Viewing Document
Title Monitoring aphid infestations on broccoli
File Options PDF | Additional Information
Quick Link Repository View: https://ucanr.edu/repository/a/?a=70780
Direct to File: https://ucanr.edu/repository/a/?get=70780
Abstract Samples from throughout the field provide the best picture of aphid density, but those from field borders give earliest notice of aphid migrations.
Authors
Carson, William
Staff Research Associate
Pest management on vegetable crops
Nakakihara, Henry : Henry Nakakihara is Staff Research Associate, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, Calif.
Trumble, John T
Distinguished Professor
Plant compensation for insect herbivory; impact of air and heavy metal pollution on plant-insect interactions; biological and microbial control in sustainable agriculture; chemical ecology; participate on the celery and tomato guidelines
Publication Date Nov 1, 1982
Date Added Jun 26, 2009
Copyright © The Regents of the University of California
Copyright Year 1982
OCR Text
Monitorina anhid infestations on broccoli John T . Trumble 0 Henry Nakakihara 0 William Carson A p h i ds cause substantial economic losses property at the University of California , suitable feeding sites . Transmission takes to Californiaâ??s broccoli industry in three Riverside . At least 60 plants in each crop , place when virus particles adhering to the which were selected using a stratified ran - ways : by inserting their hollow beaks into or contained in the salivary mouthparts plant tissues and removing sap , by transmit - dom design , were monitored for aphids and glands are injected during feeding . Thus , a ting viruses , and by contaminating the mar - parasites each week between thinning and single green peach aphid can infect many keted product . Since California produces 95 head formation . Counts from the youngest , plants . of the broccoli grown in the United percent highest , and oldest leaves were recorded Throughout most of California , the green States , costs of pesticides , application equip - so that separately from entire - plant counts peach aphid produces a sexual generation in ment , and the labor associated with aphid locational preferences could be determined . the fall , and females lay eggs that overwinter control cause considerable loss of income . on peach trees . In the spring , winged adults Green peach aphid Aphid feeding often results in stunting , leave the peach trees and migrate to a variety of weed and vegetable hosts , including broc - curling , or yellowing of broccoli ; severeinfes - The green peach aphid , Myzus persicae tations may kill plants . Leaves distorted by coli . Offspring from these adults reproduce ( Sulzer ) , was the most common speciesin this aphid feeding or virus infection provide areas parthenogenetically ( nonsexually ) , so that study ( fig . 1 ) . These aphids are pale green to populations may expand quickly . In warmer sheltered from pesticides , and survivors can yellow , and the winged form ( alate ) has an ir - areas like southern California , parthenogen - immediately reinfest the plants . regular black pattern on the upperside of the etic reproduction may occur throughout the Once broccoli heads begin to form , some abdomen . Some plant damage occurred year without need for a sexual generation . aphid species migrate to and thus contamin - when populations reached extremely high ate the marketable portions . Pesticidal sup - levels , but green peach aphids were primarily Cabbage aphid pression of established populations is nearly a problem because of their ability to transmit impossible when aphids are shielded by the viruses . Cabbage aphids , Brevicoryne brmsicae tight , umbrella - shaped flower buds . Unfor - Winged females transmit viruses during ( L . ) , were easily distinguished from green tunately , biological control agents , such as migrations , moving rapidly from one poten - of their gray color and peach aphids because hover flies ( Syrphidae ) and parasites , follow tial host to the next , probing each in search of white waxlike covering . These aphids were their hosts into the heads and cause addi - gregarious , occasionallygathering in colonies tional contamination . Although washing the of several thousand . Such large groups were crop after harvest may reduce losses from quite destructive , often stunting the plants = Green peach aphid contamination , parasitized aphids , or and seriously reducing yields . Cabbaae aDhid â?? mummies , â?쳌 are often firmly attached to the In the cool northern regions of California , plant , so that repeated rinsings are required cabbage aphids overwinter in the egg stageon to dislodge them . Since much of the fresh Brassica . crop debris or weeds in the genus market broccoligrown in California is packed However , warm winters in southern Califor - for shipment in the field and cannot be read - nia permit parthenogenetic reproduction all ily cleaned , pesticidesare used to maintain an year , and 15 to 20 generations may be pro - insect - free crop . duced annually . Cabbage aphids are more The objectives of the study reported here tolerant of cold weather than the other aphid were to determine which aphid species are species attacking broccoli ; infestations gen - economically important and to document erally occur in the winter in southern Cali - when and where each occurs on the plant . fornia and in the spring and fall in northern Based on this information , an efficient , reli - California . able sampling plan could be developed . We Although they did not reach population densities as high as those collected the experimental data in 1980 - 81 of green peach of greater from three successive 0.4 - hectare ( 1 - acre ) aphids , cabbage aphids were Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter economic importance as a contaminant of plantings of â?? De Cicco â?? broccoli at the Uni - Coastal region interior Valley broccoli . Approximately 20 percent of the versity of Californiaâ??s South Coast Field 1 . Occurrence of primary aphid species Fig . harvested broccoli was contaminated in the Station in Santa Ana , and two successive in valley and coastal on broccoli grown fall and winter plantings , and cabbage aphids plantings at the Agricultural Operations areas of California . CALI1 - ORNIAAGRICULTURE , NOVEMBER - DECEMBER1982 15 These preferences appeared to be in response to nitrogen availability in the plants . The youngest and highest leaves near the apical meristem were rapidly growing and served as nitrogen â?? sinks . â?