Menu Dev Test!
University of California
Dev Test!

Calag Archive

Calag Archive

California citrus acreage response to income tax reform

California Agriculture > Volume 35 > Number 3  > research article 

< Previous | Table of Contents | Next >

< Previous | Table of Contents | Next >

Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article
Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article

Authors

Hoy F. Carman , University of California, Davis

Publication Information

California Agriculture 35(3):4-4.

Published March 01, 1981

PDF  |  Citation  |  Permissions

Author Affiliations show

Abstract

Federal tax reform requiring capitalization of citrus grove development costs significantly reduced new plantings and total acreage.

Full text

Full text is available in PDF.

Author notes

Research on which this article is based was financed by the Economics and Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, as part of its Structure of Agriculture Project.

California citrus acreage response to income tax reform

Hoy F. Carman
University
of
California
Division of Agriculture
and
Natural Resources
Site Information Get PDF Reader
sbnum=9471 | pagenum=59758
© 2024 Regents of the University of California Nondiscrimination Statement Accessibility
Webmaster Email: bjnoel@ucanr.edu

California citrus acreage response to income tax reform

California Agriculture > Volume 35 > Number 3  > research article 

< Previous | Table of Contents | Next >

< Previous | Table of Contents | Next >

Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article
Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article

Authors

Hoy F. Carman , University of California, Davis

Publication Information

California Agriculture 35(3):4-4.

Published March 01, 1981

PDF  |  Citation  |  Permissions

Author Affiliations show

Abstract

Federal tax reform requiring capitalization of citrus grove development costs significantly reduced new plantings and total acreage.

Full text

Full text is available in PDF.

Author notes

Research on which this article is based was financed by the Economics and Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, as part of its Structure of Agriculture Project.

University of California, 2801 Second Street, Room 184, Davis, CA, 95618
Email: calag@ucanr.edu | Phone: (530) 750-1223 | Fax: (510) 665-3427
Website: https://calag.ucanr.edu