Happy New Year everybody.

Unfortunately, we start out the year with some concerns. We want to alert growers that early in 2012 we are seeing transplant decline and dieback in various fields in the Watsonville-Salinas production district. As pictured below (Photo 1), this problem can be quite severe and characteristically affects a large percentage of the field. From what we have seen and heard from others, along with samples submitted to the UCCE disease diagnostics lab in Salinas, this decline is widespread and seems to be particularly acute in organic fields.

On closer inspection (Photos 2 and 3 below), the symptoms closely resemble those caused by high salt levels. Margins of the oldest leaves show the initial symptoms and become brown, dry, and burned. As the condition worsens, the entire leaf will wither and die. Eventually all leaves can turn brown and the transplant can actually die (Photo 4 below). Generally the internal crown tissue is sound and intact; however, as the plants continue to decline, some of these crowns turn brown and become discolored.

These transplant decline and death symptoms superficially resemble symptoms caused by Colletotrichum (anthracnose) and Phytophthora (crown and root rot). However, lab tests thus far have failed to recover any pathogen associated with these plants. In addition, the widespread (up to 75%, in some cases) incidence of declining transplants argues against a biotic agent as the cause of this problem. The problem appears to affect all cultivars and is not restricted to any one source of transplants.

What is causing all of this damage? For fields we have investigated, the water EC (electrical conductivity, a measure of salinity) is normal and the soil is not excessively saline and has never exhibited these symptoms before. Again, dieback symptoms are occurring across varieties, across nurseries, and across blocks. There is some indication that damage is more severe in wetter areas.

The exceptionally dry weather of the past five to six weeks may be playing a significant role in this development. The total lack of rain has forced strawberry growers to irrigate often, and in many cases this has been solely through the drip tape. While this amount of water is sufficient for plant needs, we should take into account that the beds are therefore not being leached by the abundant amounts of water that an inch or two of rain can bring all the while that the bands of pre-plant fertilizer amendments are accumulating salts around them and mineralizing into what can be predominantly ammonium forms of nitrogen in cooler soils. High levels of ammonium are associated with toxicity in plants, as are the accumulated salts.

So this leads us to believe that the leaf burn and transplant dieback being seen up and down our district is being caused by an accumulation of ammonium and salts around the roots because of a lack of leaching.

Interestingly, the most severe leaf burn problems have been in organic strawberry fields supplemented with pre-plant fertilizer. This pattern is consistent with what we know about these fertilizers, which are amendments such as blood or feather meal, meaning that they are fully mineralized in a matter of weeks after incorporation. Therefore, fields containing these fertilizers likely right now have significant amounts of ammonium accumulated in addition to the salts concentrated around the roots due to the lack of winter/spring leaching. 

If our hypothesis is correct, growers who have this problem should counteract the buildup of harmful agents by irrigating with overhead sprinklers or at the very least with heavy watering through the drip tape. Overhead irrigation is a good substitute for rain and provides the abundant amounts of free water needed to move the ammonium and salts away from the plant roots where they are causing harm.

There is a stream of thought currently in the Watsonville- Salinas strawberry production district of gaining advantage with earlier plant establishment this year by dramatically reducing the amount of supplemental chill, which is the cold storage of transplants following harvest, for the day neutral varieties ‘San Andreas’ and ‘Monterey’.  This might stem from reports that a number of growers in Santa Maria did well in the 2010-2011 production season with a single day of supplemental chill, and furthermore it is standard for growers in Ventura County to plant ‘San Andreas’ with a single day of chill.  For some then, it does not then seem like too much of a reach that this might be a good strategy for the Watsonville- Salinas production district.

This is worth reviewing because it flies in the face of standard recommendations for these two varieties planted in this area. There are several things going on here that perhaps contributed to the ability of some growers in Santa Maria to produce well last year with a single day of chill.  First, on average last fall, transplants were harvested 10-14 days later than normal and this spring was cooler than usual, meaning a bit lengthier cold conditioning in the nursery field and less plant stress early in the season.  Second, ‘San Andreas’ does seem to be a variety which is affected less by supplemental chill than other varieties, that is to say that it might not need quite as much.

Still, the UC recommendations do not change.  UC Davis plant breeder Doug Shaw, who brought all of these varieties into the world and therefore has an abundance of knowledge regarding them, is not changing his recommendations.   He maintains that one would want to choose transplant harvest about October 18-20 and plant early November, with two weeks supplemental chill. In all cases, plants should be chilled a bare minimum of eight to ten days. 

Never forget that supplemental chill gives the plant vigor to forgive the tough conditions of transplanting.  Planting day neutral varieties in the Watsonville Salinas district with one day of chill to gain advantage of earlier plant establishment is very much like picking up pennies in front of a steamroller.   For a possible small incremental gain, one is risking total disaster.  One day of supplemental chill is NOT recommended for University of California day neutral varieties grown on the Central Coast.

It is at times perhaps tempting to take an uncomplicated view of nutrient deficiency in strawberry.  The mantra goes a little bit like yellow leaves are nitrogen deficient, phosphorous deficiency is given by purple leaves, potassium shortages easily marked by scorched leaves and so on.

I don’t believe any of this is so simple and so attempt to challenge this facile thinking when I have the opportunity to do so.

