Shrubs in a post-fire mixed conifer forest, with burned trees in the background.
Forestry Research and Outreach
Document

Post-Fire Factsheet: A guide to photo monitoring to track change

Release date: March 2026

Reviewed by: UCCE Post-Fire Forest Resilience program team

Prepared by: Nic Dutch

 

Effective land management depends on understanding how forest conditions are changing over time. Documenting environmental conditions can help managers track landscape responses over time, both to management interventions and to large disturbances like wildfire. Memory and written records often do not capture the subtle, gradual transformations that occur across landscapes. Photos can be a useful tool to help record these changes.

Photo monitoring is a systematic strategy that involves taking repeated photographs at established points to create a record of landscape conditions over time. The resulting series of photos allows for both qualitative and quantitative monitoring of environmental change, including shifts in vegetation communities, wildlife habitat, erosion and treatment effectiveness. Photographs can help record baseline conditions, track restoration trajectories, document compliance with regulations, and support decision making. Photos can be analyzed using simple visual comparison or with advanced image processing techniques. 

 

Define Monitoring Objectives

Successful photo monitoring requires clearly defined objectives to help determine where, when and how often to take photos. Without specific objectives, photos may not record the changes you are trying to track. Common monitoring objectives include:

Vegetation change: Documenting plant community dynamics including invasive species spread.

Disturbance recovery: Tracking recovery from wildfires, floods, or drought stress.

Physical processes: Monitoring erosion rates, channel migration, or soil surface conditions.

Infrastructure: Documenting fence lines, road conditions, or functionality of culverts and bridges.

Treatment effectiveness: Evaluating effects of mastication, prescribed burning, thinning, or herbicide on vegetation.

 

Create a Standardized Protocol

A protocol is a method of collecting information in a consistent, repeatable and clear way. It’s important to write down the specifics of your photo monitoring plan so it can be repeated later. Each monitoring objective may require a different protocol. Photos of vegetation need to be taken in the right season to capture plants’ stages of development. Photos of erosion are often taken after storms. To capture the effectiveness of treatments, photos taken before the management intervention will need to be compared with photos in the same location at regular follow-up intervals. Include information in your protocol on the type of camera, when to photograph, in what season, how frequently, and how long you intend to monitor. For more information, see UCANR Photo-Monitoring for Better Land Use Planning and Assessment.

 

Image
Vegetation change and burn severity following the Chips and Angora fires.
Image 1: Blue boxes highlight a witness element for reference in each image. First row documents the vegetation change and burn severity following the Chips Fire in 2012. Second row captures changes in riparian vegetation in a drainage following the 2007 Angora fire. Photos by Ryan Tompkins and Daylin Wade, UC ANR.

Establishing Photo and Camera Points

A camera point is a location where a camera is set up to take photos. A photo point specifies the camera point where the photo is taken, as well as the orientation of the camera. Multiple photo points can be established from one camera point. Make sure that the chosen photo and camera points will capture the anticipated changes. Consider the following (Hall, 2002).

1) Identify a suitable site. Select elements in the landscape for monitoring. For example, a hillside with a drainage to evaluate soil erosion or an area with a vantage point to track growth of planted seedlings. 

2) Establish camera points and orient photo points. Select camera points that capture the full scope of the landscape changes you will be monitoring. The best ones allow for multiple photo points, i.e. angles, to be photographed. It’s important to anticipate how vegetation may grow so that your future photos are not obstructed by regrowing trees. In some situations, taking a photo in predetermined directions, such as a cardinal direction, will limit bias.

3) Mark photo and camera points. Photo and camera points should be marked r with a physical marker (rebar, plot pole) and GPS location for future relocation (See UCANR Mapping Forest Features for more info.

4) Identify a witness element. Choose a unique tree, fence post, culvert, etc., that helps to locate the monitoring area and the camera and photo points. Write down the distance and direction from the witness element to the camera point.

 

Data Processing and Analysis

Store images using consistent file naming and organization. If using a tablet or smartphone, consider using Survey123 APP or Avenza to create databases or maps that integrate photos, GPS data, and notes. Depending on the methodology (See table below), detecting change with photos involves employing comparison like before-and-after analysis or image processing tools.


Table: Comparison of Photo Monitoring Equipment

Method

Overview

Applications

Advantages

Considerations

Digital Single Lense Reflex (DSLR) Cameras

High-resolution images, control over aperture, shutter speed, & light (ISO)

Detailed studies requiring high image quality

Superior image quality / versatility; able to use interchangeable lenses

Bulkier and requires knowledge of manual camera settings

Smartphone/

Tablet Cameras

High accessibility, convenience, and improving image quality depending on device

Quick documentation, connections to applications

Easy to use, can capture high-quality images; equipped with GPS for precise location tagging

Limited battery life, storage capacity, images may have lower resolution

360-Photos

Captures panoramic images that cover the entire surrounding area from a single point

Large areas such as forests or open fields

Provides a holistic view, offering more context than traditional photos

Requires specialized cameras, may involve more complex data processing

UAV (drone) Imagery

Captures images from above, covering large areas quickly and efficiently.

Large areas, unreachable by foot

Provides high-resolution, creates imagery for geospatial analysis

Highest-cost equipment and expertise in drone operation and regulations


Works Cited

Hall, FC. (2002). Ground-based photographic monitoring. USDA Forest Service PNW-GTR-503. Portland, OR.

McDougald, N, W Frost, and D Dudley. (2003). Photo-Monitoring for Better Land Use Planning & Assessment.

Satomi, R, C Eggleton & V. Butsic. (2024).Forest Stewardship Series 26: Mapping Forest Features. 


Find the printable version of this fact sheet below. Note that the pdf is for print purposes ONLY.