- Author: Michael D Cahn, Ph.D.
Agricultural Order Public Scoping Meeting
Monday, August 7th 9 am – 11:30 am
Monterey County Agriculture Conference Room
1432 Abbott St.
The current Agricultural Order which regulates water quality for irrigated agriculture on the Central Coast will expire on March 8, 2020. Ahead of this deadline, The Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (CCRWQCB) staff must develop a new Agricultural Order. Water Quality Control Board members and staff will be hosting several listening sessions where attendees will have the opportunity to share their perspective and experiences regarding the pros, cons, and ideas for potential improvement of the Ag Order. Discussion topics will include the structure of the Ag Order, such as tiering and enrollment, as well as monitoring and reporting requirements.
The current agenda is:
1. Current Agricultural Order Staff will present a summary. Public will have the opportunity to comment on the current Ag Order structure, including enrollment; tiering; electronic notice of intent form; annual compliance form.
2. Water Quality Monitoring Public will have the opportunity to comment on the surface water and groundwater monitoring requirements; cooperatives conducting monitoring such as the Preservation Inc.'s Cooperative Monitoring Program and the Central Coast Groundwater Coalition.
3. Total Nitrogen Applied Public will have the opportunity to comment on the total nitrogen applied requirement.
5. Tier 3 Ranch Requirements Public will have the opportunity to comment on Ag Order requirements for tier 3 ranches, including individual surface water discharge monitoring; irrigation and nutrient management plan reporting; water quality buffer plans.
6. Missing Requirements Public will have the opportunity to comment on the requirements they deem are necessary but currently not in the Ag Order.
A quorum of Central Coast Water Board members may be present; however, the Central Coast Water Board will not be taking any action at the scoping meeting.
The meeting will be conducted in English, Spanish translation will be provided for attendees sharing a comment in Spanish.
Esta reunión se va a llevar a cabo en inglés, pero va a haber traducción al español disponible para aquellas personas que quieran dar testimonio en español.
If you cannot attend this meeting, there will be another opportunity in Watsonville at the Public library on August 15th. Please see the attached flyers for more information./h3>
Studies that examine crop production and harvest costs, as well as capital costs and net returns, can be helpful to growers in making production decisions, preparing budgets, and evaluating production loans. Cost and return analyses can also assist growers in considering risk and in determining the potential profitability of a crop. Two recently completed studies estimating costs and returns for Central Coast wrapped iceberg lettuce and fresh market bunched broccoli are now available at https://coststudies.ucdavis.edu. Titled Sample Costs to Produce and Harvest Iceberg Lettuce 2017 and Sample Costs to Produce and Harvest Broccoli 2017, these studies were a collaborative effort that included UC Cooperative Extension farm advisors, local growers and industry, and UC Agricultural Issues Center economists and researchers.
Each study begins with a narrative that describes how the costs and returns were calculated. Following this text, an in-depth analysis of the estimated production and harvest costs are presented in a series of tables. Per acre costs are shown for land preparation, fertilization and pest management practices, and material inputs and labor, all of which fall under the category cultural costs. Harvest practices and costs are also detailed. Cash or business overhead costs are estimated, and include items such as land rent, insurance, food safety and regulatory programs. Finally, non-cash or investment costs are discussed and included in each study. Table 1 summarizes per acre costs for iceberg lettuce and broccoli. Greater detail on the sequence of operations and costs contained in each broad cgory can be found in the studies.
Monthly cash cost tables are presented in each study, which can be helpful in managing cash flow and understanding when production loans may be needed. In addition, the tables can be used to evaluate months with peak labor demands and assist with scheduling.
A ranging analysis is also included in each study, which estimates net returns per acre above operating, cash, and total costs for several alternative yield and price combinations. For lettuce, net returns are calculated for yields ranging from 600 to 1,200 cartons per acre (24 film wrapped heads weighing 42 pounds) and prices ranging from $9 to $17 per carton. For broccoli, net returns are estimated using a yield range of 550 to 850 cartons per acre (14 bunches weighing 21 pounds) and prices ranging from $8 to $13.10 per carton. Tables 2 and 3 below contain a selection of the estimated net returns above total costs for lettuce and broccoli.
At the lower yields and prices for iceberg lettuce (table 2), growers operate at a net loss per acre. As yields and prices improve, however, there is potential for a modest positive net return per acre. Growers of bunched broccoli operate at a net loss per acre regardless of yield or price scenario (table 3). The loss is smaller as yields and prices improve. Though net returns to growers can vary substantially from crop to crop and depend on many production and market conditions, the results from both studies—most notably for bunched broccoli—show that there is currently substantial pressure for growers to increase net returns. To improve profitability, growers may use different pack types and market strategies. High labor costs and low product prices, at least in part, help explain the results shown here. An expanded analysis can be found in each study.
