Viewing Document
Title Large-scale releases of pesticide-resistant spider mite predators
File Options PDF | Additional Information
Quick Link Repository View: https://ucanr.edu/repository/a/?a=70697
Direct to File: https://ucanr.edu/repository/a/?get=70697
Abstract Research also showed for the first time that mite predators planted in almond orchards can disperse aerially.

Authors
Barnett, William W. : William W. Barnett is Area Specialist, Cooperative Extension, Fresno County
Bentley, Walter Joseph
Integrated Pest Management Entomologist, Emeritus
Entomology
Cahn, Daniel : Daniel Cahn are Staff Research Associates, U.C., Berkeley
Castro, Darryl : Darryl Castro and Daniel Cahn are Staff Research Associates, U.C., Berkeley
Coviello Mr, Richard L.
Farm Advisor, Emeritus
Entomology, pest management
Hendricks Mr, Lonnie C.
Farm Advisor, Emeritus
Hoy, Marjorie A. : Marjorie A. Hoy is Associate Professor and Entomologist, Department of Entomological Sciences, University of California, Berkeley
Reil, Wilbur O. : Wilbur O. Reil is Staff Research Associate, U.C., Davis
Publication Date Jan 1, 1982
Date Added Jun 26, 2009
Copyright © The Regents of the University of California
Copyright Year 1982
Description

Success in mass-rearing and releasing genetically improved predators in almond orchards brings full-scale implementation nearer.

OCR Text
Large - scale releases of pesticide - resistant spider mite predators Marjorie A . Hoy 0 William W . Barnett Wilbur 0 . Reil Darryl Castro 0 Daniel Cahn 0 Richard Coviello 0 Walter J . Bentley Lonnie C . Hendricks Research also showedfor thefirst time that mitepredators â?? planted â?쳌 in almond orchards can disperse aerially . son ; document their ability to overwinter ; the greenhouse system , but large numbers of Spider mites can be seriouspests in Califor - and determine if pesticide rates can be re - predators were not available for release until nia almond orchards . In some orchards , the duced to manage spider mites and predators . early August . The soybeans were planted Metaseiulus ( = Typhlodromus ) occi - mite April This report describes our progress in rearing 27 , and 31 flats of spider mites and car - dentalis ( Nesbitt ) is an effective predator of the Pacific and two - spotted spider mites , large numbers of the resistant predators , their baryl - OP - resistant predators were added on Tetranychus pacrfcus McGregor and T . ur - a previously unknown M . oc - establishment , and four occasions in June . Total input of cidentalis ticae Koch , respectively . Pesticides used to phenomenon - large - scale aerial dispersal of was estimated to be 180,000 M . occidentalis from an almond orchard . control the navel orangeworm , AmyeIois females . By August , the plants were about 4 feet tall transitella ( Walker ) , and the peach twig Predator rearing and could be harvested . Leaf samples taken Anarsia lineatella Zell . , can disrupt borer , on August 6 indicated that the half - acre plot this biological control , however . Carbaryl Two systems were developed to produce 32 million M . oc - contained approximately ( Sevin ) and the new pyrethroid permethrin predators . Most of the 1.5 million M . occi - cidentalis females , plus at least another 30 ( Ambush or Pounce ) can causeseriousspider dentalis females released in almond orchards million immatures and males . Each soybean mite outbreaks by killing spider mite preda - during 1981were reared on pinto beans , Pha - 300 predator plant contained an average of tors , including M . occidentalis , by stimu - seolus vulgaris ( L ) , in a University of Califor - females . lating spider mite reproduction , or by causing nia , Berkeley , greenhouse . Plants were This method was the least expensive in pro - dispersal of spider mites , which also can en - grown in flats containing one - half U.C . soil ducing large quantities of predators in in - hance their reproduction . mix and one - half vermiculite . In the initial oculative releases during August or Septem - M . occidentalis has been selected in the phase of greenhouseproduction ( February to ber for largeacreages . Control of spidermites laboratory for resistance to carbaryl and to May ) T . urticae were added to the bean plants cannot be expected during the field season of permethrin ( CaliforniaAgriculture , January as soon as dicotyledon leaves appeared . release with these late releases . However , this 1980 and November - December 1980 ) as part About one week later , resistant M . occiden - procedure should be helpful in establishing a of a genetic improvement project . The two talis were added . Plants were treated with population that will be effectivethe following strains , which are also resistant to organo - carbaryl or permethrin periodically to ensure year . phosphorus insecticides , such as Guthion that the predator colonies remained resistant ( azinphosmethyl ) , diazinon , and Imidan and that nonresistant predators were re - Predator releases moved . Each strain was maintained on ( phosmet ) , are called carbaryl - OP and per - methrin - OP resistant . These strains have separate benches in the greenhouse . In all cases , both predator strains were been evaluatedin the laboratory , greenhouse , Low rates of acaricide ( Omite 30 WP , ! h released in the orchard after the relevant and small field plots to determinetheir ability to Yi pound per 100 gallons water ) were ap - so that native insecticide had been applied to become established , control spider mites , plied when predator - prey densities became ( susceptible ) predators were largely elimi - overwinter in orchards , and survivecommer - nated . Pinto bean plants were cut and placed 40 to 50 imbalanced ( usually more than cial pesticide applications . spidermites of all stagesto 1predator ) . After in the crotch of the tree . Releasepatterns and of genetic improvement of The concept the predator - prey system stabilized in May , numbers released varied from orchard to or - biological control agents previously received chard ( see table ) , but most often 350females predators were multiplied by cutting old little support because of concerns that labor - plants containing both spider mites and were placed in every third tree , in every third M . atory - selected natural enemies might not be occidentalisand placing them on clean young row . Unknown numbers of males and imma - as effectiveas unselected â?? wild â?쳌 strains . Be - tures were released as well . bean flats . These divisions yielded three new cause our previous field plots were small and We expected establishment in the tree and flats everytwo to three weeks during the sum - not always managed â?? normally â?쳌 by the mer . Continuous production of predators spread from release trees to adjacent nonre - grower , we conducted research on the feasi - lease trees sometimeduring the 1981field sea - from June to September was possible , and bility of large - scale field releases of pesticide - about one million carbaryl - OP - resistant son . Releases were made throughout the resistant strains of predators for spider mite 227,000 permethrin - predator females and summer when adequate prey were available OP - resistant females were released . control . Goals were to rear resistant M . oc - a minimal to support the predators ; that is , cidentalis and release them in San Joaquin Predators also were reared outdoors in a prey level of one - half to one spider mite of half - acre soybean plot in the San Joaquin Valley commercial almond orchards ; docu - any stage per leaf . Black cotton cloth bands Valley . This method required less labor than ment their establishmentduring the first sea - were stapled to major scaffolding limbs of 8 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE , JANUARY - FEBRUARY 1982 release and nonrelease trees in all orchards during September . Overwinteringfemalepre - dators recovered from the bands during De - cember and January will be tested in the laboratory to determine if they are resistant and well distributed in the release orchards . Spider mite populations were managed by using low rates of Omite ( Yi , 1 , or 2 pounds 30WPper acre ) or Plictran ( Yi or 1 pound per acre ) both before and after predators were re - leased . Use of these low rates sometimes gave poorer spider mite control than desirable if M . occidentalis were not ade - populations of quate or well distributed in the orchard . Weather , population densities , and irrigation schedulesare also important in determiningif these low rates give satisfactory control . If the weather is extremelyhot , spidermite web - bing has built up , or the orchard is water stressed , low rates of Omite or Plictran may Above : Mite predators not control spider mites sufficiently to pre - were released In or - chard at rlght but not vent foliage damage . Thus , although low in defoliated trees . of these selective acaricides are poten - rates tially useful in spider mite management , con - siderable experience and monitoring are re - quired to prevent excessive damage from spi - der mites . We will continue to evaluate such use of 1982 , because low rates can acaricides during prevent predator - prey imbalances resulting of food , reduce grower from temporary loss Left : Spider mitewebs costs , and retard development of resistance indicate severe dam - to these chemicals . Selection for dominant age in almond trees . resistancegenes will be slower in nativespider mite populations if acaricides are used infre - Below : Researchers quently and at low rates . Plictran resistance check soybean nur - sery fieldwhere 62mil . has been found recently in spider mites in llon predators were Oregon pear orchards ( P . H . Westigard , rearedfor releaseinal - personal communication ) and serves as a mond orchards . warning of the potentiallylimitedlife span of these acaricides in California . Aerial dispersal We suspected that carbaryl - OP - resistant M . occidental & dispersed aerially in the Bidart almond orchard near Bakersfield dur - ing 1979 - 80 . A few predators had been re - 1979at one end of the block , leased in August and by August 1980 the carbaryl - OP - resist - ant predators were present throughout the l ) , which indi - block in large numbers ( fig . cated they had established , spread , and sur - vived a carbaryl application in July 1980 . An additional sample and laboratory test with carbaryl in April 1981 showed that the resis - tant strain had survived a second winter . so widely distri - Because the predators were buted over at least 50 acres , aerial dispersal was suspected . 