Viewing Document
Title Genetic disease resistance
File Options PDF | Additional Information
Quick Link Repository View: https://ucanr.edu/repository/a/?a=72284
Direct to File: https://ucanr.edu/repository/a/?get=72284
Abstract Not available – first paragraph follows:

The most widely used plant disease control method has been the incorporation of single, usually dominant, genes for disease resistance into cultivated plants. In some cases, disease control also has been accomplished by withdrawal from plants of certain dominant alleles conferring vulnerability to attack by pathogens that produce specific toxins. By either approach, genetic resistance affords the only practical control strategy in most major crops.

Authors
Gilchrist, David G
Professor   Plant Pathologist-AES
Genetics and physiology of host-pathogen interaction, diseases of agronomic crops
Keen, Noel T. : Noel T. Keen, Professor, Plant Pathology, U.C., Riverside.
Publication Date Aug 1, 1982
Date Added Jul 17, 2009
Copyright © The Regents of the University of California
Copyright Year 1982
OCR Text
D . W . Rains examines a culture plate containing alfalfa cells growing on a high - salt medium in â?? cell city , â?쳌 where billions of cells are grown and selected for salt tolerance under light - and temperature - controlled conditions . development of recombinant DNA tech - salt . This selected line additionally displays of genetically niques opens the possibility other characteristicssuggestingthat the toler - engineering plants by introducing desired di - a true halo - ance results from a shift toward sease resistance genes from both intraspecific phytic nature . Besides tolerating high salts , and intergenic sources . Such techniques Genetic disease as evi - halophytes actually require some salt , would be immediatelyapplicableto thesetwo denced by poor growth in its absence and resistance problems and would also increase under - growth stimulation when salt is added . standing of the mechanisms of natural di - The capacity of a cell culture to regenerate David G . Gilchrist sease resistance and nonhost immunity . plants usually diminishes over time . This The major limitationto direct implementa - in cell selection pro - presents difficulties Noel T . Keen tion of this technology is that no single resis - grams , because , by the time the selection and tance mechanism has been characterized testing stages are completed , the selectedcells T h e most widely used plant disease control completely , nor have the interactive gene may fail to respond to standard regeneration method has been the incorporation of single , products been identified . Extensive physio - conditions . This was indeed the case with our usually dominant , genes for disease resis - logical information indicates that resistance 200 media alfalfa cell line . By testing some fall into two general classes , in - tance into cultivated plants . In some cases ; phenomena modifications , we developed a sequence of disease control also has been accomplished ducible and constitutive . media that enabled us to regenerate plants In the former case , resistant plant geno - by withdrawal from plants of certain domi - from the salt - tolerant cultures . The regener - types appear to recognize some feature of the nant alleles conferring vulnerability to attack ated plants could then be tested to determine invadingpathogen , which then initiatesan in - by pathogens that produce specifictoxins . By whether the salt tolerance of the cells in cul - either approach , genetic resistance affords duced defense response . This is typified by ture was carried through to the whole plant . hypersensitive necrosis.of plant cells at the the only practical control strategy in most Unfortunately , in our case , the regenerated infection site and is associated with the ac - major crops . plants were very weak and we were not able cumulation of antibiotic chemicals called Two current problemswith the use of resis - to demonstrate any increase in salt tolerance . ( 1 ) they are frequently over - phytoalexins . Recent evidence from Univer - tance genes are : Our evidence , and that from other laborator - come by new forms of the pathogen , which of California , Riverside , is consistent sity ies , indicates that our approach is sound , with the hypothesis that recognition involves appear to evolve from the original pathogen however , and we are confident that con - population by either genetic recombination resistancegene products in the form of recep - tinued efforts will produce salt - tolerant crop or mutation ; tor moleculesthat interact with specific com - ( 2 ) suitable genes conferring plants that transmit this valuabletrait to their plex cell surface carbohydrates ( elicitors ) of disease resistance often are not availablein a progeny . or genus , or they cannot be incor - the invading pathogen . The exact nature of plant species D . William Rains , Professor , Agronomy and porated into agronomically useful cultivars the pathogen genes that may determine this Range Science , and Director , Plant Growth La - boratory , U.C . , Davis . because of cross - fertility barriers . Recent unique carbohydrate structure is unknown , CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE , AUGUST 1982 31 Enhancing nitrogen fixation Donald A . Phillips Larry E . Williams Eoduction of ammonia from atmospheric nitrogen by the Rhizobium - legumesymbiosis Lesions on tomato leaves and fruit offers opportunities for geneticimprovement caused by disease - determining toxins produced by the pathogen of both Rhizobium bacteria and host legume . A . alternata following infection of Root nodules formed by rhizobia are the or - plant . This disease was important gans responsible for nitrogen fixation . Cali - fresh - market tomato in - to the fornia crops that might benefit most directly dustry in San Diego and Ventura from such improvements are alfalfa , clover , 1960s to counties from the early Inheritance of a singlegene - the late 1970s . It is now controlled common beans , lima beans , garbanzos , and determined sensitivity to host - in these areas by genetic resis - blackeye peas . Additional nitrogen fixed , but Alter - selective toxins produced by tance in what may have been the not used , by those plants would be bound in naria alternata f . sp . lycopersici , a first cloning of a gene for disease an organic form that could carry over to ben - fungal pathogen specific to resistance . tomato . Segregation in F , genera - efit subsequent crops . tion fits ratio of l resistant : 2 Recent genetic information indicates that intermediate : 1 susceptible plant leguminous plants vary in their capacity to from the original cross of homozy - use soilnitrogenand to fix atmosphericnitro - inhibition by the toxin than that from the sus - gous - resistant by homozygous - susceptible parental ( P , ) plants . gen with Rhizobium . Our understanding of ceptiblegenotype . Other host - selectivetoxins how efficiently nitrogen is fixed by common have been hypothesized to interfere with varieties of legumes grown in California is membrane integrity , although the exact limited , but significant work in this area is mechanism is unresolved . Clearly , cloning of being done by L . R . Teuber and K . W . Foster specific alleles lacking sensitivity to toxins at Davis . Genotypic variation for protein but : pecific glycosyl transferase enzymes are from the same or unrelated speciesand intro - concentration in alfalfa grown sequentially known to be involved in cell surface carbohy - ducing the cloned DNA into the cultivated on atmospheric nitrogen and ammonium ni - drate synthesis . Attempts to molecularly plant is a goal , along with establishinga valu - trate has been measured , and over 700 geno - clone the primary disease - determining genes able information base on resistance gene types of large - seeded grain legumes are being of certain plant pathogens , especially bac - products . assessed in the field for their capacity to use teria , are in progress in laboratories at U.C . , As assay systems for resistancegenes have atmospheric and soil nitrogen . Such studies Berkeley , Davis , and Riverside . If such genes become available at the level of gene action , will provide the information required to pro - can be cloned and their gene products more more laboratories are attempting to identify duce the next generation of nitrogen - efficient readily isolated , it will be possible to perform and clone disease resistance genes and are legumes for California . experiments to elucidate the molecular func - searching for suitable vehicles to introduce More immediate benefits will be reaped tion of such genes and to isolatethe predicted this DNA into desired plants . Although for - from genetic studies of the bacterial partner , resistance gene - coded receptors produced by eign DNA has been experimentally intro - Rhizobium . Laboratories at Davis are inves - the host plant . duced into plant cells using the crown gall Ti Other bases of resistanceappear to be con - tigating hydrogen uptake , a process affecting plasmid , we are not aware of the successful stitutive and , depending on the form of gene efficiency of nitrogen fixation ( see article by introduction of defined plant genesinto other expression , may involve the presence or R . C . Valentine in this issue ) , and D . N . plant cells by recombinant DNA technology . absence of host - plant sensitivity to chemical Munns at Davis is examining Rhizobium We predict , however , that this will happen disease determinants produced by the patho - strains for natural variation in tolerance to within the next few years . Disease resistance gen . In several diseases , alleles at a single acid and aluminum stress . Collaborative genes are indeed likely to be among the first genetic locus in the host control both suscep - work between the John Innes Institute in genes introduced into new plants by genetic tibility to the pathogen and sensitivity to Norwich , U.K . and our group in Davis has engineering , not only because of their consid - host - selectivetoxins produced by the patho - used conjugal plasmid transfer to produce erable economic importance , but because gen . Such toxins are useful as direct chemical Rhizobium strains significantly superior to they represent some of the few examples in probes of the genetic interaction . Recent either parent . The key plasmid , pIJ1008 , car - plants of naturally occurring and defined work at U.C . , Davis , with such a host - para - ries determinants for hydrogen uptake , single genes with definitive phenotypes . site interaction ( see photos ) indicates that the which are not found in Rhizobium strains Thus , their transfer can be detected easily and host - selective toxin inhibits a key enzyme in that nodulate alfalfa and clover . Although rapidly . the pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway , aspar - pIJ1008 is expressed most completely in pea David G . Gilchrist , Associate Professor , Plant tate transcarbamylase ; the enzyme from the rhizobia , it has been transferred to closely re - 7 : Keen , Pro - Pathology , U.C . , Davis , and Noel resistantgenotype is relativelyless sensitiveto fessor , Plant Pathology , U.C . , Riverside . lated clover and alfalfa bacteria , and those 32 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE , AUGUST 1982
Posted By