Posts Tagged: food security
More green spaces and urban farming opportunities could be helpful in future disasters
People who turned to gardening during the COVID-19 pandemic did so to relieve stress, connect with others and grow their own food in hopes of avoiding the virus, according to a survey conducted by researchers at the University of California, Davis, UC Agriculture and Natural Resources and international partners.
The survey report, “Gardening during COVID-19: experiences from gardeners around the world,” highlights the positive role gardening plays in mental and physical health, said Alessandro Ossola, an assistant professor of plant sciences.
“Connection to nature, relaxation and stress relief were by far the biggest reasons gardeners cited,” Ossola said.
The researchers sent links to online surveys via targeted emails to gardening groups, in newsletters and on social media between June and August 2020. They were hoping to gauge the significance of gardening as a way to cope with risk, how the pandemic changed gardening and what barriers existed.
More than 3,700 surveys were returned by gardeners from Australia, Germany and the United States.
Isolation, depression, anxiety reported
More than half of those responding said they felt isolated, anxious and depressed during the early days of the pandemic and 81% had concerns about food access. During this time, people also had more time to garden, and they saw the activity as a safe haven and a way to connect socially with others.
“Not only did gardeners describe a sense of control and security that came from food production, but they also expressed heightened experiences of joy, beauty and freedom in garden spaces,” said the report, which broke up responses by region or states.
In California, for instance, 33% of gardeners said their plots generated about 25% of their produce needs. Some gardeners with access to large spots to garden also grew food for their community.
Gardening offered a way to socialize safely during the pandemic
“People found new connections in the garden,” said Lucy Diekmann, a UC Cooperative Extension urban agriculture and food systems advisor who helped write the report. “It became a shared hobby as opposed to an individual one.”
Responses were fairly similar across all locations, even though the surveys hit in the summer and winter depending on location. “We see remarkable similarities in terms of what people are saying and the way they are interacting with their gardens,”Diekmann said.
More green opportunities needed
Many respondents also found it hard to find and buy seeds or plants and locate a spot to grow.
The report findings suggest an opportunity for government, community groups, businesses and others to promote community health by providing green spaces.
Gardening should be thought of as a public health need, one that could serve communities well in future pandemics or disasters. New Zealand, Canada and some countries in Europe write green prescriptions for people to garden to improve health.
“We need to change the narrative of how urban gardening is framed and elevate it to a key strategy for both environmental and public health,” Ossola said.
UC Davis graduate student Summer Cortez assisted with the research, as did Monika Egerer at the Technical University of Munich in Germany and experts from these Australian-based entities: Brenda Lin at Commonwealth Science and Industrial Research Organization, Jonathan Kingsley at Swinburne University of Technology and Pauline Marsh at University of Tasmania.
During the month of June, families at the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indian Tribe and nearby trailer parks in eastern Coachella Valley received free produce boxes weekly from the USDA Farmers to Families Food Box Program.
This program was created by USDA to give families in need access to fresh food during the coronavirus pandemic. From May 15 to June 30, USDA purchased agricultural products under Families First Coronavirus Response Act from suppliers who were impacted by closure of restaurants and other food service businesses for distribution to those in need.
The UC Agriculture and Natural Resources CalFresh Healthy Living Program at UC Cooperative Extension in Riverside County helped connect the Torres Martinez Tribal Council with Sunrise Produce Company, a supplier in Southern California that contracted with USDA.
About 400 22-pound produce boxes were delivered to the tribal headquarters every Friday in June. Vice chairman Joseph Mirelez of the Torres Martinez Tribal Council and his team organized the truckload delivery and distribution. CalFresh Healthy Living, UC nutrition educator Jackie Barahona provided indirect education by distributing recipe cards from Leah's Pantry and handouts with the "eating the rainbow" recommendation from the Plate Full of Color storybook produced by CDC Native Diabetes Wellness Program.
