California Ecosystem Management Database
University of California
California Ecosystem Management Database

Database

Restoration Ecology
 

Register Log in

Project Detail View

UCD campus restoration
Yes
The purpose of this project was to assess how restoration of native grasses into exotic-dominated grasslands alter multiple ecosystem services and soil characteristics. At each site, three locations were sampled within the restored site (at each location, separate samples were taken underneath vs. inbetween bunchgrasses), and 3 samples were taken at an adjacent unrestored site (similar in slope, aspect, soil type, etc. to the restored site)

Project Results

A number of soil ecosystem services differed in exotic vs. native stands. In addition, soil ecosystem services varied spatially within native stands- often differing directly under the native plants versus in the spaces between the native plants.
Soil surface erosion resistance was higher in exotic than native plots (both directly under bunchgrasses and between them). Soil carbon differed in depth distribution-- in the exotic plots, it had much higher carbon at the 0-15cm soil depth, while C was higher in natives at the 30-60 cm depth. % Soil organic matter (loss on ignition) was greater in exotic plots in the top soil (0-15cm) compared to natives (no differences deeper in the soil). Soil nitrogen did not differ across restored vs. unrestored areas. Soil bulk density and water holding capacity also didn't differ across treatments
3-6 years, depending on site
all sites monitored had substantial native grass cover as a result of restoration activities
% native grass cover
invasive species
repeated exotic plant control after restoration plantings (mowing, burns, herbicide, hand weeding, etc.)
A number of tradeoffs between natives vs. exotics. Natives have higher deep soil carbon (which is likely more stable for storage over the long-term, and can contribute to deep soil water retention), but exotics had far higher surface soil C. Exotics also have higher surface erosion resistance than the native restoration sites
This project researched successful restoration sites, so not applicable

 
20 sites found
Name Floristic Province Ecosystem type Size Topography
1 native - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 2.0000 ac flat
1 exotic - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 2.0000 ac flat
2 native - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 0.5000 ac flat
2 exotic - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 0.5000 ac flat
3 native - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 7.0000 ac flat
3 exotic - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 7.0000 ac flat
4 native - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 10.0000 ac flat
4 exotic - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 10.0000 ac flat
5 native - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 3.0000 ac levee slope
5 exotic - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 3.0000 ac levee slope
6 native - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 9.0000 ac 15 degree slope
6 exotic - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 9.0000 ac 15 degree slope
7 native - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 7.0000 ac flat
7 exotic - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 7.0000 ac flat
8 native - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 20.0000 ac flat
8 exotic - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 20.0000 ac flat
9 native - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 12.0000 ac flat
9 exotic - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 12.0000 ac flat
10 native - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 2.5000 ac flat
10 exotic - name Sacramento Valley Grassland 2.5000 ac flat

1 contact found
Name Project Role Title Email Phone
Valerie Eviner Data owner Associate Professor veviner@ucdavis.edu 530-752-8538

 

Monitoring

To describe overall monitoring scheme, use text boxes below (e.g. how many subplots were sampled, how they were selected, etc.). To describe individual measures (e.g. plant composition)- use the Add Monitoring Measurements button below.
 

Type Protocol Timing Units Action
Other soil cores taken in increments (0-15, 15-30, 30-60 and 60-90 cm depths). Soils dried, then ground and run for %C, converted to kg Carbon/m2 with bulk density measures, and by using the (proportion of native cover x soil C under natives)+(proportion of area between native grasses x C in those interspaces). For the exotic controls, results are from a sample of 3 bulked soil cores randomly sampled across the site Winter/ spring

Other soil cores taken in increments (0-15, 15-30, 30-60 and 60-90 cm depths). Soils dried, then ground and run for %N, converted to kg Nitrogen/m2 with bulk density measures, and by using the (proportion of native cover x soil N under natives)+(proportion of area between native grasses x N in those interspaces). For the exotic controls, results are from a sample of 3 bulked soil cores randomly sampled across the site Winter/ spring

Quantitative measure soil cores taken in increments (0-15, 15-30, 30-60 and 60-90 cm depths). Soils were placed in buchner funnels, saturated with water, and covered with plastic wrap for 24 hours (allowing for soil to drain, but no evaporation from the soil. Soils were then weighed, dried and weighed again, to assess the moisture held by the soil. This measure was done at each depth. Depth recorded here is 0-15 cm winter/spring

Quantitative estimates of population size soil cores taken in increments (0-15, 15-30, 30-60 and 60-90 cm depths). Soils were placed in buchner funnels, saturated with water, and covered with plastic wrap for 24 hours (allowing for soil to drain, but no evaporation from the soil. Soils were then weighed, dried and weighed again, to assess the moisture held by the soil. This measure was done at each depth. Depth recorded here is 15-30 cm Winter/ spring

You must choose a site before you can update the management practices.

Select the Spreadsheet Export that you would like and click the "Export Data" button.

You must choose a site before you can add a goal.

Questions? Email: veviner@ucdavis.edu

 

Webmaster Email: sbedberg@ucanr.edu