- Author: Oleg Daugovish
- Author: Steve Fennimore
- Author: Mark Bolda
A response to the question posed to us concerning how soon one should be applying water to Chateau (flumioxazin) sprayed in the furrows for weed control in strawberry. The label says that this herbicide can be applied at a minimum of 30 days before transplant of strawberries, but it doesn’t seem to specify how soon to apply the water after application.
Probably the sooner you apply water to furrows the better, but in a study run by Oleg in Ventura County, Chateau was applied to furrows about a month before sprinklers were turned on and the herbicide was effective against several broadleaf weed species, including wind-dispersed weed seed that landed in furrows after application.
Chateau does not degrade and just remains on soil surface, provided furrows stay dry during that time. If the furrows get wetted enough to germinate weeds the herbicide will be sufficiently activated as well.
The residual efficacy of Chateau is diminished over time, but you can reapply it to furrows if needed – there is no co-distillation, so as long as there is no drift, strawberry plants should be safe. You can extend the control by reapplying it with shielded sprayer in-season as long as the strawberry plants do not have flowers and fruit (which is soon in Southern California but quite a bit later here in Watsonville and Salinas) and you do not intentionally overspray the beds (first photo below) .
Also, thinking about traffic going through the field after application, specifically the wheels of tractors moving through the furrows, it does create some breaks in the barrier that the initial application of Chateau has formed. It might be interesting to do a little experiment with different levels of disturbance post-application to see how much efficacy really is affected. However, remember that Chateau can be reapplied later on in December and January in the furrows in order to get better control since it will be catching multiple flushes and cohorts of weeds from both the seed bank and wind dispersal.
UC IPM guidelines for Chateau in strawberry are available at:
www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/r734700411.html
The use of flumioxazin (Chateau) is extensively written about in this article. Before this or any other product, check with your local Agricultural Commissioner's Office and consult product labels for current status of product registration, restrictions, and use information.
- Author: Mark Bolda
- Author: Monise Sheehan
This is simply a summary of one year of biological fungicide work in strawberries in 2012-2013 and should not be understood as a recommendation to use any of these products. This investigation is will continue into 2013-2014 and will serve to confirm and adjust the work here.
Introduction: A number of biological fungicides registered for use in strawberries have not been thoroughly tested through empirical studies to give guidance to growers on their efficacy and use.
Materials and Methods:
Table 1 below is an outline of materials tested in 2012-2013.
The field involved in the study was organically farmed and had a tested infestation of Verticillium at the average level of 25 microsclerotia per treatment replicate. Grower standard was managed as per grower practice, that is to say normal irrigation, fertility and pest management practices were applied. This grower standard did not include any sort of biological fungicide either by dip or injection through the drip tape during the season.
Plot was replicated three times and each replicate consisted of at one bed of 180 feet in length.
Application of the materials took place as indicated in the table below:
Table 1. List of treatments.
Test Material |
Application/ Use |
Dazitol |
6.25 gal/A applied 3-5 days prior to planting |
Biotam + Serenade Soil |
5 lbs/A pre-plant application 3-5 days prior to planting followed by Serenade Soil @ 4 qt/A (10 days after planting, and then Serenade Soil @ 2 qt /A applied monthly after planting. Second application of Biotam 5 lbs/A and Serenade Soil @ 4 qt/A in February. |
Serenade Soil |
Serenade Soil @ 4 qt/A (10 days after planting, and then Serenade Soil @ 2 qt /A applied monthly after planting. |
Serenade Soil |
Serenade Soil @ 4 qt/A (10 days after planting, and then Serenade Soil @ 4 qt /A applied every 60 days after planting. |
Actinovate Rate 1 |
(1) 3 oz per 100 gal root dip at planting. (2) followed by 6 oz/A pre-plant in drip tape (3) followed by 3 oz/A every 30 days in drip tape
|
Actinovate Rate 2 |
(1) 3 oz per 100 gal root dip at planting. (2) followed by 6 oz/A pre-plant in drip tape (3) followed by 6 oz/A every 30 days in drip tape
|
SoilGuard |
Apply at planting as root dip or planting furrow drench at 5 lb/ A and again through drip tape every 4-6 weeks through harvest. |
Double Nickel 55 |
Apply at planting at 1 qt /A (1/2 lb/A powder) as root dip or planting furrow drench and again through drip tape every 4-6 weeks through harvest. |
Terra Clean 5.0 |
(1) 128 fl oz/100 gal drench (2) 2 gal/A drip applied at planting (3) 1 gal/A drip applied 10 days post plant and 28 days post plant (4) 1 gal/A drip applied 60, 90 and 120 days post plant |
Terra Clean 5.0 + Serenade Soil |
(1) 128 fl oz Terra Clean /100 gal drench + Serenade Soil @ 6 qt/ A soil drench (2) 2 gal/A Terra Clean drip applied at planting followed by SS @ 3 qt /A (3) 1 gal/A Terra Clean + 3 qt /A Serenade Soil drip applied 10 days post plant and 28 days post plant (4) 1 gal/A Terra Clean + Serenade Soil @ 3 qt/ A drip applied 60, 90 and 120 days post plant |
Tainio |
(1) Spectrum @ 50 g / A + Pepzyme C @ 12.5 oz/A 2- 3 days preplant (2) Biogenesis @ 1 lb/A+ Pepzyme C @ 12.5 oz/A as plant dip (3) Pepzyme C monthly through drip tape (4) Micro 5000 @ 2.66 oz/A at 2 leaf stage foliar |
Plant dips were made by suspending the requested rate of fungicide in approximately twenty gallons of water and submerging and soaking about a half a box of strawberry transplants (about 500 plants) thoroughly and then distributing to planting crews for transplant. Note that in the case of the two Actinovate treatments, plants were held for one night to prior to transplant, ostensibly to establish the organism on the plant roots.