According to the American Community Survey (2014-2018), 28% of families in Thermal live below poverty level (shaperivco.org). In addition, 16.7% (14,647) of children in Coachella Valley live in households where their parents/guardians were often or sometimes concerned about their ability to buy food. (harcdata.org, 2019)
20200605 114905 resized
20200605 132838 resized
20200605 141621 resized
Native Americans suffer from the highest rates of food insecurity, poverty and diet-related disease in the United States. A new study finds that Native American communities could improve their food security with a greater ability to hunt, fish, gather and preserve their own food.
“How food security is framed, and by whom, shapes the interventions or solutions that are proposed,” said Jennifer Sowerwine, UC Cooperative Extension specialist at UC Berkeley, who led the study in partnership with the Karuk, Yurok, Hoopa, and Klamath Tribes. “Our research suggests that current measures of and solutions to food insecurity in the United States need to be more culturally relevant to effectively assess and address chronic food insecurity in Native American communities.”
The study conducted by researchers at UC Berkeley and four Native American tribes shows that 92% of Native American households in the Klamath Basin suffer from food insecurity.
Native American tribes in the Klamath Basin seasonally harvest, consume and store diverse aquatic and terrestrial native foods including salmon, acorns and deer. In survey responses, 86% of the participants said they consumed native foods at least once in the previous year. Yet significant barriers, including restrictive laws and wildlife habitat degradation, limit availability and quality of these foods.
While 64% of Native American households in the Klamath Basin rely on food assistance (compared to the national average of 12%), 84% of the Native Americans using food assistance worried about running out of food or had run out of food. This suggests the need to consider more effective solutions rooted in eco-cultural restoration and food sovereignty to address food insecurity in Native American communities.
Study participants strongly expressed the desire for strengthened tribal governance of Native lands and stewardship of cultural resources to increase access to native foods, as well as strengthening skills for self-reliance including support for home food production. Community members suggested solutions including tribe-led workshops on native foods gathering, preparation and preservation; removing legal barriers to hunt, fish and gather; restoring traditional rights to hunt, fish and gather on tribal ancestral lands; providing culturally relevant education and employment opportunities to tribal members; and increased funding for native foods programs.
While growing evidence suggests that native foods are the most nutritious and culturally appropriate foods for Native American people – and over 99% of people surveyed in the region said they want more of these foods – nearly 70% said they never or rarely get access to the native foods they want.
“We know our efforts to revitalize and care for our food system through traditional land management are critical to the physical and cultural survival of the humans who are part of it,” said Leaf Hillman, program manager for the Karuk Tribe's Píkyav Field Institute. “This study will support our ability to bring that message to the decisionmakers who need to hear it.”
With the study results indicating that increased access to native foods and support for cultural institutions such as traditional knowledge and food sharing are key to solving food insecurity in Native American communities, Sowerwine and the research team propose including access to native foods as a measure for evaluating food security for Native people.
The assessment is based on 711 surveys completed by households from the Karuk, Yurok, Hoopa and Klamath Tribes, 115 interviews with cultural practitioners and food system stakeholders, and 20 focus groups with tribal members or descendants.
In addition to Sowerwine and Hillman, the study was conducted by post-doctoral researchers Megan Mucioki and Dan Sarna-Wojcicki, and research partners from the Yurok, Karuk and Klamath Tribes.
“Partnering with tribal community members in the research makes the research stronger, and that is especially true in this unique food security assessment,” said Sowerwine. “With the study design grounded in nearly a decade of relationship-building and respectful engagement with our tribal partners, we are confident that our results reflect their priority questions and concerns while contributing valuable new information to the field of indigenous food systems.”
“Reframing food security by and for Native American communities: a case study among tribes in the Klamath River basin of Oregon and California” is published in the journal Food Security.
This research was part of a $4 million, five-year Tribal Food Security Project funded by USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture-Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Food Security Grant #2012-68004-20018. For full results and recommendations from the project team, visit https://nature.berkeley.edu/karuk-collaborative/?page_id=1088.
Un recorte a SNAP o incremento en el costo de alimentos haría más difícil comer de forma saludable con un presupuesto limitado.
