treatment , and compared to 5 minute drenches of ascorbic acid , ETOX and DPA , and controls . Although fruit treated in antioxidant drenches showed some reduction of bruising severity , none was acceptable . Preharvest application of ascorbic acid did not control bruising . Drench duration of ascorbic acid , ETOX and DPA were tested at intervals for efficacy ; increased time from 5 minutes , to 15 and 30 minutes , showed significant improvement with increase in exposure of fruit ( Table 3 ) . Fruit exposed for 30 minutes showed very little development of bruising with all treatments . These same treatments were used to test effects on bruising in fruit obtained from mechanical harvesting by DSE at Rocky Hill ( Table 4 ) . In this trial fruit damage was less than that in the 2006 mechanical harvest trial and less than that imposed by shaking to - date . Amelioration of bruising injury was similar to that in previous 30 minute drenches with these materials , with respect to relative reduction of injury among treatments ; bruising was low overall and decreased further by antioxidant treatments with DPA and ETOX slightly better than ascorbic acid . A comparison of antioxidants at varying concentration and duration of drench following simulated mechanical harvest at lower injury induced ( Table 5 ) found that treatment with 2000 ppm DPA for 30 min . resulted in fruit damage statistically identical to that of untreated , unshaken fruit . Slightly less effective was 2000 DPA for 15 min . and 3000 ppm ascorbic acid for 30 min . Other treatments were intermediate to these and the untreated , shaken control in bruising . When fruit that had been harvested by a Coe harvester was evaluated ( Table 6 ) , damage was less than that from the DSE harvester , and the slight bruising was not changed noticeably by antioxidant treatment . Glozer et al . 5 A final trial to test treatment effects of antioxidant drenches and 1 - MCP on firmness of damaged green fruit found a slight numeric but non - significant improvement in firmness compared to the untreated , shaken control by DPA and ETOX ( Table 7 ) . 1 - MCP decreased firmness of unshaken fruit compared to the untreated , unshaken control , and of shaken fruit , compared to the untreated , shaken control . Firmness in colored fruit that had been shaken was significantly improved by treatment with DPA ; a numeric but non - significant improvement was found with ETOX as well . Again , 1 - MCP decreased fruit firmness in the more mature fruit . Fruit numbers were small in this trial , thus results should be considered very preliminary , however , tests with larger sample sizes should be conducted in future . Table 2 . Comparison of spray and drench treatments with antioxidants and their effect on mechanical damage appearance in â?? Manzanillo â?? olive in 2007 ; replicated trials at Exeter , Lindcove Research and Extension Center and Arbuckle , Nickels Soil Lab , September 17 - 21 and 26 - 28 , respectively , 3 replicate fruiting shoots per treatment . Analysis of results showed no difference by location ; results shown are compiled across locations . Exposure to y Antioxidant treatment Mechanical damage Appearance rating z antioxidant x Untreated Unshaken 0.0 c none Untreated 3.8 a 0.15 % Regulaid spray 3.8 a ( control ) 3 days prior to harvest 1000 ppm L - ascorbic acid + 3.4 ab 0.15 % Regulaid spray 1000 ppm L - ascorbic acid Shaken 2.8 ab drench 2700 ppm ethoxyquin 2.0 b 5 min drench ( ETOX ) 2000 ppm diphenylamine 2.0 b ( DPA ) x Mean separation within columns by Duncanâ??s Multiple Range Test , P = 0.05 ; experimental design CRBD , 3 replicate branches per treatment . y Visual evaluation for surface bruising and internal bruising on a median cut surface , rating bruising on a 0 - 4 scale , with 0 = no visible damage , and 4 = severe damage , combining evaluation of external and internal bruising together . z All fruit evaluated ~ 8 hr after damage imposed and antioxidant treatment . Glozer et al . 