UCD campus restoration
The purpose of this project was to assess how restoration of native grasses into exotic-dominated grasslands alter multiple ecosystem services and soil characteristics. At each site, three locations were sampled within the restored site (at each location, separate samples were taken underneath vs. inbetween bunchgrasses), and 3 samples were taken at an adjacent unrestored site (similar in slope, aspect, soil type, etc. to the restored site)
A number of soil ecosystem services differed in exotic vs. native stands. In addition, soil ecosystem services varied spatially within native stands- often differing directly under the native plants versus in the spaces between the native plants.
Soil surface erosion resistance was higher in exotic than native plots (both directly under bunchgrasses and between them). Soil carbon differed in depth distribution-- in the exotic plots, it had much higher carbon at the 0-15cm soil depth, while C was higher in natives at the 30-60 cm depth. % Soil organic matter (loss on ignition) was greater in exotic plots in the top soil (0-15cm) compared to natives (no differences deeper in the soil). Soil nitrogen did not differ across restored vs. unrestored areas. Soil bulk density and water holding capacity also didn't differ across treatments
3-6 years, depending on site
all sites monitored had substantial native grass cover as a result of restoration activities
% native grass cover
invasive species
repeated exotic plant control after restoration plantings (mowing, burns, herbicide, hand weeding, etc.)
A number of tradeoffs between natives vs. exotics. Natives have higher deep soil carbon (which is likely more stable for storage over the long-term, and can contribute to deep soil water retention), but exotics had far higher surface soil C. Exotics also have higher surface erosion resistance than the native restoration sites
This project researched successful restoration sites, so not applicable