La asequibilidad de los alimentos saludables se menciona con frecuencia como una barrera para que las familias de bajos ingresos consuman comidas saludables. Un nuevo estudio publicado por el Journal of Nutrition Education and Behaviorreveló que con la planeación de un menú y el acceso a tiendas que vendes productos al por mayor, el costo promedio diario para servir comidas saludables para una familia de cuatro era de 25 dólares del 2010. Este costo estaba era consistente con el plan de alimentos para de ingresos limitados del Departamento de Agricultura de Estados Unidos (USDA, por sus siglas en inglés), pero más alto que el Thrifty Food Plan de USDA. El Thrifty Food Plan es el plan de comidas usado por USDA para calcular los beneficios recibidos bajo la asistencia alimenticia.
“Este estudio determinó la probabilidad de que las familias que viven en hogares de bajos ingresos pudieran crear comidas que se apeguen a las pautas alimenticias de USDA presentadas en la información sobre educación alimenticia de MiPlato”, señaló la autora principal del estudio, Karen M. Jetter, del Centro de Asuntos Agrícolas de UC, el cual es parte de la División de Agricultura y Recursos Naturales de UC. “Además del costo de los alimentos, los otros factores considerados fueron el acceso a tiendas, tiempo para preparar alimentos y si los menús incluían alimentos culturalmente apropiados”.
Jetter también advirtió que cualquier reducción en los beneficios que se reciben de SNAP, el Programa de Asistencia para una Nutrición Suplementaria para personas que califican por ingresos bajos o un incremento en el costo de los alimentos dificultaría las posibilidades de que las familias económicamente vulnerables pudieran comer alimentos saludables.
Este proyecto se llevó a cabo en colaboración con el Northern Valley Indian Health, Inc y la tribu indígena Mechoopda de Chico Rancheria donde un 88 por ciento de la población encuestada vive en hogares con un ingreso menor o igual a 35 mil dólares al año. Los menús fueron creados para alimentar a una familia con un padre, una madre y niños de entre siete y diez años, con alimentos que les gusta comer a la comunidad de la tribu indígena Mechoopda, cumplen con las directrices de una alimentación sana de USDA y tienen porciones realistas. Los menús no dependieron de alimentos procesados con el fin de reducir la cantidad de grasas y sal en la dieta familiar, fueron variados para que las familias no se cansaran de comer los mismos alimentos, no siempre requerían de preparar comidas calientes y eran económicos.
Trabajando muy de cerca con los investigadores de la comunidad de la tribu indígena Mechoopda, se crearon menús para dos semanas usando planes de comidas provistos por la misma comunidad indígena. No obstante que estos planes no cumplían con las directrices nutricionales cada día, todas las categorías mantenían en promedio los niveles recomendados al final de un periodo de dos semanas.
“Estos menús mostraron que se logró llevar una dieta saludable dentro de un presupuesto al equilibrar objetivos diarios durante dos semanas, no a diario. Esto se enfoca en comer de manera equilibrada en lugar de verse privado”, dijo Jetter.
Una vez que los menús fueron determinados, los investigadores de la comunidad de la tribu indígena Mechoopda visitaron 13 tiendas de abarrotes en Chico para comprobar los precios de los menús. Las tiendas se encontraban, a 10 minutos en auto, para el 76 por ciento de los miembros de la comunidad indígena y fueron clasificadas como supermercados de venta al por mayor, supermercados generales, mercados de descuento o de especialidad como una cooperativa local.
Tanto los supermercados generales como los de venta al por mayor tenían mayor disponibilidad de productos necesarios para la lista de compras de dos semanas, mientras que los mercados de especialidad o descuento no tenían hasta 52 de los productos necesarios. Los mercados de descuento y de venta a volumen tuvieron el costo promedio más bajo de 25 dólares diarios, mientras que los mercados de especialidad tuvieron el costo promedio más alto de 39 dólares diarios
Una de las limitaciones del estudio fue su enfoque en el costo actual de los alimentos sin tomar en cuenta los costos transaccionales como el tiempo necesario para planear los menús, preparar las listas de compras, la búsqueda de ofertas de las tiendas y el viaje a los supermercados de venta a volumen que ofrecían los precios más bajos. Todos estos factores influyen en la habilidad de una familia de sustentar un plan de alimentación saludable.
