- Author: Karey Windbiel-Rojas
- Editor: Lauren Fordyce
Invasive pest species threaten California's natural environment and can have an impact on public health. Help spread the word about these invasive species and how to limit their introduction, spread, and harm. Learn to recognize these pests and distinguish them from look-alikes. If you suspect you have found any of these species, contact your local County Agricultural Commissioner or report it to the CDFA Report a Pest Hotline.
Emerald Ash Borer
The emerald ash borer (or EAB) is an invasive insect that has been found for years in numerous states across the country, but until recently had not been found on the West Coast. In June 2022, EAB was detected in Oregon. This insect feeds on all species of ash trees and has the potential to devastate whole communities of trees.
See the California Department of Food and Agriculture website for information about its biology and national distribution.
Spotted Lanternfly
In California, we've been on the lookout for the spotted lanternfly (SLF) for several years. In July 2022, a truck carrying firewood into California from New Jersey (silly, I know!) was inspected at a CDFA Border Inspection Station in Truckee and the wood was found to be carrying egg masses of SLF. The wood was destroyed but this is a significant detection.
Understand the danger of moving firewood from place to place within the state and especially across state borders. Firewood can harbor many types of invasive pests including SLF but also invasive shothole borers, gold-spotted oak borers, and other very hard to see invasive insects AND diseases.
Jumping worm/crazy worm
The invasive jumping worm (Amynthas agrestis) has many common names: Alabama jumpers, Jersey wrigglers, wood eel, crazy worms, snake worms, Asian jumping worm, and crazy snake worms. The jumping worm has been found in Napa and Sonoma Counties. It is similar-looking to the common earthworm but thrashes wildly and is said to jump as much as 1 foot off the ground.
Like other earthworms, jumping worms eat fallen leaves and other natural material on the ground. However, these worms are voracious eaters. They eat so much of the soil “litter” layer that they nearly clear the top soil of all life. Many plants can't grow or spread without this layer of leaf litter, plus this disrupts the ecosystem of the leaf litter.
Read more about this worm in this article by Oregon State University. UC IPM is compiling information about the worm and where it has been found in California and will publish and announce this information once finished.
Stay Informed
There are many other invasive species in California being monitored for state agencies and many others receiving management efforts. Be sure you are subscribed to the UC IPM Home & Garden Pest Newsletter and social media platforms (@ucipmurban) to ensure you are receiving timely updates and news.
Other useful resources for these invasive pests and many others:
UC IPM Invasive and Exotic Pests web page
Center for Invasive Species Research at UC Riverside
Urban & Community IPM webinars https://ucanr.edu/sites/ucipm-community-webinars/
CDFA target pest web page https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/PDEP/target_pests.html
- Author: Kathy Keatley Garvey

A first-generation college student, Rajarapu holds two biochemistry degrees from Osmania University, India: her bachelor's degree (2006) and her master's degree (2008). She obtained her doctorate in entomology in 2013 from The Ohio State University, working with Professors Daniel Herms and Larry Phelan. Her dissertation: "Integrated Omics on the Physiology of Emerald Ash Borer."
Spring Seminar Schedule
Here's the seminar line-up for the spring quarter. All are scheduled from 4:10 to 5 p.m. on Wednesdays.
April 21
Chris Hamilton
University of Idaho, Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology
Title: "Understanding Aphonopelma Diversity Across the Madrean Pine-Oak Woodlands Hotspot by Integrating Western Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK)"
Host: Jason Bond
Zoom info
April 28
Ellen Currano
University of Wyoming, Department of Geology and Geophysics
Title: "Ancient Bug-Bitten Leaves Reveal the Impacts of Climate and Plant Nutrients on Insect Herbivores"
Host: Emily Meineke
Zoom info
May 5
Gabe Zilnik
USDA-ARS Wapato, Wash., Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Research
Title: "Improving Tobacco IPM with Machine Learning"
Host: Madi Hendrick
Zoom info
May 12
Margarita López-Uribe
Pennsylvania State University, Department of Entomology
Title: "Ecoevolutionary Consequences of Crop Domestication on Plant-Pollinator Interactions"
Host: Rachel Vannette
Zoom info
May 19
Manuela Ramalho
Cornell University
Title: "Exploring Connections Among Microbial Community, Ecology and Phylogenetic History of Ants"
Host: Marshal McMunn
Zoom info
May 26
Javier Ceja Navarro
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Biological Systems and Engineering
Title: (Pending)
Host: Rachel Vannette
Zoom info
June 2
Alexandra Harmon-Threatt
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of Entomology
Title: (Pending)
Host: Neal Williams
Zoom info
For any questions, email Ian Grettenberger (imgrettenberger@ucdavis.edu).