Although technology has begun to play a larger role in the production and harvest of fresh market crops than it has in the past, a reliable and productive labor force is still critical to bring a crop to market. Labor costs are discussed and calculated for each crop, with hourly wages set at $21.85 for equipment operators, $17.80 for irrigators, and $16.90 for field workers. These rates include overhead costs of 41 percent. Irrigation, weed management, and harvest are prominent “high cost” labor practices.
New minimum wage and overtime laws that were passed in California in 2016 will have significant implications for agriculture. Although wage rates used in the studies are already higher than the minimum wage shown below for 2017, tables 4 and 5 provide information on the phase-in schedules for the new laws.
As table 4 indicates, minimum wage will steadily increase each year, reaching a $15 base wage per hour by 2022. Table 5 shows that the overtime law will gradually decrease the number of hours employees can work on a weekly basis before overtime wages are required. Prior to its passage agricultural workers could work up to 10 hours per day or 60 hours per week without overtime wages; by 2022 the requirement will be lowered to 8 hours per day or 40 hours per week for employers with 26 or more employees. The overtime law may change wages and scheduling of work in complicated ways as it is phased in.
The full impact of the two new laws on prevailing agricultural wages is not yet clear. But the studies recognize that growers may already pay wages that are different than those used to calculate the letter and broccoli costs, and that agricultural wages are currently in flux. The studies also note that growers may choose to use a farm labor contractor or the H-2A guest worker visa program to employ workers and assure a reliable supply of labor.
Vegetable and other cost and return studies for this area, and for other regions in California, are updated periodically, and are always available at https://coststudies.ucdavis.edu. Questions about these or other studies can be directed to either Laura Tourte or Richard Smith at UC Cooperative Extension.
The factors controlling cadmium (Cd) uptake by leafy greens, particularly spinach, have been the focus of intensive study since 2014. By far the largest influence is the soil test Cd level (Fig. 1A). Coastal soils vary from in total Cd content from less than 0.5 PPM to more than 8 PPM; across this range spinach Cd concentration varies by at least a factor of 10. This is the reason why spinach should not be grown on soils of very high Cd content, at least not without some remediation effort to reduce Cd uptake by the crop. However, if one looks at the relationship between soil and spinach Cd concentrations over a narrower range of soil Cd content it becomes clear that factors other than soil Cd content affect spinach Cd uptake (Fig. 1B). Among those factors is the concentration of chloride (Cl) in the soil.
In soils of neutral to alkaline pH like those of coastal California, much of the Cd in the soil is precipitated in compounds of low solubility, or adsorbed on the surface of soil minerals; this reduces the plant availability of soil Cd. Chloride has been shown to enhance the solubility (and therefore, the plant availability) of soil Cd; in this regard Cl is different from the other common anions in the soil (sulfate or nitrate). The main factors governing the amount of Cl in soil are the Cl concentration of irrigation water, and the degree of leaching for salinity control.
To determine how significant an influence soil Cl can be on spinach Cd uptake a pot trial was conducted in 2016. A loam soil with a total Cd content of 1.5 PPM was used. Large pots containing approximately 7 pounds of soil were seeded with ‘Tambourine' spinach seed. Different Cl treatments were imposed by watering the pots with one of four levels of irrigation water Cl concentration. The irrigation water Cl concentrations evaluated were 1, 4, 7 and 10 milliequivalents per liter (meq/L), equal to approximately 35, 140, 250 and 360 PPM Cl. For context, irrigation water on the central coast typically ranges between 1-7 meq/L, occasionally higher. These solutions were made by adding Cl to a low Cl concentration water. A mixture of sodium and calcium chloride was used to maintain a reasonable cation balance. All pots were germinated with the low Cl water, with the different Cl treatments beginning 7 days after seeding. Watering was controlled to ensure at least 10% of applied water leached from the pots, to maintain a relatively constant soil Cl concentration over the trial period. The spinach was allowed to grow for approximately a month, and then the entire vegetative biomass was harvested, oven-dried, ground and analyzed for Cd concentration. The experimental design of the trial was a randomized complete block, with 4 replicate pots per irrigation Cl treatment.
