- Author: Siavash Taravati
Licensing for perimeter spraying under California's pest control laws is dependent on the situation and site (Table 1). Structural Pest Control Board (SPCB) licensees, Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) Qualified Applicator License (QAL) holders, and DPR Qualified Applicator Certificate (QAC) holders are all legally allowed to make perimeter spray applications to control ants and other pests immediately around structures. However, the intent of these applications determines the specific license needed.
SPCB licenses
If the perimeter spraying is performed to prevent the entry of ants or other insects into the structure, then a structural license is required. If the pests are coming from the lawn, then the lawn is considered as a “pest reservoir” and can be treated by the Branch 2 licensee.
DPR licenses
It is important to know what DPR license type allows the applicator to perform perimeter sprays.
- QAL holders with Category A (Residential, Industrial, and Institutional) can do perimeter treatments for ants or other pests that occur indoors and near the structure. QAL Category A licensees, however, cannot provide commercial service to customers (for hire). This license category is most common for governmental employees or institutional employees who perform in-house pest control services as part of their job.
- QAL holders with Category B (Landscape Maintenance) can do perimeter sprays as part of their landscape management efforts. For instance, if landscape shrubs get infested by aphids and tended by ants, then treatment of those plants and perimeter spraying, which incidentally prevents an ant invasion to the structure, is permitted.
- QAC, subcategory Q (Maintenance Gardeners) are also permitted to do perimeter sprays when the application is made as an incidental part of their maintenance gardening work.
It is wise for any pesticide applicator to make sure they are applying pesticides in the right place, at the right time, and for the right reason. Such forethought helps reduce environmental contamination and helps applicators avoid regulatory violations and their consequences.
Site/ Situation |
License Required |
Section Cited |
Description of Pest Control Conducted |
Adjacent to structure, garden, or orchard pest |
QAL Cat A, Cat B or QAC Subcat Q |
FAC §§ 11701 or 11704 |
Control (for the purpose of eliminating ants, earwigs, garden or non-crop orchard pests, or to assist in the control of honeydew producing insects) even where treatment is applied adjacent to a structure and incidentally prevents invasion of the structure. |
Landscape plants & turf |
QAL Cat B or QAC Subcat Q |
FAC §§ 11701 or 11704 |
Any application of a pesticide to existing landscape plants & turf, irrespective of their location in respect to a structure, except for incidental contact of foliage or plants with a pesticide arising from structural pest control activities. Any pesticide application made directly to interiorscapes in business buildings, office complexes, malls, houseplants within households. |
Structures, interior or exterior |
Structural |
B&PC § 8550 |
Control of ants, earwigs, cockroaches, silverfish, termites, birds, or rodents invading structures is strictly structural pest control, whether carried on within or outside of the structure. |
Structures, in or around |
Structural Branch 2 |
B&PC § 8550 |
Control of pests to humans and their pets, (it would apply to pests other than fleas, for example, mosquitoes) in or around a structure, including treatment of outside areas to control nearby nest or pest reservoir. |
[Originally featured in the Fall 2021 edition of the Green Bulletin Newsletter for structural and landscape pest professionals.]
Disclaimer: Readers should get the most updated regulatory information from federal, state, county, and city resources. Remember, laws change all the time!
Reference: PUE Program Standards Compendium Volume 1: General Administration of the Pesticide Use Enforcement Program – Section 10: Quick Reference Charts. cdpr.ca.gov/docs/enforce/compend/vol_1/entirerep.pdf
/caption>/h2>/h2>If your company does residential landscape pest control, your employees should be trained to know what to do when they encounter a vegetable garden, or fruit or nut trees in a yard (Figure 1). Their training should include how to answer a customer's questions about the safety of their pesticides around vegetables or herbs. Talking to a customer about the edible plants in their garden so you don't accidentally spray their plants might save that account from subsequent cancellation.
Is it appropriate for a technician to recommend that a resident simply wash their vegetables after having their yard treated for say, mosquitoes, or should the vegetables be thrown away? What about a perimeter spray around the home? The answer to these questions depends on whether the plants were directly exposed to the sprayed pesticide and what the product label says about proximity to edible crops.
Insecticides used for perimeter sprays and mosquito control generally don't allow application to edible plants. For example, the Suspend Polyzone label states “do not apply this product to edible crops.” The Termidor SC label says, “DO NOT treat within a distance of one foot out from the drip line of edible plants. DO NOT treat fruit-bearing or nut-bearing trees.” Some product labels make no mention of vegetables or edible crops at all. If application on edible plants is not explicitly mentioned, it is not allowed.
