- Author: Luis Espino
Organic Rice: Current Research and Future Needs
July 26, 9:00 am – 2:00 pm
UCCE Sutter-Yuba Conference Room
142 Garden Hwy
Yuba City, CA 95991
In this meeting, the UCCE rice team will present general guidelines and recent research that can help California organic rice growers improve management. Participants will be given the opportunity to provide input about the most pressing challenges organic growers face that can be addressed through research and outreach. Come prepared to share!
Lunch will be provided. There is no fee to attend but registration is needed to get a head count for lunch. Register at https://ucanr.edu/organic or email laespino@ucanr.edu with the number of participants in your party.
Program
8:30 Registration
9:00 Welcome and Introduction
9:05 Agronomics and Fertility Management - Bruce Linquist, UC Davis
9:45 Arthropod and Disease Management - Luis Espino, UCCE and Ian Grettenberger, UC Davis
10:15 Weed Management - Whitney Brim-DeForest, UCCE and Kassim Al-Khatib, UC Davis
11:00 Costs of Production – Luis Espino, UCCE and Alvaro Durand-Morat, UA
12:00 Lunch
1:00 Costs of Production Discussion Continued
2:00 Adjourn
For more information contact Luis Espino at 530-635-6234 or laespino@ucanr.edu
Meeting sponsored by UCCE and the UC Organic Agriculture Institute
****1.5 DPR CE hours in the Other category****
In lieu of flowers, memorial gifts may be made through this website to support Faith Lutheran Church/Lutheran World Relief, to educate female plant geneticists, or to support young female hunters. https://gofund.me/93f4c931
Faith Lutheran is located at 667 East First Avenue, Chico, CA 95926.
Attached is a brief biography on Dr. Johnson.
Carl William Johnson
- Author: Bruce A Linquist
We are trying something this year that we have not ever tried. We are drill seeding rice into fields that have not been tilled this season. Why are we doing this? It is one way to save considerable amounts of irrigation water. We estimate that up to 0.5 ac ft/ac of water could be saved. Water savings are due to using existing soil moisture (from the winter/spring rains) and limiting the evaporation of water during the first month of the season by not having the field flooded. Other potential benefits include reduced tillage costs, the ability to plant early, and avoiding tadpole shrimp and midge injury.
We are looking at four different seedbeds to NT drill seed into.
- Fallow stale-seedbed (FSS): field was fallowed in 2022. It was disked and leveled then. It was not flooded during the winter. No tillage was done during 2023.
- No-till. We have three strict NT treatments. Rice was grown in 2022. After harvesting (harvested to limit ruts), the straw in the field was subjected to one of three treatments:
- Chopped (NT-Chop)
- Half removed to simulate baling (NT-Remove)
- Burned (NT-Burn)
The no-till fields were all winter flooded.
At the time of planting:
On May 2 the fields were all planted with a Great Plains no-till drill seeder (see above) at a rate of 150 lb seed/ac.
There were a lot of winter weeds in the NT-Burn and FSS treatments (with the wet spring we got more winter weeds than normal). While we tried to get rid of them by spraying glyphosate before drilling, many were tolerant. In the NT-Chop and NT-Remove treatments there were little to no weeds.
Soil moisture varied tremendously between the different treatments. There was a lot of moisture under the NT-Chop straw (too much for optimal planting). In the FSS and NT-Burn the soil was the driest with soil moisture at about 2 inches below the soil surface. We probably could have planted to moisture in the NT-Chop but due to the layout of the experiment, we gave all treatments an initial irrigation flush after planting on May 4 and the flush was drained on May 8.
We did not apply any herbicide at planting (either before or after the flush).
Just before a permanent flood:
We did not apply any irrigation water after the initial flush at planting until June 2 when we applied the permanent flood. The rice was at the 4-leaf stage by this time. We got a good stand in all treatments. The stand was lowest in the NT-Chop treatment but still good. The soil moisture in the NT-Burn and FSS was starting to dry out but we did not see any moisture stress. In the NT-Chop treatment, there was still a lot of moisture beneath the straw mat. The winter weeds were still present but we saw very few other weeds coming up. Just before permanent flood, we applied urea and herbicides (Prowl, Clincher and Propanil).
After the permanent flood, the plants almost doubled in height in the first few days and were well above the water line. As one can see in the pictures, the winter weeds persisted into the permanent flood. However, they did not appear to affect the stand of rice; but we will see as time progresses.
We are encouraged by what we are seeing early on. Obviously, we still have a long way to go. This year we are looking at potential water savings, weed problems and their management, and fertility management in these systems. If you are interested in this research and would like to visit the site, please let us know and we can try to arrange something. We will highlight this research at the Annual Rice Field Day at the end of August.
- Author: Luis Espino
The 2023 Rice Production Manual is available for download here. The Manual was produced in association with the 2023 Rice Production Workshop; it describes the principles of rice production based on research conducted in the rice production areas of California.
- Author: Luis Espino
I recently visited a field that had quite a bit of rice seed midge injury. In this case, the seedlings that were not injured were almost at the one leaf stage, and one could observe quite a few seeds still in the soil surface. Close inspection of these seeds showed that they had been hollowed out by rice seed midge. Some midge casings were observed as well. Later, I got some reports of more fields injured by rice seed midge in the Colusa area.
Seed injured by rice seed midge |
Rice seed midge casings and injured seed |
Rice seed midge has been considered a pest of rice for many years. However, it has been an infrequent pest. The thought was that pyrethroid insecticides controlled it. Nevertheless, in the past three years, I have seen considerable injury in fields that had been treated with a pyrethroid.
Ian Grettenberger, UC Davis Entomology Specialist, collected some midges from the field I mentioned above and exposed them to a full rate of a pyrethroid or an insect growth regulator for 48 hours. The larvae survived. We are not sure if the survival is due to low susceptibility or resistance build-up to the pesticides. Ian started doing some pesticide work last year but the results were not clear cut. More work is going to be necessary to improve on the management of this pest. Let us know if you have seen issues with seed midge recently so we can have a better idea of the current importance of this insect.
/table>