ANR Employees
University of California
ANR Employees

Announcements

President Drake approves 2024-25 salary increases for policy-covered employees

Dear Colleagues,

Despite this being a very challenging budget year for California, the Legislature passed and the governor has now signed a final state budget for the 2024-25 fiscal year, which does not cut funding for UC. We are deeply grateful for the steadfast support of the governor, and our elected officials, for higher education in California.

With the budget signed, President Drake has formally approved the 2024-25 systemwide salary program. The 4.2% salary increase for policy-covered staff and academic appointees at all locations recognizes the extraordinary efforts of employees during this past year. Pay increases will take effect on July 1, 2024, for employees who are paid monthly and on June 23 for those who are paid bi-weekly.

Thank you for your dedication and passion for our mission of improving the lives all Californians. As we head into the 4th of July holiday, I hope you can enjoy some quality time with friends and family.  

Best wishes, Glenda

Glenda Humiston
Vice President

Posted on Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 8:00 AM
Tags: Budget (34), June 2024 (17), salaries (1)

Duncan’s research ‘blew up preconceived ideas,’ improved almond, peach, grape production

 

“I am most proud of the trust I have developed with the growers and other clientele,” said Roger Duncan, who retired as UC Cooperative Extension pomology farm advisor in Stanislaus County.

Roger Duncan, UCCE farm advisor in Stanislaus County, retires after 36 years

For more than three decades, tree fruit and nut growers have depended on the advice of Roger Duncan, UC Cooperative Extension pomology farm advisor in Stanislaus County, to improve their production practices. Duncan, whose research and extension program focused on almonds, peaches, grapes and other tree crops, retired July 1.

“Roger Duncan has been an extraordinarily relevant researcher for the predominant crops in Stanislaus County,” said Rep. John Duarte, owner of Duarte Nursery in Hughson. “His research has encompassed rootstock and variety selection, tree spacing, chemical inputs and spraying, fertilizers, pruning and replanting amongst other projects.”

Duncan began working for UC ANR in 1988 as a field assistant to Integrated Pest Management advisor Jim Stapleton after earning a master's degree in plant science and plant pathology from Fresno State and a bachelor's degree in the same subjects from UC Davis. In 1990, he became a UC Cooperative Extension in pomology farm advisor in Stanislaus County.

During Duncan's tenure, the planted acreage of tree and vine crops has tripled in Stanislaus County to nearly 1,900 farms on over 230,000 acres. His research has helped to improve production efficiency through improved rootstocks, crop varieties and production practices.

“Roger provides growers with resources and tools on nutrition, sprays, nutrient deficiencies, calendars, costs, pest management and other horticultural practices,” Duarte said. “His work has had significant impact on the productivity and quality of almonds, peaches and grapes. Breeders, universities, nurseries, growers and marketers have all gained from the wisdom and dedication of Roger Duncan.”

Growing up in Modesto, Duncan wasn't raised on a farm. “I had friends whose families farmed orchard crops, so I had some exposure,” he said. “I caught the Extension bug while working as a summer intern for thepomologyadvisors in theStanislaus CountyUCCE office after I graduated with my B.S. That is what inspired me to return to school with the goal of being apomology farmadvisor.”

Duncan hosted several field events each year. For over 20 years, he coordinated the annual North San Joaquin Valley Almond Days, which attracted more than 500 attendees.

Reducing production costs

To help growers lower production costs, Duncan introduced orchard practices aimed at reducing hand labor and other inputs. As a result of his research, minimal pruning has become the norm in California almond production, reducing input costs and carbon output and increasing yield. He also improved monitoring and management techniques of established and invasive diseases and insect pests.

“The practical applications Roger brings to the grower community are invaluable,” said Mel Machado, Blue Diamond Almonds vice president for member relations and Stanislaus County almond grower. “His minimal pruning study stood growers on their heads. People had preconceived ideas about pruning. He blew that up. His research showed that after you get the tree's frame, all you need to remove are the dead and occluded branches. With the market depressed, we needed to cut costs. He said, ‘You don't need pruning.' Now I'm growing bushes.”

Art Bowman, a crop adviser with Salida Ag Chem, agreed that Duncan's pruning research had an impact. “Roger's pruning trial that lasted over 20 years was a much-discussed subject among growers,” Bowman said. “Growers' pruning practices definitely changed due to Roger's research, with early emphasis on structural development and, later in the tree's life, concentrating on tree accessibility and deadwood removal.”

In 1990, when Duncan joined UC Cooperative Extension, California had 408,700 acres of almonds, according to the California Agricultural Statistics Service. Now the state has over 1.5 million acres of almonds.