Drip applications were made with a portable pump injecting each fungicide. Each application normally was preceded by filling the drip tape with clear water, injecting the mix and then further pumping in clear water to make sure the fungicide had moved well out of the drip tape.
Application dates:
Preplant application – 11/3/2012
Dazitol
Terra Clean 5.0
Terraclean 5.0 + Serenade Soil
Tainio Spectrum + Pepzyme C
Biotam
Root dip + one overnight hold – 11/7/2012 (planted November 8)
Actinovate rate 1
Actinovate rate 2
Root dip and immediate planting – 11/8/2012
Double Nickel 55
Soilguard
Biogenesis + Pepzyme C
10 days post – plant – 11/20/2012
Serenade 4 qt
Serenade 2 qt
Monthly applications (12/11/2012, 1/16/2013, 2/26/2013, 3/27/2013, 4/30/2013, and 6/13/2013)
Terra Clean 5.0
Terraclean 5.0 + Serenade Soil
Tainio Spectrum + Pepzyme C
Serenade 4 qt
Serendade 2 qt
Actinovate rate 1
Actinovate rate 2
Double Nickel 55
Biotam applied 2/26/2013; Serenade 4 qt per acre applied other dates in treatment
Soilguard
Several dying plants from different areas of the test plots were sampled in July to confirm that Verticillium was the cause of plant death.
As a gauge of plant vigor from each treatment, strawberry plant diameters were measured February 13, and April 13. Measurements were in centimeters and from twenty plants in each plot.
With the beginning of fruit ripening, fruit harvest was done weekly in each treatment replicate. On each pick date, fruit from each plot was weighed and counted.
Results:
|
Plant D cm 2/13/2013 |
Plant D cm 4/13/2013 |
Yield to 5/14/2013 |
April Total Yield g/plot |
Actinovate r1 |
14.05a |
16.25a |
3894.00a |
2175.00ab |
Actinovate r2 |
13.70ab |
16.42a |
3818.33a |
2428.00a |
Biotam |
11.47b |
15.77a |
2176.67b |
1377.00b |
Dazitol |
11.70b |
17.70a |
2505.67ab |
1568.00ab |
Double Nickel 55 |
12.65ab |
15.92a |
3084.00ab |
1637.00ab |
Serenade 4 qt +2 qt |
11.57b |
16.65a |
2853.00ab |
1471.67b |
Serenade 4 qt +4 qt |
12.42ab |
16.02a |
2621.00ab |
1459.67b |
Soilguard |
11.85b |
16.78a |
2993.33ab |
1652.33ab |
Tainio |
12.93ab |
16.95a |
3454.00ab |
2075.33ab |
Terraclean |
11.50b |
16.78a |
2284.00b |
1406.67b |
Terraclean + Serenade |
12.47ab |
17.11a |
2656.33ab |
1559.67ab |
Untreated grower standard |
11.70b |
17.90a |
2145.00b |
1189.00b |
Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)
|
May Total Yield g/plot |
June Total Yield g/plot |
July Total Yield g/plot |
Aug Total Yield g/plot |
Total Yield g/plot |
Actinovate r1 |
3741.67a |
2791.00a |
1902.33a |
140.64a |
16820.67a |
Actinovate r2 |
3069.67a |
3237.67a |
2812.33a |
149.35a |
17201.34a |
Biotam |
2254.00a |
3251.33a |
3402.00a |
503.14a |
14468.33a |
Dazitol |
2514.67a |
3075.33a |
3049.33a |
269.16a |
14625.00a |
Double Nickel 55 |
3038.67a |
2837.67a |
2573.67a |
203.64a |
15052.67a |
Serenade 4 qt +2 qt |
3244.67a |
3287.00a |
3623.67a |
371.49a |
16887.67a |
Serenade 4 qt +4 qt |
2959.67a |
3617.67a |
3236.33a |
362.02a |
16157.00a |
Soilguard |
3212.33a |
3331.67a |
2887.00a |
359.45a |
16352.33a |
Tainio |
3409.00a |
3687.33a |
3190.33a |
170.27a |
18145.00a |
Terraclean |
2496.67a |
2997.00a |
2750.00a |
125.01a |
13681.33a |
Terraclean + Serenade |
2544.00a |
2810.00a |
2230.00a |
191.78a |
13454.33a |
Untreated grower standard |
2812.00a |
4019.33a |
3800.00a |
306.15a |
16150.33a |
Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)
Plant diameters measured on February 13, 2013, were significantly larger in the low rate of Actinovate than the other treatments with the exception of the high rate of Actinovate, Tainio and Double Nickel 55.