Spinach Cd concentration increased linearly with increasing irrigation water Cl concentration (Fig. 2). The slope of the regression line showed that each meq/L increase in irrigation water Cl corresponded to a 0.025 PPM increase in fresh tissue Cd concentration. This suggested that irrigation water quality can be a potentially significant factor in spinach Cl uptake. All other factors being equal, a field irrigated with water containing 7 meq/L Cl (250 PPM) may produce spinach with a Cd concentration more than 25% higher than if lower Cl irrigation water was used. These results may actually understate the effect of Cl. In this trial all treatments were germinated with low Cl water, meaning that the initial Cl status of the soil was low across treatments; it may have been well into the growth cycle before soil Cl concentrations fully reflected the treatment differences. In a commercial field situation, irrigating with high Cl water would set a baseline of soil Cl concentration at a relatively high level, affecting the crop from germination onward.
We realize that growers often do not have a choice of irrigation wells to use on a particular field. Where a choice of irrigation water exists, using the lower Cl water would minimize spinach Cd uptake. More broadly, it seems appropriate to use irrigation water Cl concentration as one factor in the determination of which fields to use for spinach production.
Finally. Under the guidance of USDA-ARS and other researchers, and with the help of the California Strawberry Commission and other supporters, the UC Cooperative Extension diagnostic laboratory in Salinas finally has joined the 21st century regarding molecular diagnostic technologies. A DNA-based test is now being implemented to detect and confirm important soilborne diseases of coastal crops. This method can complete the diagnostic process in a few hours, compared to the conventional culture method, which usually takes several days.
The Need. Rapid, accurate, and dependable diagnosis of plant diseases is an essential part of agriculture production. Without knowing the precise agent responsible for the disease, growers, pest control advisers, and other field personnel are hampered when making disease management decisions. Soilborne diseases are particularly challenging to identify. In general, the appearances of the various root rots, crown rots, plant collapses, and vascular wilts all look very similar, making it virtually impossible to diagnose these based on symptoms alone. The UC Cooperative Extension laboratory has some very accurate culture methods to grow out and detect all of these soilborne pathogens. However, such culture techniques are relatively slow and take from three to seven days to complete. For our fast growing coastal crops a more rapid means of disease diagnosis would well serve the growers.
The Method. The new method goes by the name “RPA” which stands for recombinase polymerase amplification. The RPA method, like many other technologies such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), is based on DNA components (called primers and probe) that specifically recognize the corresponding DNA found in the target pathogen. However, all PCR methods depend on extracting and purifying the pathogen DNA; getting the DNA out is costly (one needs to buy expensive equipment to analyze the sample) and it requires more time to complete the elaborate procedures. RPA is perfectly suited to an extension laboratory, like the one in Salinas, because DNA purification is not needed as the test uses ground up, crude plant extracts as a source of unpurified DNA (see photos below).
Pathogens Detected. Presently the UC Cooperative Extension laboratory offers RPA diagnostic tests for two pathogens. Phytophthora causes root and crown rots on strawberry, raspberry, and a number of vegetable crops and ornamental/forest plants. Our Phytophthora tests are either genus-specific (it will detect Phytophthora infecting many types of plants) or species-specific for the two pathogens that mostly attack strawberry (P. cactorum and P. fragariae) (Table 1). Our other RPA test detects the specific type of Macrophomina phaseolina that causes severe crown rot and collapse of strawberry. Because this Macrophomina RPA is designed for the strawberry pathogen and not for Macrophomina that infects other crops, this is called a genotype-specific test (Table 1). This summer we anticipate adding tests for the Verticillium wilt pathogen (V. dahliae that infects many crops) and the Fusarium wilt pathogen of strawberry (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae). All tests analyze infected plant material only. However, it is hoped that our continuing research will adapt RPA or more sophisticated molecular techniques for detecting these pathogens in soil.
Table 1. RPA tests currently available at the UC Cooperative Extension laboratory.
Category of test
Detects this pathogen in all plants, such as strawberry, raspberry, pepper, asparagus, tomato, avocado, ornamentals, forest species (sudden oak death pathogen)
Primarily for strawberry but this pathogen can be found on ornamentals such as coffee berry
For Macrophomina that infects strawberry
The Future. Because this RPA method is similar in design to PCR, and PCR is used to develop the DNA tools (primers) to detect any sort of organism, the RPA platform is open ended. It should be possible to readily develop RPA tests for any organism that has DNA, such as other pathogenic fungi and bacteria, nematodes, and even perhaps specialized sub-groups of organisms such as insect biotypes.