쳌 As the oldest leaves began to senesce , the nitrogen - containing com - pounds released by cellular breakdown were transported out of the leaves for use else - where in the plant , and substantial amounts of amino acidsand nitrogen became available in a form suitable for aphids and other sap - Biological control agents , such feeding insects . The other aphid species were as syrphid larva shown attack - usually found on the intermediate leaves , may ing cabbage aphid colony , unless one of the high - nitrogen niches was cause additional contamination of broccoli heads . available . Earlier in the season , when plant height averaged less than 10 cm ( 4 inches ) physiological differences between the leaves were minor and within - plant distributions of aphid species were not as well defined . Based on this information , early - season monitoring should includeaphid counts from Green peach aphid , shown entire plants . Once plants reach about 10cm , above right in parasitized state , sampling for the cabbage aphid is most effi - is a problem mostly because it transmits virus diseases . cient when only the youngest and highest leaves are sampled . The green peach aphid Parasitized cabbage aphids are can be effectively monitored by checkingjust so firmly attached to the often the underside of the oldest leaf . Researchers plant that repeated rinsings are in both England and the United States have required to dislodge them . demonstrated an â?? edge effect â?쳌 for aphid infestations ; borders of fields tend to have larger populations . Therefore , presence - or - accounted for over 90 percent of the insects most common aphids encountered that did absence sampling should concentrate on observed . Because cabbage aphids tend to not accept broccoli as a host . Therefore , we move from the youngest leaves into the broc - these areas to minimize sampling time and did not investigate the occurrence , distribu - maximize efficiency . This type coli heads , they must be controlled before of sampling is tion , and potential for virus transmission by heading to ensure a marketable crop . particularly important before heads begin to these visitors . form , since aphids must be controlled at this Other aphid species Distribution and sampling time if a marketable crop is to be produced . The turnip aphid , Hyadaphis erysimi Previous research at U.C . , Riverside , has Approximately two weeks after broccoli shown that , in the absence of viruses , broc - ( Kaltenbach ) , and the potato aphid , Macro - thinning , the aphid speciesbegan to segregate siphum euphorbiae ( Thomas ) , were occa - coli plants can tolerate at least 100aphids per by location on the plants . Cabbage aphids sionally found at low population levels but plant without significantyield loss . However , preferred the youngest and highest leaves ; were not considered to be of major impor - if viruses are prevalent , economic losses can green peach aphids were most common on tance . Turnip aphids are generally yellow or occur at much lower population levels , and the undersides of the oldest leaves ( fig . 2 ) . green , with black heads . Although similar in pesticideapplication may be required sooner . appearance to cabbage aphids , they could be Since aphid populations were often distrib - readily distinguishedby the absence of a wax - uted in clumps in the field , counts from just a like coating . The red biotype of the potato few plants were not effective for determining Youngest leaves o , 50 . aphid was the dominant form during fall and the extent of an infestation . Samples collec - - Highest leaves g5 early winter plantings , which greatly facili - ted throughout the field provided the best 111111 Oldest leaves c 5 0.40 . tated identification and separation of species . statistical picture of aphid density , but sam - 2 - - 0 Throughout the remainder of the study the pling from field borders ( especially those 2 u0.30 . green biotype predominated . The relatively downwind of fences or windbreaks ) pro - long cornicles ( tubular structures projecting duced more conservative estimates and pro - upward or backward from the rear of the ab - vided the earliest notice of aphid migrations . domen ) and legs , as well as the extended an - tennal tubercles ( protrusions on the head to John 7 : Trumble is Assistant Professor of Ento - which the antennae are attached ) , aided in mology , Henry Nakakihara is Staff Research distinguishingthis species . Associate , and William Carson is Laboratory Assistant , Department of Entomology , University Winged forms of Macrosiphum ambrosiae of Calsfornia , Riverside , Calif . All photos by Max ( Thomas ) , Aphis spiraecola Patch , and Fig . 2 . Niche separation by green peach and Badgley , Department of Entomology , U.C . , River - Schizaphis graminum ( Rondani ) were the cabbage aphids based on plant development . side . 16 CALIFORNIAAGRICULTURE , NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 1982
Posted By