6 Table 3 . Comparison of drench treatments with antioxidants testing duration of drench on mechanical damage appearance in â?? Manzanillo â?? olive in 2007 ; non - replicated trial 1 October at Exeter , Lindcove Research and Extension Center . y Appearance rating Exposure to z Antioxidant treatment Mechanical damage antioxidant drench 5 min 15 min 30 min x Untreated Unshaken 0.0 c none Untreated 3.6 a 1000 ppm L - ascorbic acid 3.2 a 2.5 ab 1.0 bc Shaken 5 , 15 , 30 min 2700 ppm ethoxyquin 2.8 ab 1.5 b 0.8 bc intervals ( ETOX ) 2000 ppm diphenylamine 2.6 ab 1.3 b 0.9 bc ( DPA ) x Mean separation within columns by Duncanâ??s Multiple Range Test , P = 0.05 . y Visual evaluation for surface bruising and internal bruising on a median cut surface , rating bruising on a 0 - 4 scale , with 0 = no visible damage , and 4 = severe damage , combining evaluation of external and internal bruising together . z All fruit evaluated ~ 8 hr after damage imposed . All treatments at ambient temperature . Table 4 . Comparison of drench treatments with antioxidants and their effect on mechanical damage appearance in â?? Manzanillo â?? olive in 2007 ; non - replicated trial in Exeter , Rocky Hill commercial orchard , October 4 . Fruit sampled from Dave Smith Enterprises machine - harvested or hand - harvested trees , held at ambient temperature ( ~ 75 ºF ) 1 hr prior to antioxidant treatment . Exposure to y Antioxidant treatment Harvest method Appearance rating z antioxidant x Untreated Hand 0.0 c none Untreated 2.0 a 1000 ppm L - ascorbic acid 1.7 ab Machine 2700 ppm ethoxyquin 1.2 b 30 min drench ( ETOX ) 2000 ppm diphenylamine 1.3 b ( DPA ) x Mean separation within columns by Duncanâ??s Multiple Range Test , P = 0.05 . y Visual evaluation for surface bruising and internal bruising on a median cut surface , rating bruising on a 0 - 4 scale , with 0 = no visible damage , and 4 = severe damage , combining evaluation of external and internal bruising together . z All fruit evaluated ~ 8 hr after damage imposed and antioxidant treatment . Glozer et al . 7 Table 5 . Comparison of drench treatments with antioxidants at different concentrations : effect on mechanical damage appearance in â?? Manzanillo â?? olive in 2007 ; replicated trial in Arbuckle , Nickels Soil Lab on October 8 . All fruit mechanically damaged except as indicated ; duration of drench indicated . Damage induced by shaking was decreased in duration to match improved fruit quality of mechanical harvest observed with best machine harvest results at Rocky Hill . y Antioxidant treatment Appearance rating x Untreated , unshaken 0.1 d Untreated 2.6 a 1500 ppm L - ascorbic acid , 30 min 1.6 bc 3000 ppm L - ascorbic acid , 30 min 1.3 cd 1350 ppm ethoxyquin ( ETOX ) , 30 min 2.2 ab 2700 ppm ETOX , 5 min 2.5 ab 2700 ppm ETOX , 15 min 2.0 ab 2700 ppm ETOX , 30 min 1.8 bc 1000 ppm diphenylamine ( DPA ) , 30 min 2.0 ab 2000 ppm DPA , 5 min 2.0 ab 2000 ppm DPA , 15 min 1.2 cd 2000 ppm DPA , 30 min 0.4 d x Mean separation within columns by Duncanâ??s Multiple Range Test , P = 0.05 . Experimental design was a CRBD with 5 fruiting shoot replicates per treatment . y Visual evaluation for surface bruising and internal bruising on a median cut surface , rating bruising on a 0 - 4 scale , with 0 = no visible damage , and 4 = severe damage , combining evaluation of external and internal bruising together . Glozer et al . 8 Table 6 . Comparison of 30 minute drench treatments with antioxidants and their effect on mechanical damage appearance in â?? Manzanillo â?? olive in 2007 ; non - replicated trial in Arbuckle , Nickels Soil Lab on October 11 testing antioxidants on machine - harvested fruit ( Coe Harvester ) . y Antioxidant treatment Appearance rating x Untreated 0.7 a 3000 ppm L - ascorbic acid 0.7 a 2700 ppm ethoxyquin ( ETOX ) 0.5 a 2000 ppm diphenylamine ( DPA ) 0.7 a 3000 ppm ascorbic acid + 2700 ppm ETOX 0.5 a 3000 ppm ascorbic acid + 2000 ppm DPA 0.7 a x Mean separation within columns by Duncanâ??s Multiple Range Test , P = 0.05 . 15 fruit per treatment . y Visual evaluation for surface bruising and internal bruising on a median cut surface , rating bruising on a 0 - 4 scale , with 0 = no visible damage , and 4 = severe damage , combining evaluation of external and internal bruising together . 9 showing Pomology a b al . 686 464 atmosphere et Glozer fruit UCDavis â?? Colored â?? fruit a b b b effects . problem 816 607 controlled 658 670 All in tested . computer treatment trial and bc treatment bc non - replicated c a d b 607 816 464 686 y antioxidants 658 670 ( g ) to in Firmness due considered per lost fruit fruit 2007 ; firmness with â?? colored â?? bcd bc ab cd d a ( color ) Colored 296 622 treatments 580 462 384 442 in olive on 5 maturity and Data â?? Manzanillo â?? fruit drench fruit Fruit green c a b b b b minute 498 855 651 701 711 708 Green November ) . 