Acknowledgements. This advance in rapid, accurate disease diagnostics was developed and implemented by the following research and extension team: Mark Bolda (UC Extension, Santa Cruz Co.), Alyssa Burkhardt (USDA-ARS, Salinas), Oleg Daugovish (UC Extension, Ventura Co.), Steven Koike (UC Extension, Monterey Co.), Frank Martin (USDA-ARS, Salinas), Stacy Mauzey (UC Extension, Monterey Co.), Tim Miles (CSU Monterey Bay), and Cayla Tsuchida (UC Extension, Monterey Co.). This research was supported by the California Strawberry Commission, California Avocado Commission CSU Agricultural Research Institute (grant 5219101A), and the USDA-California Department of Food and Agriculture Specialty Crop Block Grant Program (grants SCB12051 and SCB14052 awarded to F. Martin).
Photo 1: Strawberry samples are examined for symptomatic tissues that indicate possible disease.
Photo 2: Pieces of root, crown, or petiole are macerated and ground up in sample bags containing buffer solutions.
Photo 3: The resulting mixtures are strained and placed into tubes.
Photo 4: Small volumes of the strawberry extracts are loaded into strip tubes.
Photo 5: Loaded strip tubes are placed into the RPA isothermal detection device.
Photo 6: In the computer generated results, samples positive (red bar) for Phytophthora root and crown rot will appear as curved lines moving upwards; negative samples (blue bar) will appear as straight lines mostly remaining flat.
Organic production in Monterey County was valued at $335 million in 2015, which was 7% of total agricultural value. Organic agriculture has a prominent role in Monterey County agriculture, but many aspects of organic production are still poorly understood and are in need of more research. The transformations of nitrogen (N) that occur in soil, and organic amendments and fertilizers that ultimately produce plant available forms of nitrogen (nitrate and ammonium, a.k.a. mineral nitrogen) are only understood in a general way. In 2016 we received funding from the Fertilizer Research and Education Program (FREP) which is funded by a mil tax on fertilizer sales, including organic fertilizers, to evaluate nitrogen mineralization (release of mineral nitrogen from soil organic matter) from soils on organic farms and from organic fertilizers. Evaluations included determination of the mineralization of soil organic matter over the course of the cropping cycle of baby vegetables and full-term romaine. In addition, evaluations were conducted of mineralization of organic fertilizers in production fields as well as laboratory incubations carried out at UC, Davis.
Evaluations of soil organic matter
Ten N mineralization trials were conducted in the Salinas Valley with cooperating growers in commercial production fields in diverse locations and with a spectrum of soil types. Field evaluations consisted of establishing replicated unfertilized areas in each field. Within each unfertilized plot, we had areas with and without plants, as well as an area covered with plastic mulch; these areas allowed us to estimate the amount of N mineralized from soil organic matter without the confounding factors of crop uptake and leaching. Unfertilized areas were compared with adjacent fertilized plots. The amount of N mineralized in field evaluations ranged from 0.6 to 3.3 lbs N/A/day; more N mineralization generally occurred in soils with greater quantities of total N in the soil. Nitrate-N at the beginning of the cropping cycle was a useful indication of the amount of N available for crop growth during the crop cycle (Figure 1). Not surprisingly, the sites with low levels of soil nitrate at the start of the crop cycle had greater responses to applied fertilizer. Initial soil nitrate levels would be a great tool for organic growers to utilize to help guide fertilizer decisions, however from these data it is clear that it is not precise enough to fully guide fertilizer decisions except for when levels are extremely high or extremely low. The fields that had initial soil nitrate-N levels of 75-125 lbs N/A had 15-30% greater yield with applied nitrogen fertilizer, even though N uptake by crops was modest for all crops except broccoli. One reason measurements of initial residual soil nitrate levels may not be as good of a predictor of crop response to N might be due to inefficiencies in irrigation management which could result in movement of N beyond the root zone. Water used to germinate the crop or set transplants often exceeds the ability of the soil to retain it, resulting in nitrate leaching at the beginning of the crop cycle. Measuring residual soil nitrate after the germination water applications could improve the estimates of available residual soil nitrate. However, the fast crop cycle of the baby vegetables, necessitates making fertilizer decisions early in the crop cycle.
The nitrate levels in the irrigation water in the surveyed sites was low to moderate and did not contribute large amounts of N to the crop budget (Table 1). Mineralization of N from the soil organic matter over the course of the crop cycle was also low to moderate in the surveyed sites. All the crops surveyed in these evaluations have rapid N uptake patterns in the last half of the crop cycle. It is at this time when robust quantities of N are needed to supply the crop with the amounts of N needed to maximize yields (Figures 2 and 3). The N release pattern of organic fertilizers is another factor that makes N management of organic crops difficult.