Will pesticides make a plant toxic?
Many insecticides, including some common active ingredients familiar to urban pesticide applicators, are used legally on agricultural crops. This is allowed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) only if that pesticide has been granted a tolerance for a given crop, and certain days-to-harvest intervals are followed. These rules work to ensure that any pesticide residues left after a pesticide application are below levels of concern for human health. The 2019 Pesticide Data Program survey by USDA shows that this system works. Out of 10,000 market food samples analyzed in the study, nearly 99% had residues well below the EPA established tolerances. More than 42% had no detectable pesticide residue.
Insecticide residues on plants are not necessarily acutely toxic, especially when label directions are followed, and adequate time passes to allow the product to naturally degrade. The products used by professional pesticide applicators may contain the same active ingredients used by farmers; but they may differ in concentration and formulation. Most importantly, insecticides used for landscapes and homes do not carry food-treatment labels, so they cannot legally be used on edible crops.
Talstar products, for example, consist of the active ingredient bifenthrin, the same active ingredient used by farmers and even home gardeners under a variety of trade names. The Talstar® P label however, says "do not use on edible crops." You must follow the label for the product you are using.
Spray contamination
If an insecticide is deliberately sprayed on an edible crop or plant, and the product is not labeled for such use, the plant would not be considered safe by EPA standards. The implication is that the whole plant, or at least the edible parts, should be thrown away. Your customer could replant unless that is prohibited by the label.
Backpack mistblowers are commonly used for applying residual insecticides in areas such as mosquito resting sites; but mists should be applied carefully to avoid drift onto fruit and nut trees and vegetable gardens.
Labels generally do not, however, prohibit use of these products in the vicinity of a vegetable garden. Take care to keep sprays directed away from vegetable gardens, so that any incidental drift from nearby spraying does not land on edible plants. Thermal foggers and ULV applications used nearby should leave insignificant residues if the application orifices are always directed away from edible plants.
Applicators should always be aware of weather conditions and the locations of edible plants. If wind is blowing toward a garden, upwind applications should be avoided.
What should you do if a fruit, nut, vegetable, or herb is accidentally sprayed? Notify the customer that an accidental spray contamination has occurred. Annual plants should be pulled. For both annual and perennial plants, the produce must be discarded by the customer and not eaten.
Systemic insecticides
Some insecticides are "systemic," meaning they have enough water solubility to be taken up by plant roots and translocated to other parts of the plant. Although the EPA allows some systemic insecticides on crops, in general systemics are not labeled for use on food crops because they can leave residues in edible plant tissues that do not quickly degrade.
Insecticides containing neonicotinoids and acephate are examples of professional grade insecticides that may be systemic in plants. These include products like Premise, Alpine, Tandem, Transport, Temprid, Orthene and others. Herbs and other root or leafy vegetables exposed to systemic insecticides should be considered contaminated for the season and should not be consumed.
Some termiticides can also be systemic in plants, leading to concerns about vegetable gardens and fruit trees planted next to homes treated for termites. Fipronil, for example, is slightly systemic in some plants; and the Termidor SC label says not to apply around edible plants. The label does not say explicitly how far away an edible plant must be, although the Premise Pro label (whose active ingredient, imidacloprid, is much more water soluble) is more specific. It says to "not treat within a distance of one foot out from the drip line of edible plants." The Premise instruction is probably a good, conservative guidelines for all termiticides. Keep the outermost leaves of garden plants at least a foot away from any soil-applied termiticide.
Washing Crops
A concerned customer whose nearby yard or house perimeter has been treated with an insecticide spray should consider washing their vegetables or other harvested edibles. Washing is a good idea whether p
esticides have been used or not. The best washing technique is to gently rub off any dirt while holding the produce under running water. This is a great way to remove dust, microorganisms, and any traces of pesticides from vegetable and fruit surfaces.
Would you recognize an edible plant?
Can you and your technicians and applicators tell basil from begonia, mint from marigold, or pear from poplar? Applicators following label directions around a home needs to be aware of what plants are present. You don't have to be a botanist or know all the local tree species; but you should recognize the most common fruit and nut trees, herbs, and vegetables (Figure 2).
When visiting a residence for the first time, ask your customer if they have any herbs, fruit trees, nut trees, or vegetables. Gardeners may plant edible plants within flower gardens, so they might have a basil plant or a tomato plant growing among the daisies. Assume your customers don't use pesticides in their vegetable garden and avoid these areas accordingly.