25 in 0.05 . ( methylcyclopropene ) 30 by = Inc ) . P fruit Test , 8 damage evaluated ( BioWorks , mechanically - damaged Range unshaken unshaken shaken shaken shaken shaken shaken Mechanical Multiple firmness device 1 - MCP Duncanâ??s Firmness November , inhibitor of II by ( DPA ) firmness FirmTech ethylene - binding ( ETOX ) columns 7 green . made acid diphenylamine fruit within not treatment ( applications by ethoxyquin L - ascorbic measured skin on separation Effect of ppm ppm of Antioxidant less application Firmness 1 1 Untreated Untreated ppm ppm ppm 7 . 1 - MCP , 1 - MCP , or Orchard Mean Table 2700 2000 3000 50 % y x Glozer et al . 10 Untreated , unshaken Overnight ascorbic acid drench DPA drench 5 min Untreated , shaken ETOX 5 min drench 5 minute â?? cocktail â?? of ascorbic acid , calcium lactate , cysteine Fig . 1 . Appearance of fruit treated to mechanical damage , followed by antioxidant drenches and overnight ambient storage . Glozer et al . 11 CONCLUSIONS Drenches were more effective than the single spray treatment and DPA drenches appeared to be more effective , generally , than those with other antioxidants . Increasing concentration and duration of drench reduced bruising relative to those increases . Despite the promising results , however , the most effective treatments are in excess of recommendations on the label for other fruits . Efficacy may be increased by other adjuvants that encourage better penetration , reducing the need for long exposure times or high concentrations , however , adjuvants would also have to be approved for fruit use . In any treatments in future , residue testing before and after processing will be indicated . Antioxidant tests were more effective in reducing bruising than in 2006 , although the perceived need for such treatments may be less due to better mechanically - harvested fruit quality . Fruit from mechanical harvests that were evaluated by the processors show far more damage than those in these trials . This is probably due to longer time intervals for fruit in transport , high heat conditions , and holding time prior to evaluation . This fact alone , makes clear the need to work with the processors to address all sources for fruit damage , including postharvest . Acknowledgements We appreciate the use of the Lindcove Research and Extension Center , Nickels Soils Lab , grower and processor cooperation and the support of the California Olive Commission and California State University Chico in funding research . Funding Sources California Olive Commission and California State University Chico References Alscher RG 1989 Biosynthesis and antioxidant function of glutathione in plants . Physiol . Plant . 77 : 457 - 464 . Andrikopoulos , N.K . , A.C . Kaliora , A.N . Assimopoulou , and V.P . Papageorgiou . 2002 . Inhibitory activity of minor polyphenolic and nonpolyphenolic constituents of olive oil against in vitro low - density lipoprotein oxidation . J . Med . Food 1 : 1 - 7 . Burns JK , Buker RS , Roka FM ( 2005 ) Mechanical harvesting capacity in sweet orange is increased with an abscission agent . Horttechnology 15 : 758 - 765 . Cao , G . , E . Sofic , and R.L . Prior . 1997 . Antioxidant and prooxidant behavior of flavonoids : Structure - activity relationships . Free Rad . Bio . Med . 22 : 749 - 760 . Kupferman , E . and J . Gutzwiler . 2003 . Use of diphenylamine , ethoxyquin and Semperfresh on Anjou pears . http : / / postharvest.tfrec.wsu.edu / EMK2002G.pdf . Liebler , D.C . , D.S . Kling And D.J . Reed . 1986 . Antioxidant Protection Of Phospholipid Bilayers By A - Tocopherol : control of a - tocopherol status and lipid peroxidation by ascorbic acid and Glutathione . J . Biol . Chem . 261 : 12114 - 12119 . Silva , M.M . , M.R . Santos , G . Caroço , , R . Rocha , G . Justino , and L.Mira . 2002 . Structure - antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids : A Re - examination . Free Rad . Res . 36 : 1219 - 1227 . Smirnoff N 1995 Antioxidant systems and plant response to the environment . In " Environment and Plant Metabolism : Flexibility and Acclimation " ( N Smirnoff ed ) , Bios Scientific , Oxford , pp . 217 - 243 . Wonisch , W . and R.J . Schaur . 2002 . Chemistry of glutathione . In : Significance of Glutathione to Plant Adaptation to the Environment , vol . 2 ( D . Grill , M . Tausz , and L . J . De Kok , eds ) . Springer , 280 p . Yang , B . , A . Kotani , K . Arai , and F . Kusu . 2001 . Estimation of the antioxidant activity of flavanoids from their oxidation potentials . Analy . Sci . 17 : 599 - 604 .