About 75% of the farms Duncan has served have 40 acres or less, farmed by “small” or “part-time” farmers, who needed to learn basic horticulture and pest management. Stanislaus County also is home to some very large, sophisticated growers, who Duncan has kept apprised of new technology.

“I believe that personal interaction offers the most memorable means of information transfer, which is why I held an average of 12-plus extension events per year, gave 18-plus extension presentations per year, and went on an average of over 75 individual farm calls per year,” Duncan said. He also provided information via videos, blogs, podcasts, radio shows, newsletters, news media and extension publications as well as commodity boards.

Along with Duncan's research, Bowman has appreciated his availability. “Roger was always ready to take a call, make orchard visits and listen to a grower's concern or problem,” he said. 

In 1997, Duncan began hosting twice monthly Tree & Vine Integrated Pest Management breakfast meetings for pest control advisers and growers to discuss current and potential pest threats. These meetings have continued for 28 years.

Duncan, left in front row, and the Tree & Vine IPM Breakfast Group won the IPM Innovator award from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation in 2016.

He speaks ‘farmer'

Machado attributes much of Duncan's success to his communication skills. “His research is scientific and he speaks ‘farmer,'” he said.

Machado gave rootstock as an example. “Roger is my rootstock resource; he knows rootstocks better than anybody,” he said. “His rootstock trial is dirt simple. There's a different rootstock every five trees. You can see walking down the row the differences in the rootstocks.”

From his field evaluations, Duncan identified a complex hybrid rootstock that is highly tolerant to ring nematode, bacterial canker and salt toxicity. He found other hybrid rootstocks that boost crop yield while reducing risk from soil chemistry and soil-borne disease challenges, enabling almonds to be grown in the marginal soils on the west side of the North San Joaquin Valley. To help growers choose the appropriate rootstock for their soil, he wrote a comprehensive ANR publication, made a video and worked with the UC Fruit & Nut Center to create an interactive rootstock comparison website.

Over the last 15 years, use of hybrid almond rootstocks has increased dramatically. Burchell Nursery now sells approximately 40% of their trees on hybrid rootstock compared to less than 5% of almond trees 15 years ago, and more than 95% of Duarte Nursery almond trees are on hybrid rootstocks, according to Duncan.

“We've worked with Roger for years, back when he didn't have a mustache and then when he had a mustache,” said Robert Longstreth, who grows almonds, walnuts and cherries.

“Roger does research in the area you need, not frivolous stuff that you don't need,” said Longstreth, who has benefited from Duncan's research on pruning, rootstocks, irrigation timing, plant nutrition and disease control. “He's thought very highly of by almond growers. When he has something to say, people listen.”

Duncan, right, shown talking with Ken Shackel, UC Davis pomologist, and Helen Dahlke, UC Davis hydrologist, in an almond orchard for a groundwater recharge project, collaborated with numerous UC ANR colleagues on research.

The UCCE farm advisor has overseen long-term trials to learn how to design and maintain an almond orchard to capture early production, maintain long-term yields and maximize profits. “In the first 17 years of the orchard design project, I increased cumulative net profits by up to $14,000 per acre, including increased yield while reducing labor and carbon inputs,” Duncan said.

Influenced by Duncan's tree-spacing research results, growers have increased almond tree density by 20% per acre statewide, leading to higher crop yields, longer-living orchards and better farm economic sustainability.

As California's expert on almond rootstocks and almond orchard design, Duncan has taught the subjects for the UC Almond Production Short Course, was lead author on the UCANR publication “Almond Rootstocks,” wrote the rootstock chapter, and co-authored the orchard design chapter of the UC Almond Production Manual. He was invited to Chile, Spain and Australia to share his expertise with growers there.

Expanded programs for kids and gardeners

In addition to being a farm advisor, Duncan served as director of UC Cooperative Extension in Stanislaus County from 2011 through 2013 and again from 2017 through 2020. As the UCCE county director, he acquired new county funding to hire a 4-H youth development program representative in 2018 to provide more learning opportunities for local, underrepresented children.

That year, he also acquired county funding to hire a full-time Master Gardener coordinator and launched the first UC Master Gardener Program in the county.

“I felt very lucky to serve as an advisor in the same county where I was born and raised,” Duncan said. “I am most proud of the trust I have developed with the growers and other clientele.”

Professional awards

Recently, Duncan's peers at UC ANR honored him with a Distinguished Service Award for his outstanding extension program, which gave growers the data and confidence to adopt orchard practices that have bumped up the productivity and economic value of California almond orchards.