Your customers will appreciate any extra consideration you give to their edible garden plants. Treat them well and they might even greet you at the door with a big bag of zucchini!
Based on the article “Bugs and basil: Insecticides and veggies don't always mix” by Dr. Mike Merchant, Texas AgriLife Extension at https://insectsinthecity.blogspot.com/2018/08/pesticides-and-veggie-gardens.html
[Originally featured in the Fall 2021 edition of the Green Bulletin Newsletter for structural and landscape pest professionals.]
/span>/span>/h2>/h2>/h2>/h2>/h2>- Author: Ben Faber
![spray machines spray machines](/blogs/blogcore/blogfiles/69029.jpg)
- Author: Ben Faber
Dr. Peter Ako Larbi is a Cooperative Extension Specialist in agricultural engineering with UC ANR. As part of his research and extension program, his focus is on developing and promoting best practices for safe, economical, and environmentally sound pesticide application with reduced environmental risks. He is based at the Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center in Parlier.
Prior to joining ANR, Dr. Larbi had been an Assistant Professor of Agricultural Systems Technology in the College of Agriculture at Arkansas State University since 2014. He developed an integrated teaching and research program related to agricultural systems technology; developed and managed research in precision agriculture, agricultural machinery systems, remote sensing and sensor technology; and provided service to the university, college, local community and general scientific community. He held a joint appointment in the Division of Agriculture at University of Arkansas.
From 2012 to 2014, Dr. Larbi was a postdoctoral research associate at the Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems at Washington State University. From 2011 to 2012, he was a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Florida Citrus Research and Education Center.
Larbi earned a Ph.D. in agricultural and biological engineering from University of Florida and a M.Sc. and a B.Sc. in agricultural engineering from Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology in Kumasi, Ghana.
Dr. Larbi invites you to kindly take the following needs assessment survey to help him assess outreach, education, and training needs in pesticide spray application to better plan and implement a program that serves the people of California well:
https://ucdavis.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0qvaddZ6Se5QIrr
Please contact him at palarbi@ucanr.edu if you need further information. Thank you very much for your assistance.
![citrus spray blast citrus spray blast](/blogs/blogcore/blogfiles/58231.jpg)
- Author: Ben Faber
7th VENTURA COUNTY SPRAY SAFE EVENT
MARCH 20, 2018
VENTURA COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS
I. Registration (7:30–8:30 a.m.)
II. Opening Session (8:30–8:55 a.m.)
1. Welcoming Remarks and Introductions — Brian Benchwick, Chairman, Ventura County Spray Safe Planning Committee
2. Ventura County Spray Safe Overview — John Krist, Chief Executive Officer, Farm Bureau of Ventura County
3. The Importance and Value of Compliance — Eric Lauritzen, Policy Advisor, California Department of Pesticide Regulation
III. Morning Speakers (8:55–10:10 a.m.)
- How Water Quality Regulations Address Pesticide Use and Safety— Jenny Newman, TMDL Unit Chief, Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
- Understanding the Pesticide Registration Process — Debbie Stubbs, Regulatory Product Manager, Syngenta Crop Protection
- Protecting Schools Near Farms — Colleen Robertson, Principal, Somis School
IV. Station Training Sessions(10:15 – 11:50 a.m.) Attendees will be divided into four groups, which will rotate through the stations, with 20 minutes per station and 5 minutes of move time per rotation.
1. Improving Water Quality Through Pesticide BMPs — Nancy Broschart, Farm Bureau
2. Drift Avoidance and Safety — Kevin Miskel, Aspen Helicopters; Danny Pereira, Rio Farms
3. Spray Rig Calibration — Marianna Castiaux, California Strawberry Commission
4. Field Inspection and Worker Safety Compliance — County Agricultural Commissioner
V. Buffet Lunch (11:50 a.m. – 12:45 p.m.) — Marshall's Bodacious BBQ
VI. Closing Session (12:45 – 1:30 p.m.)
1. Speaker Introductions — Brian Benchwick
2. Statewide Regulatory Perspectives and Issues — Brian Leahy, Director, California Department of Pesticide Regulation
3. Closing Remarks — William Terry, Vegetable Grower, Terry Farms
Attendance is free, but advance registration is
required. Fax (805) 987-3874 or email
spraysafe@farmbureauvc.com
/h2>/h2>/h2>/h2>/h2>/h2>/h2>/h2>/h2>/h2>/h1>/h2>/h2>/h2>/h1>/h1>
![spray safe spray safe](/blogs/blogcore/blogfiles/51033.jpg)