“Esta investigación demuestra que una familia de cuatro puede comprar menús que cumplen con las directrices de USDA cuando compran en supermercados de venta al por mayor, pero cualquier reducción en los beneficios de SNAP o un incremento en el costo de los alimentos puede hacer difícil que estas familias económicamente vulnerables mantengan un estilo de vida saludable”, recalcó Jetter.
Este Proyecto fue parte de un proyecto más grande financiado por un subsidio de los Institutos Nacionales de la Salud.
Eating healthy on a limited budget is possible, but any cuts in SNAP or rise in food costs make it harder
The affordability of healthy food is often cited as a barrier to low-income families eating nutritious meals. A new study published in the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior found that with menu planning and access to stores selling items in bulk, the average daily cost for serving healthy meals to a family of four was $25 in 2010 dollars. This cost was consistent with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) low-income cost of food meal plan, but higher than the cost of the USDA Thrifty Food Plan. The Thrifty Food Plan is the meal plan used by the USDA to determine food assistance benefits.
“This study determined the likelihood that families living in low-income households could create meals that meet the USDA dietary guidelines presented in MyPlate nutrition education materials,” said lead author Karen M. Jetter, Ph.D., of the UC Agricultural Issues Center, which is part of UC Agriculture and Natural Resources. “In addition to food cost, the other factors considered were access to stores, time for meal preparation, and whether the menus included culturally appropriate foods.”
Jetter also cautioned that any reduction in SNAP, the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for people with qualifying low incomes, or increase in food costs would make it hard for economically vulnerable families to eat healthy foods.
This project was conducted in collaboration with Northern Valley Indian Health, Inc, and the Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria where 88 percent of the population surveyed lived in households with an income of less than or equal to $35,000 a year. The menus were created to feed a household with a father, mother, and children ages 7 and 10 with foods the Mechoopda Indian Tribe community liked to eat, met USDA guidelines for healthy eating, and had realistic portions. Menus did not rely on processed foods to reduce the amount of fat and salt in the family diet, were varied so the family would not become bored eating the same foods, did not always require hot meal preparation, and were affordable.
By working closely with the Mechoopda Indian Tribe community researchers, two-weeks of daily menus were developed using meal plans provided by the Mechoopda Indian Tribe community. Although these plans did not meet the nutritional guidelines every day, all categories achieved the recommended levels on average at the end of a two-week period.
“These menus showed that a healthy diet on a budget was achieved by balancing daily targets over two weeks, not every day. This focuses healthy eating on balance rather than being deprived,” said Jetter.
Once the menus were determined, the Mechoopda Indian Tribe community researchers visited 13 grocery stores in Chico to ascertain menu costs. The stores visited were within a 10-minute car ride of 76 percent of the Mechoopda Indian Tribe members and were classified as bulk supermarket, general supermarket, discount market, or specialty market such as a local co-op.
Both bulk and general supermarkets had the highest availability of the items needed for a two-week shopping list, whereas specialty and discount markets lacked as many as 52 of the items needed. Bulk and discount market baskets had the lowest average daily cost of $25, while the specialty market had the highest average cost of $39 per day.
One limitation of the study was the focus on the actual cost of food without considering transactional costs such as the time needed to plan menus, develop shopping lists, research store advertisements, and travel to the bulk supermarket that offered the lowest cost. All of these factors influence a family's ability to sustain a healthy eating plan.
“This research demonstrates that menus that meet USDA guidelines can be purchased by a family of four when shopping at a bulk supermarket, but any reduction in SNAP benefits or increase in food costs would make it difficult for these economically vulnerable families to maintain a healthy lifestyle,” stressed Jetter.
This project was part of a larger project funded by a National Institutes of Health grant.