1981 , we conducted an experimentto de - In termine if our suspicion was justified . Car - baryl - OP - resistant M.occidentalis were re - on June 9 into every third tree , every leased CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE , JANUARY - FEBRUARY 1982 9 Almndr corboryl - OP resistant sistant predators will disperse from the 01 " release sites , - 1981 or how to manage the resistance . Almonds o - 1980 in the orchards or vineyards to which the re - field crop3 sistant M . occidentatis disperse . permethrin - OP resistant 210 During 1980 and 1981 , we inoculated 1 A A A A - 1981 and 86 acres of almonds in the San Joaquin N A A - A - 1980 Valley with the carbaryl - OP - and permeth - t \ \ 2 ) . rin - OP - resistant strains , respectively ( fig . I u \ It will be interesting to learn whether these in * ' \ orchards will serve as foci for the spread of Almonds carbaryl resistance ( determined by a single major semidominant gene ) into other orchards or vineyards . ( Spread of the per - methrin - OP - resistant strain is not expected , because permethrin resistance is determined by several genes . If this strain interbreeds ex - tensively with permethrin - susceptible wild Fig . 2 . Dispersal of two resistant Fig . 1 . Carbaryl - OP - resistant M . occidentalis predators , the resistance is lost . ) Only careful M . occidentalis strains from almond were released in 80 - acreorchard , 1979 . Resis - monitoring of the area around these release orchards where releases were made tant predators were recovered in 1980 and sites can resolve our questions . It is clear for in 1980 and 1981 . 1981 , indicating extensive movement . the first time , however , that M . occidentalis can disperse through the air . The relative im - third row , in an almond orchard ( Livingston - Six plastic panels , 9 by 12 inches , were levee . I in table ) . Carbaryl had been applied in May portance of this method of dispersal remains coated with high vacuum grease ( Dow Corn - and again on July 3 . Despiteapplications of 2 ing ) and attached at three levels on the tower . to be resolved . pounds 30 WP'Omite per acre on July 3 and After removal from the orchard , the panels 21 , spider mites increased and caused sub - were scanned with a dissecting microscope , Marjorie A . Hoy is Associate Professor and Entomologist , Department of Entomological stantial foliage damage and some defoliation and spider mite and predator numbers were Sciences , University of California , Berkeley ; because populations were high when the estimated by counting one - ninth of the panel William W.Barnett isArea Specialist , Cooperative acaricide was applied . The abundant spider Extension , Fresno County ; Wilbur slide - 0 . Reil is Staff area . Predators from the panels were Research Associate , U.C . , Davis ; Darryl Castro mites also provided unlimited food for the mounted and identified to species ; all were and Daniel Cahn are Staff Research Associates , predators , which multiplied extensively . M . occidentalis females . No immatures or U , C , , Berkeley ; Lonnie C . Hendricks , Richard J . Bentley are FarmAdvisors , Coviello , and Walter As foliage quality declined , spider mites males were recovered on the panels . CooperativeExtension , Merced , Fresno , and Kern M . occidentalis in the Aerial dispersal of T . urticae and T . pacifcus ( predominantly counties , respectively . We thank K . Casanave , E . field has not been documented previously . females ) began to disperse from the orchard Serber , D . Ravetto , T . Browne , and R . Griggfor assistance . This project is supported in part by The dispersal raises interesting questions in July . Dispersal was detected by trapping fundsfrom the Almond Board of California , IPM about the fate of the resistant strains we have the mites on sticky panels situated on two Program of the CaliforniaDepartment of Food released . We know how to establish resistant towers placed at the east end ( downwind of and Agriculture , and Experiment Station Project 3522 - H . We are especially grateful to the growers predators in specific orchards after the rele - prevailing winds ) of the orchard on July 31 . who made their orchards available : Bidart Farms , 25 feet vant pesticidehas been applied . However , we The 11 - foot - high towers were about Blackwell Land Company , C.V . Horton , A . Bet - tencourt , Sumner - PeckRanch , and H . Deniz . from the edge of the orchard on a 2 - foot don't know how rapidly or how far these re - 10 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE , JANUARY - FEBRUARY1982
Posted By