The popular breakfast meetings to discuss pest management earned Duncan and his UC Cooperative Extension farm advisor colleagues the Entomological Society Award of Extension Excellence and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation's IPM Innovator Award. The California Legislature also recognized the breakfast club's commitment to sustainable pest management.

“I have a lot of respect for the other farm advisors, but Roger is at the top of the pile,” said Machado, who has served on Almond Board committees with Duncan and known him since he joined UC Cooperative Extension. “I'm going to miss him. You can absolutely count on him.”

Congressman and nurseryman Duarte added: “While he will be sorely missed by us in his role of pomology advisor for the University of California, we hope that he keeps his interest, and continues to influence the food production industry in the Central Valley.”

Posted on Monday, July 1, 2024 at 2:44 PM
Tags: June 2024 (17), Roger Duncan (2)

Statewide study identifies needs and practices of farmers to adapt to climate change in California

A recent survey of California farmers showed that 67% of the farmers agree that climate change is happening. Farmers attend a workshop about the decision support tool CalAgroClimate in Tulare.

Climate Smart Agriculture: Assessing Needs and Perceptions of California's Farmers,” published on June 14, 2024, in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, is an article based on the results of statewide survey by UC ANR scientists and their collaborators. This effort is part of the USDA-NIFA Pathways to Climate-Smart Ag project. The survey was distributed statewide and 341 farmers responded.

The findings showed that 67% of the farmers agree that climate change is happening, and 53.1% agreed that actions are required. Significantly, historically underrepresented farmers were “very concerned” about climate change-related impacts related to water resources, temperatures and natural disasters.

The study found that some farmers are currently implementing adaptation practices related to water resources management, soil health and renewable energy and are also seeking insurance and government assistance programs to enhance their resilience to climate change. Farmers also expressed “interest” and “high need” for more information on those adaptation practices to manage various challenges of farming in the current and future variable climates.

The study identified that more than half of the farmers believe the most “significant barriers” to adaptation are mainly government regulations (53.1%), followed by high input cost (46.9%), labor access/cost (35.2%), access to water (33.5%), and access to investment capital/funds (32.4%).

The needs assessment also established that farmers use climate decision-support tools (47.5%), mostly weather stations; and 51.9% indicated their interest in using online tools designed to translate climate information into forms that support production decision-making. On extension education and information access, farmers responded that they will likely attend workshops to learn about adaptation practices (60.8%).

The findings of this needs assessment are being used to develop and deliver climate smart agriculture programs for farmers and ranchers in California.

The project is led by Tapan Pathak, UC Cooperative Extension specialist in climate adaptation in agriculture based at UC Merced, as the project director. Steven Ostoja, director of the U.S. Department of Agriculture California Climate Hub, and Vikram Koundinya, UCCE evaluation specialist, serve as co-PDs, with support from Leslie Roche, UCCE rangeland management specialist; Daniele Zaccaria, UC Davis associate professor and UCCE agricultural water management specialist; and Mark Cooper, UC Davis assistant professor in community and regional development.

The article was written by a team with diverse expertise in climate and agricultural sciences, social sciences, and extension academics and evaluation experts. Authors include Samuel Ikendi, Natalia Pinzon, Koundinya, Namah Taku-Forchu, Roche, Ostoja, Lauren Parker, Zaccaria, Cooper, Jairo Diaz-Ramirez, Sonja Brodt, Mark Battany, Jhalendra Rijal and Pathak.

Reference

Ikendi, S., Pinzon, N., Koundinya, V., Taku-Forchu, N, Roche, L., Ostoja, S., Parker, L., Zaccaria, D., Cooper, M., Diaz-Ramirez, J., Brodt, S., Battany, M., Rijal, J., & Pathak, T. (2024). Climate smart agriculture: Assessing needs and perceptions of California's farmers. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, 1395547. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1395547

Posted on Friday, June 28, 2024 at 8:42 PM
  • Author: Samuel Ikendi, Tapan Pathak, Vikram Koundinya

Why become a certified California Naturalist?

California Naturalists explore fossils with geologist Ed Clifton at Point Lobos State Natural Reserve in Monterey County.

I recently came across a national forum thread on iNaturalist where someone was curious to know more about the value of becoming a “certified” naturalist. Not surprisingly there were a wide range of opinions. These ranged from supportive to skeptical to cynical. Because many of the responses came from people who have not taken a course themselves, I thought it might be valuable to share some data from people who actually completed a course – in this case the UC California Naturalist course offered by over 60 different organizations around the state, in partnership with UC ANR's Environmental Stewards program.