Both rates of Actinovate realized higher fruit yield than all other treatments except for the Dazitol, in cumulative fruit yield, which included six weekly harvests, up to May 14, 2013. No further differences were realized between May and August.
As noted above, this field has a very high infestation of Verticillium and all plots began to experience pronounced plant dieback in June, with some 60-80% remaining alive or declining and by end of July, nearly all plants in all replicate plots had died. There was a trend for plants which had produced larger amounts of fruit in April and May to experience lesser fruit production lesser vigor and earlier dieback as the season progressed.
Conclusion
The results of this trial are encouraging. In the early part of the season up through the middle of May, several treatments had significantly higher amounts of fruits harvested than the grower standard. Nonetheless, none of the treatments provided sufficient protection to the plants to prevent an almost complete die out of the plants by August, effectively ending the season.
- Author: Mark Bolda
It’s not easy for a farmer who is used to selling direct at farmers markets, a roadside stand, or to a processor to make the big step into selling boxed and labeled product to wholesale and other buyers. Yet these buyers really want to meet small farmers so they can serve the rapidly expanding market for locally grown food. The University of California Cooperative Extension offices in Santa Cruz and Santa Clara Counties, along with the Agricultural Sustainability Institute at UC Davis are planning to connect these farmers and buyers from the San Francisco Bay Area during a bus tour on Tuesday, November 5.
Farmers who want to join the bus tour need to pre-register by contacting UC Cooperative Extension Santa Cruz County at telephone (831) 763-8040; email cesantacruz@ucdavis.edu or by stopping by the office at 1432 Freedom Blvd in Watsonville. There is a $20 registration fee, which is fully refundable upon boarding the bus.
The day long tour will leave UC Cooperative Extension in Watsonville at dawn, pick up more growers in San Martin on the way to San Francisco, then tour the San Francisco Produce Market and see different kinds of buyers in the area. The farmers will also visit an independent retailer who buys direct as well as a foodservice or restaurant buyer. The tour will be a “workshop on wheels” where participants will learn about food safety requirements and credit and loan opportunities. Farm Credit banks, which have provided support for the tours, will have a representative on board to discuss financing options.
Link to further information and registration is provided here:
http://cesantacruz.ucanr.edu/files/174315.pdf
- Author: Mark Bolda
The new edition of "Sample Costs to Establish and Produce Fresh Market Blackberries Study" is now available from UCCE.
http://coststudies.ucdavis.edu/files//2013/09/30/blackberrycc2013.pdf
This is another great cost and return study in berries authored by Laura Tourte, Rich De Moura, Karen Klonsky, and yours truly.
We certainly weren't in alone in writing this study, and this work could not have been accomplished without the substantial input and contributions from local blackberry growers - thank you all!
- Author: Mark Bolda
The UC Vegetable Research & Information Center (VRIC) will sponsor the UC Soil Fertility Short Courseon Wednesday, October 23, 2013 at the Buehler Alumni & Visitor Center, UC Davis. The short course will focus on the practical aspects of soil fertility management and topics will include soil testing, interpretation of laboratory soil test results, comparing fertilizer sources, developing crop nutrient management plans, and fertilizer management and environmental protection. The content will be geared toward commercial scale production, and will assume a general knowledge of soil science; this course is not appropriate for home gardeners.
The program is intended for growers, certified crop advisers (CCA), pest control advisers, government agency personnel, and others involved in fertility management planning. Take advantage of the early-bird registration fee ($160.) The fee goes up on Oct. 4 to $190. The registration fee includes lunch, refreshments and study materials. UC Farm Advisors can attend at the special rate of $95. Enrollment limited to 70 attendees.
Cooperative Extension specialists Tim Hartz (vegetable crops) and Stu Pettygrove (soils) are the instructors.
The course is approved for California CCA continuing education credits. No DPR credit available for this course.
More information, visit the VRIC website (http://vric.ucdavis.edu).