- Author: Kathy Keatley Garvey
Those catchy words headlined a recent notice of a congressional briefing.
What does coffee, wine and baseball bats have to do with integrated pest management (IPM), you ask?
Well, insects can wreak havoc on the coffee, wine and forestry industries. Consider these invasive species:
- the coffee berry borer, native to Africa, is a pest impacting the coffee industry
- the European grapevine moth, native to southern Italy, targets grapevines
- the emerald ash borer, native to Eastern Russia, Northern China, Japan, and Korea, is a forestry pest.
So there you have it: coffee, wine and baseball bats.
IPM specialist Frank Zalom, distinguished professor, UC Davis Department of Entomology and Nematology and a past president of the Entomological Society of America, played a key role in that U.S. Congressional briefing, held last month in the Rayburn House Office Building.
A newly authored bill by Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) and Rep. Ted Yoho (R-Florida) seeks a broader expansion of AIPM and a broader invasive species policy. The bill, the Areawide Integrated Pest Management (AIPM) Act of 2018 (H.R. 5411), would amend the Agricultural Research, Extension and Education Reform Act of 1998 with respect to enabling competitive grants for certain areawide integrated pest management projects, and for other purposes.
Zalom moderated the panel and delivered a presentation on the history of AIPM and the need to manage some pests on an areawide basis. AIPM is particularly useful for sites that are not suitable for management on an individual basis, such as natural and urban areas or for public health pests. It is similar to IPM, Zalom said, in that its focus is on implementing systems-based strategies that utilize multiple tactics which emphasize prevention, avoidance, monitoring, and suppression using practices that are biologically-based and reduce risk to human health and the environment. However, its focus is on managing pest populations in all the habitats in which they occur. It involves multi-year strategic planning and organization, and it tends to utilize technologies that may be difficult or less effective when used on a limited scale.
First found in Napa County in 2009, the moth was eventually detected in nine California counties. A partnership that included the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), California Department of Food and Agriculture, County Agricultural Commissioner Offices, grape growers, and University of California Cooperative Extension Advisers and specialists implemented an applied research and public outreach and engagement program that ultimately resulted in the elimination of the insect from throughout these grape-growing areas. (For its work, the European Grapevine Moth Team, led by Lucia Varela, UC IPM advisor, won a Distinguished Service Team award in 2016 from UC Agriculture and Natural Resources, and received an international award at this year's 9th International IPM Symposium.)
Note that Rep. Gabbard, in particular, wants to protect Hawaii's coffee industry from the recently introduced coffee berry borer, and Rep. Yoho, the U.S. citrus industry from the Asian citrus psyllid and the devastating bacterial disease that it vectors.
Partner host organizations included the ESA, Weed Science Society of America and the Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities (APLU).
Four panelists—Faith Oi of the University of Florida, Lee Van Wychen of the Weed Science Society of America, Paula Shrewsbury of the University of Maryland and Kelley Tilmon of Ohio State University--zeroed in on urban pests, aquatic pests, forestry pests, and agricultural pests, respectively, and the industry impacts.
- Oi elaborated on mosquitoes, including the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, a major public health issue.
- Van Wychen discussed the waterhyacinth, an aquatic pest in the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta and Everglades in Florida.
- Shrewsbury drew attention to the emerald ash borer, a pest in both urban and rural forests
- Tilmon covered the agricultural pest, the brown marmorated stink bug.
The panelists focused on various geographic topics to help Congressional offices from across the nation understand why AIPM is relevant to them and to support AIPM-related policies.
AIPM strategies not only offer important economic, health and environmental benefits, Zalom said, but the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 directs federal agencies to use IPM techniques in carrying out pest management activities.
Coffee, wine and baseball bats? The next time you're enjoying a ball game or sipping a cup of coffee or a glass of wine, think about the emerald ash borer, coffee berry borer and the European gravevine moth.
And the IPM specialists trying to protect us from invasive species...

- Author: James A. Bethke
I often teach that there is a place for pesticides, especially when there are no effective alternatives. For instance, if you leave the aphids alone on your rose plants, they will eventually disappear due to the abundance of all the associated natural enemies like ladybird beetles. Some damage will occur, but the end result will be enjoyable roses in the landscape or in a vase. However, if you are going to show the rose - that first early season rose is the most brilliant - and not protect it, it will not be showable. Similarly, it is a shame if you own a 100-year old beautiful shade tree in your yard and you let a pest destroy it when you could have prevented it.
There is a concern by many that the systemic neonicotinoid insecticides are harming wildlife and the environment, and many folks are not willing to use them or purchase plants that have been treated with them. That is amazingly unfortunate because of all the benefits of this insecticide class, and much of the expressed concerns are scientifically unfounded.
The best example I can give of a fit or a need for insecticide use is presented in the case of the Emerald Ash Borer (EAB). EAB is a beetle as an adult, but the immature form, called a grub, is responsible for girdling ash trees and killing them within three years depending on the size of the tree and the extent of the infestation. EAB has been blamed for killing tens of millions of trees in about 22 states, and it is said, that the destruction of the ash in our forests and urban landscapes could rival the loss of elms due to the Dutch elm disease. That's significant. The benefits of ash trees in the landscape is clear, so the loss of all or nearly all of the landscape ash would be devastating, in my opinion.
There are those, however, that would not protect the trees with neonicotinoid insecticides at any cost. Unfortunately, there are grand examples of communities that refuse to protect their trees with systemic neonicotinoid insecticides, and I recommend that you take a look at the before and after pictures attached and check out the links to more information below. You will see that there is a place for insecticide use in this instance. Some may say that we can replace the landscape trees with alternatives that won't be affected. That's true, but it won't save our forests, and it will leave infected trees in our urban landscapes that will act as a reservoir for the beetle.