The following situation was a good one.  A smallish field of ‘Albion’ variety strawberry was not given supplemental fertilizer beyond a standard dose of preplant slow release 18-8-13 in the area of 500 lbs per acre.  The result in late June was as seen below- severely chlorotic plants with a strong tendency towards purpling of the middle age to older leaves.  Additionally, flower production had nearly ceased and fruit was sizing down substantially.

I tested the soil to 6 “down at six different points throughout the field, amalgamated them and got the following results:

Soil pH was a perfectly normal 6.4.  As one can see from the numbers above, plant available nitrogen sources nitrate and ammonium were sort of low (usually want to be 10 ppm for either one), while phosphorous was a quite sufficient 58 ppm.

Tissue samples consisted of leaf blades.  Four separate samples were taken from different sections of the field and each sample consisted of a dozen leaflets of middle age- meaning not the very old ones at the bottom of the plant nor the young tender leaves emerging from the center of the crown. 

Comparing the nitrogen results from the leaf blade with the 2.6-2.8% concentrations described as sufficient as from UC Publication 4098 and Dr. Tim Hartz’s work last year, we see that this vital nutrient is a full percentage point below what is deemed necessary for normal production.  Phosphorous, while below the 0.36% field average taken by Dr. Hartz’s study last year, is still understood to be well above the 0.10 % baseline given by UC Publication 4098.  All other nutrients, with the exception of zinc (15 ppm compared to a recommended 18-20 ppm), in this sample are well within sufficiency ranges.

Why then the pronounced purpling of the leaves if the phosphorous is not dramatically, if at all, insufficient in the tissue?  There are in fact other possibilities.  A lack of nitrogen, which is a component of some amino acids and other compounds, can result in a similar build up of excess carbohydrates as in phosphorous deficiency.   Essentially, both deficiencies have the same result then that these carbohydrates can end up being used in anthocyanin synthesis resulting in accumulation of these flavonoid pigments.  Some are red, others pink and some purple.  This may be an explanation why strawberry leaves lacking in nitrogen but not ostensibly lacking in phosphorous are actually turning red to purple. 

So, while undoubtedly light green to yellow leaves are still a good indication of nitrogen deficiency in strawberry, don't be fooled that the purple that often accompanies it is actually caused by something else like a lack of phosphorous.

Thank you to Soil Control Lab in Watsonville for processing and evaluating these samples.

One of the less well understood issues in our industry on the Central Coast is the phenomenon of yellowing of strawberry plants in certain areas of the district, especially in a number of fields north of Salinas.  The following is meant to share what we have found out on this problem so far, and discuss some of my thoughts about the most probable cause.

While there are many causes of yellowing in strawberry plants, for example lack of nitrogen, iron or zinc, the yellowing of strawberry plants in the Salinas area seems to stem from something else and occurs in the same area, year after year.  In fact, some spots no more than a few meters square give the same symptoms every time strawberries are planted there.  Yet, subsequent plantings of other crops such as broccoli or lettuce do not show any yellowing. 

To address the thought that the yellowing comes from nutritional deficiency, I have taken many samples with colleagues of these yellow plants and never found anything exceptional nutrient wise.  Consider the table below which is an eightfold replicated comparison taken in a large strawberry field south of Castroville with large areas of yellow plants in a field of healthy green plants:

What one immediately sees from the table above is that the trend is actually for yellow plants to have HIGHER levels of essential nutrients than their apparently healthier counterparts. 

Interestingly, manganese is very much higher, and a t-test tells us significantly so, in the yellow plants than in green plants.

So, the assumption that nutrient deficiencies are leading to this yellowing of the plants is not backed by the evidence of a plant tissue test.  To be sure, yellowing from nitrogen tends to be stronger on the outer, older leaves as this mobile nutrient is transported to the younger leaves.  Deficiency of zinc generally has a green halo around the leaf edges.  Perhaps the symptoms are consistent with that of iron deficiency, and indeed the iron from the soil sample from around the plant itself is significantly higher around the green plant than the yellow.  However, the levels of iron in the evaluated plants are well above those described as critical by UC Publication 4098 and Tim Hartz’s strawberry fertility work in 2010.

One of the considerations though all of this research is that the yellowing is caused by waterlogging and a subsequent deficiency in the amount of oxygen available to the plant.  This is not necessarily water or saturation that is easily measurable at the surface and may be deeper down in the bed.  It is also possible that salinity, which has a slight inverse effect on the solubility of oxygen in water, is also playing a role. 

Plants respond to decreased oxygen levels, known as hypoxia, in different ways and some species are in fact quite sensitive to this condition.  Roots, as the plant organ which face the hypoxic condition in a waterlogged soil, respond to this stress by switching from respiration to a fermentative metabolism which in turn increases the demand for carbohydrates.   That this metabolic change in strawberry is the cause of the yellowing in our strawberries is something which yet remains to be explored.

As a final thought, consider the the fourth picture below in which the drip tape on the right was clogged and less water delivered to that bed for several weeks.  The result was a lessening in the yellowing of the plants in that bed, and only that bed.  Absolutely, this is not a very scientific evaluation, but it does strongly suggest that excessive water from the plant's perspective has something to do the yellowing we know from around Salinas.