Evaluations of organic fertilizers
Organic fertilizers used in the production of cool season vegetables are either incorporated into the soil or applied to the top of the beds and sprinkled in. Based on these application methods, field evaluations of organic fertilizer were made by placing organic fertilizers in pouches (See photos below) and applying them to the soil in two ways: 1) buried 3 inches deep to simulate incorporated applications and 2) by placing the pouches on the soil surface to simulate surface (a.k.a. drop-on-top) applications. Pouch evaluations were conducted in commercial production fields and placed in the field at the beginning of the crop cycle. Three to four pouches were collected weekly and the contents were dried, weighed and analyzed for N, phosphorus (P) and potassium (K); the rate of disappearance of nutrients from the pouches estimated the rate of plant-availability. Organic fertilizers used were 4-4-2 (chicken, meat and bone meal) and 12-0-0 (feather meal). Evaluation 1 was a placement evaluation of 4-4-2 (buried vs surface applied). In this trial, 4-4-2 that was buried in the soil released mineral N more quickly and released more N than surface applications, 48.2 and 70.2%, respectively (Table 2). Evaluation 2 was a comparison of 4-4-2 and 12-0-0, both buried in the soil at the beginning of the crop cycle of a broccolini field that was in the ground for 71 days. 12-0-0 released N more quickly and released more mineral N than 4-4-2, 86.2 and 60.5%, respectively.
These evaluations show a rapid release of N from the organic fertilizer over the first 2 to 3 weeks after application. After that time, the rate of release of N is very slow. Burying the material increased the rate of N release; fertilizer with a higher N concentration showed faster N release. It is possible that the pouch evaluations overestimate the N release rate because of movement of small particles of fertilizer that filter out of the pouch; this idea is supported by observations in a laboratory evaluation conducted at Davis that showed about a 20-30% lower rate of N release of 4-4-2 and 12-0-0 over the same period of time (Table 3).
The amount of N applied as fertilizer ranged from 1.2 to 4.8 times crop N uptake (Table 1). However, discounting the amount of N that actually mineralizes from the organic fertilizer, organic fertilizer applications in this survey ranged from 0.4 to 2.7 times crop N uptake.
Soil P values at each survey site were relatively modest for the Salinas Valley vegetable ground, except for one that was located on an old dairy. Bicarbonate extractable P values ranged from 10 to 57 ppm with a mean of 37 ppm (excluding the old dairy site with a bicarbonate P value of 112 ppm). The moderate P values occurred in spite of the common usage of 4-4-2 which has a ratio of 1:1 of N:P2O5. The form of P in 4-4-2 fertilizer comes mostly from bone meal, which is not soluble at soil pH greater than 7.0; all survey sites had pH above 7.0, meaning that bone meal is a highly inefficient P source in this production system. In fertilizer pouch Evaluation 1, phosphorus release was 17% after 63 days in both surface and buried applications. Based on this survey, it appears that soil bicarbonate extractable P levels do not rise rapidly due to the use of 4-4-2. By contrast 82 to 92% of the K contained in 4-4-2 was rapidly released to the soil after 63 days in Evaluation 1.
Organic fertilization of fast-maturing cool season vegetables is complicated by a number of factors:
- The difficulty of utilizing residual soil nitrate monitoring, given the potential for nitrate leaching with these heavily irrigated, shallowly rooted crops
- Uncertain rates of N release from organic fertilizers due to the variable effects of temperature, fertilizer placement and fertilizer N concentration
- Difficulty synchronizing N release from soil and organic fertilizers with the high crop N demand over the last half of the crop cycle
These studies provided some evidence that measurements of residual soil nitrate can provide a useful tool for planning fertilizer programs in some situations. However, even soils with robust amounts of residual soil nitrate-N (100 – 125 lbs N/A) may still benefit from fertilizer in spite of mineralization of N from soil organic matter and nitrate in the irrigation water, and clearly more study is needed to better understand this issue. The release of N by organic fertilizer is affected by placement, N concentration of the material and temperature and this study provide some measurements of those effects. The fate of N not released from organic fertilizer after the crop cycle is not well understood, but presumably it becomes available to future crops, mineralizing at a slow, steady rate similar to soil organic matter. The high usage of 4-4-2 which is a mix of chicken manure blended with meat and bone meal on larger-scale organic farms brings the benefits of adding significant amounts of organic matter to ranches that may not have extensive cover crop or compost programs. However, use of 2-3,000 lbs 4-4-2 per crop 2-3 times per season adds 2-4.5 tons of carbon-rich organic matter to the soil. Measurements of P release from 4-4-2 indicate that the 1:1 ratio of N:P2O5 does not appear to be resulting in high levels of bicarbonate extractable P buildup in the soils surveyed in this study.