To summarize the forum discussion, the believers – commonly people who actually have taken a course – found that taking a course was useful for people who were new to an area, had no previous science background, or were looking for ways to connect and engage in volunteer service locally. The skeptics often cited the improbability of becoming a “master” or expert in anything after just taking a short course or the fact that a degree in many science fields would render certification unnecessary. Finally, the more cynical views suggested that certification was just another ploy to separate people from their money.

In California, our end-of-course evaluation provides some useful insight on the reasons why people pursue naturalist certification, as well as their level of satisfaction with the course. The five most commonly cited reasons for pursuing naturalist certification from over 1,000 respondents were 1) to learn more about the local environment, 2) learn about conservation issues, 3) spend time outside, 4) career development, and 5) meet people with similar interests. Securing the certification itself ranks sixth out of 10 choices and rarely is the driving factor for taking the course.

Regardless of their rationale for taking the course, 72% of those who completed the course were very satisfied with their experience and 93% were either very or somewhat satisfied. In terms of putting their experience to use, 95% of the respondents indicated that participation in the course improved their capacity to do their volunteer service and the majority indicated they plan to do more volunteer service in the coming year.

Increasing numbers of participants are looking at the course as a form of professional development and about 93% indicated that participation in the course improved their capacity to do their work or the work they would like to do in the future. Anecdotally, we find the social learning component of our program and our efforts to create an inclusive community of naturalists to be essential to the high levels of satisfaction and an important factor in sustained engagement.

It's also important to address the skeptical views and challenge the more cynical views of certification. First, no reputable naturalist certification program claims to make expert naturalists in a matter of a dozen weeks. The use of the term “master” naturalist is problematic for that and other reasons, which is why it's not used in our program in California. We all agree that expertise is gained over time – often a lifetime – and our program is happy to simply inspire, support or reinforce that pursuit.

Finally, while we live in a time full of scams, cons and frauds, the suggestion that certification is just a way to separate you from your money really reinforces my view of the debilitating nature of cynicism. Most naturalist certification programs are run on a shoestring budget. Statewide program costs are often supported by land-grant universities, nonprofits or state agencies. The registration fees of a typical course are barely enough to cover the costs of the educators who deliver them. State and local programs regularly pursue grants, constantly writing proposals to ensure that cost isn't barrier to participation. Having worked in this field for several decades now, I can safely say that the course instructors are driven not by profits but by their values and deep sense of purpose.

So, when someone asks you about California Naturalists or Climate Stewards, let them know what certification really means. Embrace their interest, address their skepticism, redirect their cynicism and invite them to join our community and transform the way they see their environment and their role in protecting it.

Posted on Friday, June 28, 2024 at 8:08 PM
  • Author: Gregory Ira, UC Environmental Stewards Director

Program Council visits UC ANR sites in Monterey Bay area

UC ANR Program Council visited program sites in the Monterey Bay area.

Every year the UC ANR Program Council visits programs for one of their monthly meetings. In June, they toured several sites in the Monterey Bay area.

Their first stop was UC Santa Cruz, where they met with Katharyne Mitchell, sociology professor, Agricultural Experiment Station faculty member and dean of the Division of Social Sciences. Joji Muramoto, UC Cooperative Extension organic production systems specialist, and three of the five new AES faculty located at UCSC – Matt Sparke, professor of politics; Greg Gilbert, professor of environmental studies; and Michael Loik, professor of environmental studies – described their research. The group walked around the UCSC Farm, learning about its 53-year history advancing small-scale, organic production and hearing from students what the experience has meant to them.

At UCSC, they met AES faculty and toured the Alan Chadwick garden.

Next they headed to Marina to discuss the innovation initiatives at the UCSC Monterey Bay Education, Science and Technology Center (MBEST) and the developing collaboration with UC ANR focused on ag tech research and homebase for the new UC Cooperative Extension specialist position to work on food safety, drones and remote sensing.

They had lunch with staff at the UCCE Monterey County office in Salinas, then local farm advisors gave presentations on their research and extension. Michael Cahn discussed CropManage. Aparna Gazula and Mark Bolda described their work with non-English speaking farmers. Devii Rao talked about cattle grazing as a tool for wildfire prevention.

Their last stop was at the USDA Agricultural Research Service Lab for Crop Improvement and Protection Research in Salinas, where the recently announced UCCE specialist in coastal produce safety systems will be located, growing the cohort of UCCE specialists there.

Posted on Friday, June 28, 2024 at 3:05 PM
  • Author: Katherine Webb-Martinez

Read more

 
E-mail
 
Webmaster Email: lforbes@ucanr.edu